CPU/Mobo AMD reveals details on Bulldozer and Bobcat CPUs

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dark Star

Innovator
amdz.png
The Hot Chips conference has been running over the past few days in California and AMD has taken the opportunity to release some more details on its upcoming CPUs. The highly-anticipated ‘Bobcat' and ‘Bulldozer' architectures are set to launch over the next year or so and according to the manufacturer will make quite a splash when they arrive.

sub1w.jpg
Bobcat is the notebook and ultrathin CPU that will be released as a part of the Ontario APU towards the start of next year. The focus for AMD is to achieve performance at around 90 per cent of today's mainstream mobile CPUs while dropping the power-draw to an absolute minimum. According to the company's plans, this will mean a core capable of operating at under 1W when idle.

bulldozerthreads.jpg


Source : AMD Discloses Bobcat & Bulldozer Architectures at Hot Chips 2010 - AnandTech :: Your Source for Hardware Analysis and News
HEXUS.net - News :: AMD reveals more details on Bulldozer and Bobcat CPUs : Page - 1/1

To spice things up, First Fusion reveal to public is in September AMD to show Fusion APU in September - Graphics - Fudzilla
 
Because of this design change, Bulldozer processors will come in totally new packages that are not backwards compatible with older AMD sockets such as AM3 or AM2(+).

techPowerUp! News :: AMD Details Bulldozer Processor Architecture

AMD also told us that it will introduce a new AM3+ socket for consumer versions of Bulldozer CPUs. AM2 and AM3 processors will work in the AM3+ socket, but Bulldozer chips will not work in non-AM3+ motherboards.

AMD Unveils Bulldozer and Bobcat Core Designs - Bulldozer - CPUs, Boards & Components by ExtremeTech

To Fanboys stop using the word future-proof :lol:
 
SidhuScorpion said:
phrase 'future proof' is indeed misleading. but having some sort of compatibility maintained is always good for those on strict budget and have to buy due to failure of older parts.

it so seems that motherboards fail more often as compared to the cpus.. which increases the chance of having to replace the board more that the cpu. Good that newer boards will be able to handle older chips. At present the case is opposite and does not offer any real advantage in practical imo. It is a good move to make it the other way around.

as for it goes about amd fanbois. it is still an advantage as compared to how intel treats the market with no regards to sockets.

at least amd releases same product line for the older sockets for the sake of what consumers on budget want. Intel has a different for budget consumers.. the plans that involve advertisement featuring wallie like figures. :P
 
I'm looking forward to the AMD vs. Intel, SandyBridge vs. Bulldozer fight.... last time Phenom failed and I bought a Q6600... will look to upgrade next year again :)
 
^^ Go through the TR article they have explained beautifully out there:

AMD's Bulldozer architecture revealed - The Tech Report - Page 1

Bulldozer looks better on paper with the first one to support FMA. But Barcelona looked better than Intel competition on paper too, but end result was not so impressive.

Bulldozer's FPU has an advantage in another area, though, as the presence of two 128-bit FMAC units indicates. FMAC is short for "fused multiply-accumulate," an operation that's sometimes known as FMA, for "fused multiply-add," instead. Whatever you call it, a single operation that joins multiplication with addition is new territory for x86 processors, and it has two main benefits.

The first, pretty straightforwardly, is higher performance. The need to multiply two numbers and then add the result turns out to be very common in graphics and media workloads, and fusing them means the processor can achieve twice the throughput for those operations. We've seen multiply-add instructions in GPUs for ages, which is why each ALU in a GPU shader can produce two ops per clock at peak. With dual 128-bit FMACs, Bulldozer's peak FLOPS throughput should be comparable to Sandy Bridge's peak with AVX and 256-bit vectors.

Second, because an FMA operation feeds the result of the multiply directly into the adder without rounding, the mathematical precision of the result is higher. For this reason, the DirectX 11 generation of GPUs adopted FMA as their new standard, as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.