Maybe it's low effort for you, but not for me. I asked my question to other people and thought mixing it with a news would attract the right users.
Yeah, it's really nice based on reviews. amd reached the level of DLSS 3 in one go, which NVIDIA took several years to achieve. I think they’ll make it even better after 1-2 years. anythoughts on NVIDIA's Multi-Frame Generation, if you've personally experienced it?
The absolutely minimum thing one can do when posting any kind of news is to link to a source. You can check some other threads to get an idea. When you say "some reviewers say", at least share those reviews.
www.digitaltrends.com
I wasn't trying to be news media. I was just interested in user experiences and what people personally thought on fsr4 . I've seen all those reviews, but I'd rather hear from actual users than what the media says. and you're right about linking sources, especially if I was sharing news. This is my first post, so I'll definitely pay more attention to that in the future. have a great day !!The absolutely minimum thing one can do when posting any kind of news is to link to a source. You can check some other threads to get an idea. When you say "some reviewers say", at least share those reviews.
The whole discussion on comparison between DLSS 3, DLSS 4, FSR 3.1 and FSR 4 is already covered by Digital Foundry which was also posted on another thread.
FSR4 uses FP8 Wave Matrix Multiply Accumulate which requires much more processing and hence the new hardware for RDNA4. AMD had kept the door open for RDNA3 in the future but the overhead will be a lot.
AMD says that FSR 4 might not be an RDNA 4 exclusive after all
An interview with AMD's Frank Azor reveals the company's plans for FSR 4. It also tells us a bit more about why the GPUs were absent during CES 2025.
