CPU/Mobo AMD's next-gen Bulldozer is a 128-bit crunching monster

Status
Not open for further replies.

iml3g3nd

Explorer
It is never boring in the world of CPUs. Regardless of who's on top, plans for next generations tend to excite everybody in the eco-system… if you deliver, that is. AMD had a lot of tough times of late, and lost a lot of good people due to lack of proper management. In this article, we bring you a look into the architecture that everybody in the industry has been impatiently waiting for. But this time, AMD cannot afford to fail.

The Ex-Alpha engineering teams lead by Dirk Meyer that created K7 and K8 architecture messed everything up with Barcelona/Agena and the infamous TLB-bug [Translation-Lookaside Buffer]. Shanghai/Deneb cleaned a lot of things up and AMD is back being competitive again, but Intel is pushing hard: Intel is operating in tick-tock architectural mode, and so far - AMD isn't able to answer back. K10 and K10.5 were nothing else but improvements over the K8 architecture. Last time we saw a completely new architecture from AMD, the stock market thought that an online dog-food shop was worth half a billion US$, mainstream media was touting that the world is going to end with that horrible Y2K bug... Yes, quite a long time ago. But before we dig into Bulldozer's architecture, let's set the record clear, with a simple architectural comparison between AMD and Intel.

AMD's next-gen Bulldozer is a 128-bit crunching monster - Bright Side Of News*
 
Dark Star said:
So it means AMD goona have rights for two platform .. x86/64 and x128 :D

Way to go :)

its nt exactly 128-bit cpu :)
its APU ...cpu+gpu

128bit cpu alone will be useless :)
 
It isn't a new architecture as best as I can tell - they just seem to be implementing the XMM registers and associated instructions better. But that won't make a difference to most scenarios.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.