Battlefield 3 Fragger Rev 1.0

Status
Not open for further replies.
new pics added guys. give your comments :)

UPDATE: A few of the benchmarks using the fragger rev 1.0

1) Crysis 2 DX-11, 1920x1080, 4xAA+Edge AA, All Ultra, Hi-rez Textures - Avg. Fps 78.9 (Times Square Demo), Avg. Fps 59.6 (Central Park Demo) :D

2) 3D Mark 11, Extreme Preset - 3408, Performance preset - 10200 :D

3) Crysis Warhead DX-10, 1920x1080, 4xAA, All Enthusiast - Avg. Fps 77.4 (Ambush Level)

4) Metro 2033 DX-11, Very High, 0xAA, 16xAF, Advanced DOF - Avg. Fps 57.8 (Front-line Demo)

And Finally

5) Battlefield 3 Beta DX-11, All Ultra, 1920x1080, 4xAA - Avg. Fps 61 (Normalized average of both outdoor & indoor sections) :D

So guys what do you think of the performance.

BTW the CPU was OCed to 4.2 ghz & the powercolor card was unlocked to a HD 6970. Powertune was kept at +20%, 11.10 beta 2 drivers were used & both the cards were clocked at 880-Core, 1375-Memory.

--- Updated Post - Automerged ---

^Thanks man :)
 
^thanks man. Its quite similar to my primary rig but as it is only for playing games, I have tried to save a few bucks wherever I could. :D
 
Awesome rig "Without the monitor" and as stormblast rightly puts it,. aren't you wasting 6950x2 at 1920x1080?
 
^ not really as crysis 2 at 1080p, all ultra requires 2 GPUs for smooth performance. Also BF3 at ultra settings is a killer if I go by the beta performance. Also DICE have been on record saying that the final game will ship with more effects at ultra setting, so I expect two GPUs will be needed for a smooth gameplay.

--- Updated Post - Automerged ---

comp@ddict said:
I'm willing to bet a 60k rig could also power the game through at 60fps at FHD, but BEASTLY RIG U GOT THERE

lets see but all things point to BF3 being a GPU killer at ultra settings :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.