Benazir Bhutto shot dead !!

Status
Not open for further replies.
AAh damn now we wont be able to see aussies tour of pakistan...damn

Btw really feels sad now reading her family facts...all of them murderer this way or other....really must appreciate she came bak to pak after having gone through so much
 
so sad she is best oxford of year and won soem award
but she lost her life because of
President: Pervez MUSHARRAF
he want you improve his own god country ;)
 
Safin said:
Well i agree. Defense however doesn't imply no damages.
Pakistan cannot harbour any ambitions of taking over India and we cannot harbour the same.
actually we can. :D
 
Funky said:
Well I am confident on out defensive capabilities. As far as our offensive capabilities are considered, I am not sure. The end result will be same but I have 0 confidence in out political leaders to take proactive steps. And we have not tested out offensive capabilities in 35 years.

Believe it or not, our military is well equipped for traditional warfare where air, land and sea domination is vital. Its training program is rated one of the best and vigorous by even US forces. We are training forces of over 14 nations in NDA besides our own. ( not many people are aware of this or even know this.)

What has happened today is bad news for whole region and I wont be surprised if our border deployment is increased over next few weeks. Specially if elections go ahead as planned in Pakistan which honestly I dont see happening now and thats why IMHO this assassination was planned.

I completely agree! Its our politicians who are spineless, and not our defense forces. I've a friend who is in the IMA right now, and from what i've heard, indian forces are one of the best! Its sad that these politicians use them in ways that degrades their standards. I just hope they don't wait for pakistan to make the first move if it comes to a war.
 
pak is going down to the dogs...wont be surprised to see nawaz shariff assassinated soon.
 
^^^though they have not tanked in India but i was hoping for a rise in some of the shares that i have invested after yesterdays good showing but, atleast my shares are going down(luckily just down and not tanked)
 
guru said:
actually we can. :D
actually we cannot :ashamed:
Ground realities are a lot different than what we might want them to be.

checksum said:
I completely agree! Its our politicians who are spineless, and not our defense forces. I've a friend who is in the IMA right now, and from what i've heard, indian forces are one of the best! Its sad that these politicians use them in ways that degrades their standards. I just hope they don't wait for pakistan to make the first move if it comes to a war.
You are right as far as politicians are concerned in being spineless, but i won't buy that in entirety. There are a lot of things one has to look at before taking decisive action. You have to look at foreign relations, trade ties, international response, weigh pros and cons and ofcourse accept that you are not America on a global scale or Israel on a middle east scale.
Btw, you won't think they will say we are anything worse than the best in IMA ;) But then again we are among the best ground troops anyway. Its easy to point fingers at politicians, diplomats or even the top brass of our army. You have to be inside and know facts to appreciate that things aren't so easy and nothing is black and white. We have to make tradeoffs and decide whats best. And given such conditions no decision is right or wrong, one can always claim to have a better decision in retrospect.
 
I would agree with Safin. Possibility is one thing and really going ahead and fighting is different. We are already seeing the consequences of decisions taken by a moron. And at least for next few years no one would support a proactive assault on any country.
 
Safin said:
actually we cannot :ashamed:

Ground realities are a lot different than what we might want them to be.

Actually we already have.:P we've done it 1971. while some us like to romanticize [and even want :-[ mofo traitors] India and Pakistan and two EQUAL states going at it. Truth is India is way stronger Political, Social, Economic and Military Institutions than Pakistan.

The armed conflict on India's western front during the period between 3 December 1971 and 16 December 1971 is called the Indo-Pakistani War by both the Bangladeshi and Indian armies. The war ended in a defeat for the Pakistani military in a fortnight.

It was one of the largest surrenders since World War II.

source: Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
^ Wish we had a leader like the one who took that decision. I dont think there is any one who is as bold as her. But presently the situation is also different.
 
I completely agree with guru. But why are we discussing Indo-Pak war anyway? Right now there is a Pak-Pak war. I think the pro taliban forces are more strong in Pakistan than their pro Democratic counterparts.
 
The thing is we got our hands burned when we tried to forcefully resolve the conflicts in our subcontinent. Assassinations of 2 PMs just made our politicians weary of actually being proactive. They have been weary of taking a firm solid political and military stand since 1991.

We are partially responsible for overall political condition in SE asia. We could effectively force ourself as a authoritative nation who has big influence in SE asia. But honestly our politicians are responsible for current state.

Why did our government did not take tough stand on burma conflict? Or for that matter nepal and Sri Lanka issue? No. And the major reason is that our politicians are weary and they choose defensive option first.

Same goes with Pakistan. We let the whole Kargil issue way too lightly in 1999.

Even now there is a chance to take tougher political, economical and military stand but its highly unlikely we will see any more reaction to current crisis from our government. And its never their problem. Like it or not, if there is problem in Pakistan, we have a problem.
 
Al-Qaeda did it
Code:
Islamabad, December 28: An al-Qaeda leader based in Afghanistan has claimed responsibility for the assassination of former Pakistan Premier Benazir Bhutto, whom he described as "the most precious American asset." 
"We terminated the most precious American asset which vowed to defeat (the) 'mujahadeen'," al-Qaeda Commander and spokesman Mustafa Abu Al-Yazid told the Italian news agency Adnkronos International (AKI) in a phone call from an unknown location. 

Al-Yazid was described by AKI as the "main al-Qaeda commander in Afghanistan". It reported that the decision to kill Bhutto was made by al-Qaeda No. two, Ayman al-Zawahiri in October. 

The report said death squads were allegedly constituted for the mission and one cell comprising a "Punjabi volunteer" of the Lashkar-i-Jhangvi killed Bhutto. 

Bhutto died after being shot by a suicide attacker, who later blew himself up near her armoured vehicles just after she had addressed an election rally at Rawalpindi near here. The blast killed nearly 30 people. 

During her campaign to drum up support for her Pakistan People's Party, Bhutto had repeatedly attacked elements who were fomenting extremism and militancy in northwestern region of the country and vowed to crack down on militant groups. 

Bhutto, who returned to Pakistan from exile two months ago, had earlier survived a suicide attack on her homecoming procession in Karachi on October 18 that killed 140 people and injured hundreds more. 
Baitullah Mehsud, a militant leader who was recently made head of Tekrik Taliban-e-Pakistan - a coalition of Pakistani Taliban groups, had reportedly issued threats that he would send suicide bombers to target Bhutto.

We terminated Benazir Bhutto, claims al-Qaeda
 
Funky said:
Why did our government did not take tough stand on burma conflict? Or for that matter nepal and Sri Lanka issue? .

The reason is oil for burma.

If you mess with sri lanka, the tamils get angry and they will remove their support from the goverment.

No idea abt nepal,

Thats the real reason y we dont forcefully resolve the conflicts in our subcontinent.
 
The most important and worst stuff to happen will be assassination of mushy right now...also of nawaz...but its still unlike as he is more of a puppet...
 
Hacker said:
The reason is oil for burma.

If you mess with sri lanka, the tamils get angry and they will remove their support from the goverment.

No idea abt nepal,

Thats the real reason y we dont forcefully resolve the conflicts in our subcontinent.

Thats exactly what I am telling.
Terrorist is terrorist. Be it Hindu Tamil or extremist muslim. It should not matter. They assassinated our PM, and we did nothing, absolutely nothing. And its bigger threat to south india itself. Specially some big cities are easy and soft targets for LTTE.
Sure tamils in sri lanka suffered after independence due to sinhali govt taking stand of giving benifitial treatment to their majority people as they were supposably ill treated during occupation, but terrorism should not be tolerated. Specially when they dared to assassinate Rajiv Gandhi.

As far as burma is concerned, our govt didnt even lodge official protest with their govt recently which was a shocker.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.