But it works sooo well on his X300 ... :Sgoldenfrag said:The 9000 Series is now outdated, well so is the x*** Series but heck .
Its not gonna run smoothly on the 9000, whatever you do.
Ive seen COD2 choke on a 9600Pro even.
goldenfrag said:The 9000 Series is now outdated, well so is the x*** Series but heck .
Its not gonna run smoothly on the 9000, whatever you do.
Ive seen COD2 choke on a 9600Pro even.
love to contradict u goldy... but the x*** series is dead? I have an X800XT that would jack the socks of your current card...goldenfrag said:The 9000 Series is now outdated, well so is the x*** Series but heck .
Its not gonna run smoothly on the 9000, whatever you do.
Ive seen COD2 choke on a 9600Pro even.
I was replying to Techhead ..goldenfrag said:UT2004 has much lower req. than COD2.
You can play COD1 on it at 640*480 all low, quite comfortably.
I hope :S.
COD2 gives me only 30 - 80 FPS @ 1280*1024 . X800XL .
Mine's 350MHZ too ..hunt3r said:That 9000 IGP is just two pipelines and the graphics clock is most prob just around 250-300 Mhz. Its just a DX8 part. And ur graphics memory is shared with the main memory. Moreover ur P4 is much less powerful than his Pentium M. His X300 is a separate gfx card( DX9 ) with four pipelines most prob at 350 Mhz or so, plus it has its own dedicated VRAM. Thats why the game runs much better on his notebook.
Edit : and yes u could be running different settings too.