ab1 said:the conroe once released will destroy AMD.the article is total bullshit.if u checked the recent reveiws on websites,the intel core duo once overclocked a little beats even the FX 60. also the shift to AM2 gives only a 2 to 4% increase.IF the reveiws on conroe were bullshit i doubt the any of the top sites in the world would have put them up
Anish said:WTF are you talking about mate ?
Your saying 1 HDD systems are 25% slower than 2 HDD systems, eh..
Got any benchmarks to prove it ?
Funky said:thats what marketing is all about.
Intel even claimed P4 to be a bomb when it was released, even press was giving it soo much hype in 2001. And it was beaten by last generation Athlon when it was released in many cases.
We will see real picture soon. We have no working AM2 platform results as such. And dont forget AMD can play its price card once again. They made X2 expensive when they had performance advantage. The market strategy, pricing and retail product will decide who is the winner. We dont even know what speed AMD will end up introducing AM2 at. If they think they cant match the new processor clock by clock they can simply increase clock speeds. Just wait and watch. AM2 release is very near anyway.
Until recently, AMD has only had a single plant producing 90nm processors on 200mm wafers, meaning that every dual core CPU they produce made a serious dent in the number of total CPUs they can produce. Even though AMD's new Fab 36 just started shipping revenue generating product, dual core chips will continue to come out of Fab 30 for the time being. Intel, by comparison, has a total of five 300mm fabs currently in production that crank out both 90nm and 65nm CPUs. Being able to produce chips on 300mm wafers itself means that you can make more chips at a time, but also having many more fabs helps as well. Intel estimates that its five 300mm fabs can produce as many chips as approximately eight of its older 200mm fabs. What this all boils down to is that pricing its entry-level dual core processor in the $200 - $250 range is not too difficult for Intel
Aditya said:Im sure they can even afford to sell the chips at $50 and make a profit :|.
Aditya said:Ok, do you guys know, it costs about 12$ for Intel to manufacture even the Highest end Dual Core 65nm Chip. Takes AMD about 20$ to Manufacture the X2's (90nm).
Im sure they can even afford to sell the chips at $50 and make a profit :|.