EA Sports Cricket 2005 Review *TE Exclusive*
Thanks to ImageShack for Free Image Hosting
Introduction:
This is my second game review after the FIFA 2004 review I did a year or two ago. I know its a long gap but I don't always have the opportunity to obtain the latest games. This time though, I was lucky to get my hands on the latest EA offering, Cricket 2005. However, the icing on the cake is that my ageing MX440 graphics card is still young enough to play the game without any problems. Let's go straight into the review then but first a bit of introduction for those who are not followers of EA or cricket games in general.
Cricket as a sport doesn't enjoy the popularity of other big sports like football or rugby. Moreover, the demand for cricket in countries like US or Canada is next to nil. As a result, the game developers don't always feel like investing their money and resources for small markets like UK, Australia or India. While saying this, I'd like to thank EA Sports and Codemasters (the makers of Brian Lara Cricket series) for having identified the needs of cricket gamers and accordingly giving their best to please them. With every offering, both are improving but the stage of perfection is still far away. Cricket 2005 happens to be EA Sports desperate attempt at capturing the market share from Brian Lara International Cricket 2005 (published by Codemasters). EA policy, till now, was to come out with annual sequels to the most popular games like FIFA, NBA etc. and a sequel every two years for comparatively less popular games such as Cricket. After Cricket 2002 and Cricket 2004, EA was to come up with a game titled Cricket 2006 but now it seems that the re-incarnation of BLC series forced EA to rename its Cricket 2006 game as Cricket 2005. The result, as expected, a half baked product and far from complete.
Graphics:
When I started the game for the first time, it felt much like re-modeled Cricket 2004 barring a few changes here and there. The noticeable among those are a completely new player models. This is due to the utilization of technology from other EA blockbuster sports games such as FIFA, NBA & Rugby but it seems they have used the older technology because players in FIFA 2005 look ten times better than this. Infact, the cricket players now look more like body builders straight out of the gym and into the cricket ground. Maybe they've just put in the rugby player models without much modification. As a whole, this one is a welcome change from the lifeless models of Cricket 2004. EA have tried hard to re-create the player faces to match their real life counterparts and to some extent they've succeeded in doing so for most of the players (mostly Australian and English players). Sadly, the Indian players missed out as there is no similarity between real players and models. Sachin Tendulkar with a moustache looks like Md. Azharuddin (as mentioned by someone in our forums). The height and body mass of all players look the same. So, Cricket 2005 in this respect has a lot of scope for improvement.

Thanks to ImageShack for Free Image Hosting
Introduction:
This is my second game review after the FIFA 2004 review I did a year or two ago. I know its a long gap but I don't always have the opportunity to obtain the latest games. This time though, I was lucky to get my hands on the latest EA offering, Cricket 2005. However, the icing on the cake is that my ageing MX440 graphics card is still young enough to play the game without any problems. Let's go straight into the review then but first a bit of introduction for those who are not followers of EA or cricket games in general.
Cricket as a sport doesn't enjoy the popularity of other big sports like football or rugby. Moreover, the demand for cricket in countries like US or Canada is next to nil. As a result, the game developers don't always feel like investing their money and resources for small markets like UK, Australia or India. While saying this, I'd like to thank EA Sports and Codemasters (the makers of Brian Lara Cricket series) for having identified the needs of cricket gamers and accordingly giving their best to please them. With every offering, both are improving but the stage of perfection is still far away. Cricket 2005 happens to be EA Sports desperate attempt at capturing the market share from Brian Lara International Cricket 2005 (published by Codemasters). EA policy, till now, was to come out with annual sequels to the most popular games like FIFA, NBA etc. and a sequel every two years for comparatively less popular games such as Cricket. After Cricket 2002 and Cricket 2004, EA was to come up with a game titled Cricket 2006 but now it seems that the re-incarnation of BLC series forced EA to rename its Cricket 2006 game as Cricket 2005. The result, as expected, a half baked product and far from complete.
Graphics:
When I started the game for the first time, it felt much like re-modeled Cricket 2004 barring a few changes here and there. The noticeable among those are a completely new player models. This is due to the utilization of technology from other EA blockbuster sports games such as FIFA, NBA & Rugby but it seems they have used the older technology because players in FIFA 2005 look ten times better than this. Infact, the cricket players now look more like body builders straight out of the gym and into the cricket ground. Maybe they've just put in the rugby player models without much modification. As a whole, this one is a welcome change from the lifeless models of Cricket 2004. EA have tried hard to re-create the player faces to match their real life counterparts and to some extent they've succeeded in doing so for most of the players (mostly Australian and English players). Sadly, the Indian players missed out as there is no similarity between real players and models. Sachin Tendulkar with a moustache looks like Md. Azharuddin (as mentioned by someone in our forums). The height and body mass of all players look the same. So, Cricket 2005 in this respect has a lot of scope for improvement.