Crysis 2 - Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
rite said:
You got the calculation wrong.

It is 41 or so FPS in 16x10 advanced.

At 16x10 gamer it will be 60+.

At 19x10 gamer it will be around 50 or so. but 50+.

And there isn't too much difference btw a GTS 250 and a 5770, at most 15-20%.

And depending on which level etc he is, there can be some performance difference.

So he might be right if he says that he is playing at 19x10 Gamer (which is the lowest available in the beta) on a GTS 250 with FPS hovering around 50-60 FPS for most of th time, if not around 60 where there is anyway a cap.

Also, please note that 60+ is still 60 so that lowers your actual average. If you remove the cap, the avg FPS goes up. So the results in that benchmark will probably increase by 2-5 FPS to get a really accurate benchmark.

I am not saying that he is lieing or he isnt lieing. But it is perhaps possible (will need to be actually tested to confirm tho) to run Crysis 2 at 19x10 lowest/Gamer settings with really good around 60 FPS performance especially if you have a Core i5/i7 with 3+GB RAM with you!
Click to expand...

Geforce GTS 450 Vs HD 5750 Vs GTS 250 Benchmarks Test

Now rest others should tell.
 
Now this is what I call LOL

I am talking of Crysis 2 Gamer settings. Not Crysis Warhead.

And just btw, for Crysis 2, Gamer is the lowest settings. While for Crysis Warhead, Gamer is equivalent to High.
 
rite said:
And there isn't too much difference btw a GTS 250 and a 5770, at most 15-20%.

And just btw, for Crysis 2, Gamer is the lowest settings. While for Crysis Warhead, Gamer is equivalent to High.
Click to expand...

was an answer for that.
 
No, it doesn't. You don't understand.

5750 and 250 are comparable in that link.

And a 5750 is like 15-20% faster at most, at most, that is. And I said that the difference btw a 250 and 5770 is at at most 15-20%. So it is bang on!
 
rite said:
No, it doesn't. You don't understand.

5750 and 250 are comparable in that link.

And a 5750 is like 15-20% faster at most, at most, that is. And I said that the difference btw a 250 and 5770 is at at most 15-20%. So it is bang on!
Click to expand...
hope someone explains to you better.

*sigh! sign out*
 
I suggest you guys stop this non-sense. Estimating FPS in terms of a leaked BETA is equivalent to shit.

And gpu performance is not estimated with a single game. Its the over all score that matters.
 
jojothedragon said:
I suggest you guys stop this non-sense. Estimating FPS in terms of a leaked BETA is equivalent to shit.
And gpu performance is not estimated with a single game. Its the over all score that matters.
Click to expand...
Yep agreed.The first statement is absolutely correct.And secondly i dont understand what this guy is saying.

Therefore you are requested to stop this nonsense argument.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom