Laptops Dell Inspiron Mini 9 @ $349

Yamaraj said:
Many, or should I say 'most', don't actually need a quad-core, or even, a dual-core setup for their daily needs - which scarcely falls beyond a few hours of net browsing, using email, instant messaging, word processor and spreadsheet programs and listening to music. And when portability is taken into account with these basic needs, a usual 14" or 15" laptop is too bulky a convenience to be carrying around all day. Most of the UMPCs in past have either been too pricey, or too focused on one segment of customers or two to be taken seriously for mass marketing.

Products like Eee PC and Aspire One, however, have changed it forever. Now you can have almost all the benefits of a conventional laptop crammed inside a tiny netbook that's not heavy on your pocket at all. Not everyone buys a laptop for playing Crysis or heavy multimedia work. That, in fact, defies the very purpose of portable computing - being hard on battery life. Netbooks offer you the best of both worlds, thus catering to the mobile computer market almost perfectly.

I don't see how a 9" Eee PC or Aspire One with BT, WLAN, Windows XP, dolby sound, SSD/HDD or both options and 5-7 hrs of battery life for ~20k don't fulfill the need for a "full-fledged" laptop any worse than a ~1.20k laptop with more or less the same features and a much worse battery life.

Exactly :D

Its basically for people who want a nice little notebook which can be easily carried around whole day long and is good enough for normal net browsing etc :)

As for the Via Nano, there are as of Yet NO Netbooks based on the design :P

What they have given is tests etc by Via itself ( i think :ashamed:)

Also, the Nano will consume a lot more power than the Atom as well, so battery life will probably take a hit.

The Atom Chipset (Pauloso or something) will really bring down power requirements once it comes out and hopefully battery life improves a lot :D
 
techie_007 said:
Exactly :D

Its basically for people who want a nice little notebook which can be easily carried around whole day long and is good enough for normal net browsing etc :)

As for the Via Nano, there are as of Yet NO Netbooks based on the design :P

What they have given is tests etc by Via itself ( i think :ashamed:)

Also, the Nano will consume a lot more power than the Atom as well, so battery life will probably take a hit.

The Atom Chipset (Pauloso or something) will really bring down power requirements once it comes out and hopefully battery life improves a lot :D

@techie...I didn't get you...The tests were done by via?:huh:

Also when nano was compared its idle power consumption was lower than atom&under load it was up by few watts...Even though it runs at 1.8ghz&having 800mhz fsb...

Nicely put up by yamaraj about netbooks...:hap2:
 
sri_k said:
@techie...I didn't get you...The tests were done by via?:huh:

Also when nano was compared its idle power consumption was lower than atom&under load it was up by few watts...Even though it runs at 1.8ghz&having 800mhz fsb...

Nicely put up by yamaraj about netbooks...:hap2:

I meant that quite a lot of the quotes/benchmarks etc (including 1 infamous one showing Via Vs Atom playing 1080P) were initially released by Via. The 1080p one was subsequently debunked at a lot of places.

nz, heres a roundup:

http://cloudbookumpc.com/via-nano-vs-intel-atom-consolidation-of-reviews

Pros for Nano:

Definitely faster and probably cheaper too. :ohyeah:

Cons for Nano:

No availability in boards/netbooks yet.

TDP of 25W

Pros for Atom:

TDP of ONLY 5W, so suited for even smaller devices.

Newer chipset yet to come which will consume even lesser power.

Brand Intel will sell it like crazy :P, easy availability

Cons:

Lower performance.

The endpoint is that the Nano is supposed to be good from what has been revealed so far, but theres nothin in the market yet. Once it comes then only we can see performance/battery life etc. Same goes for the upcoming Atom Chipset too :)

So lets see how it goes ;)

Me I prefer performance, if Via can offer it, with decent battery life, Via it is :ohyeah:
 
Back
Top