nope. simply don't respond to calls after working hrsIf you carry two, is the second one provided by the company? Carrying two phones seems like a hassle.
2 sim cards in1 phone is enough..If you carry two, is the second one provided by the company? Carrying two phones seems like a hassle.
Yes, also using Samsung Private Folder / Knox based isolation. Phone is mine, 1 sim company's which is open when screen is unlocked, other is personal sim in secure folder together with personal apps requiring more security.2 sim cards in1 phone is enough..
My One private number used only for banking and transactions is always disabled.Yes, also using Samsung Private Folder / Knox based isolation. Phone is mine, 1 sim company's which is open when screen is unlocked, other is personal sim in secure folder together with personal apps requiring more security.
My One private number used only for banking and transactions is always disabled.
Not in my company. They expect me to be available in my phone all the time so I have found it as an excuse to use another number as per my convenience. Also, I use Android + iPhone both for their own use cases. I have an air tag & apple watch that needs iPhone to function well.Isn't this rule enforced by companies rather than you deciding to carry two devices?
Some devices can't be used on company's network, so they provide you with one. Some do it for the sake of consistency and ease of operations. Some companies want to maintain their image so they give you an iPhone. And then there are projects that don't allow any kind of external devices.
I was lucky enough to not have any kind of restrictions. I was required to be available on call during cortical times only.
What's the point of disabling it?
1) you won't get real time SMS notifications if someone is trying to gain access to your account
2) what if your bank is sending you an update... of a planned downtime?
3) there's no extra security if your phone gets stolen along with that disabled SIM
Nope.If you carry two, is the second one provided by the company? Carrying two phones seems like a hassle.
1. This hardly happens, if you know basic dos and donts.1) you won't get real time SMS notifications if someone is trying to gain access to your account
2) what if your bank is sending you an update... of a planned downtime?
3) there's no extra security if your phone gets stolen along with that disabled SIM
Nothing as such, no secrets etc.But what are you trying to achieve by keeping that SIM disabled? Is this some obscure industry secret?
I call it anti-security setup as you wouldn't know if someone took money from your account or you won't get OTP when someone is using your credit card details and you can immediately block your card. I can't think of a single reason where disabling a SIM is helping with security.Nothing as such, no secrets etc.
I am now habitual, to enable SIM every time to make a UPI transaction (or anything else) and disable immediately after done.
When any other person gets access to phone, it takes time for them to understand why the payment with SIM1 is getting declined or no OTP received.
My own small security setup..
Using this setup since a decade now.I call it anti-security setup as you wouldn't know if someone took money from your account or you won't get OTP when someone is using your credit card details and you can immediately block your card. I can't think of a single reason where disabling a SIM is helping with security.
Something being done for a long time doesn't make it correct. Some people like @chyawanprash were getting confused. But, I can't see any benefit. If someone is already in your phone, they can enable the SIM and see the OTP. If they are not in your phone, they can't see the OTP even if it arrives. Only people it might fool is grandparents/little kids.Using this setup since a decade now.