bioshock test but it alreay impove that gtx verison extra 1fps
but it is hardly u oc higher
but there are many problem at this company product where show fade one
I hang out on forums and I see a lot of fakes and can spot them a mile off. Faked is when people add numbers/buttons/features to old models and then pass them off as new.
There was nothing added to these photos. They were poor quality, with cranked contrast, but there was nothing fake about them. They looked legit and are legit.
Someone took a GTX and removed the "X". Its obvious because they were dumb enough to leave the 768mb of ram.
Look, I honestly don't care. The photos looked faked because they were modified a lot. All I asked for was for some real pictures with other things in the background eg: pictures of the cards on a table / in a computer / in someone's hand. Now we have some so its easy to say they were real now.
But come on, you want to say nothing was faked? Thats just ignorant.
The above is one I just put together, what looks real... Tom's with its blurry text and crystal clear very bright "G92" or the newer Expert one? Funny enough if you overlay them in Photoshop they line up almost perfectly even though the chip themselves is at an angle in Tom's shot...
Also this one
Looks very fake because of the high contrast in the black and white section, there is no extra light that should be shown on the reflective surface of the heatsink.
Notice how dull it appears compared to the white CD sleeve here?
Anyway, enough is enough, there was plenty of reason to doubt the leaks, like I've been saying, take everything you hear with a grain of salt... :tongue:
