Google’s Android One Program Is a Flop, Sales Way Behind Any Expectations

The Knight

Knight is coming
Adept
It looks like Google’s Android One project to tap into the emerging markets where smartphones adoption is still on a low level hasn’t received enough positive feedback to be considered successful.

Despite the search giant’s attempts to gain more market share in the emerging markets, customers and retailers alike don’t seem interested in Google’s Android One products.

India is the first country where Google introduced its Android One pilot project, but results after two months are discouraging. However, the fault may be on Google’s part as the search giant has decided not to sell any Android One phones through physical stores.

Three native handset makers agreed to launch Android One smartphones in India: Karbonn, Micromax and Spice. These Android One smartphones were launched in India back in September, but they were only available through three online retailers: Amazon, Flipkart and Snapdeal.

According to Indian publication The Economic Times, the fact that Google refused to sell any Android One smartphones through other channels than online attracted local brick and mortar retailers’ wrath.

The direct result is the fact that neither of the major physical retailers stocked Android One smartphones and they are less likely to do it now if Google doesn’t change something in its selling policy.

Sangeetha Mobiles MD Subhash Chandra said that “since Android One decided not to sell in physical stores during its launch, we, as part of modern trade, have decided not to stock Android One either.”
The margin offered by Google to retailers for Android One phones is lower than industry's average
Another aspect would be the fact that the margin offered by Google for these Android One smartphones is around 3-4%, which is far lower than the industry average of 9-10%.

Obviously, this would be another reason for the physical retailer not to stock the Android One devices, but that could have been avoided if Google had at least negotiated with any of the major companies like Croma, Future Group, Planet MRetail, Next Retail, BiC, Lot Mobile, Reliance Retail or Sangeetha Mobiles.

Earlier this month, at least two retail chains started to sell Android One handsets, but officials of both The MobileStore and UniverCell doubt that they will add more devices to their portfolios due to low sales.

Last but not least, PlanetM Chief Executive Officer Sanjav Karwa claims that Google should find a way bring the price of Android smartphones even lower. Currently, Android One phones sell in India for prices between Rs 5,900 ($95 / €75) and Rs 6,500 ($105 / €85) outright.

However, Karwa says that for an Android smartphone to sell very well in India, it needs to cost around Rs 2,000 ($30 / €25) or Rs 3,000 ($50 / €40).
 
"However, Karwa says that for an Android smartphone to sell very well in India, it needs to cost around Rs 2,000 " - o_Oo_O!!
 
Bad marketing, 6K phones sell more at physical stores than on line unless people feel they are getting swift at altos price , also people think snapdragon is much superior than mediatech processors
 
Main problem I feel is the choice of the company(Karbonn/Micromax) which were chosen as brand partner to sell these phones. If established brands like LG/Sony/Samsung were tapped, more people may have had considered these phones. Nowadays most people know that buying a Micromax/Karbonn phone is a gamble.
 
Google's marketing sucks. If only they had branded the devices as "Google Android One" instead of having the Spice, Karbonn and Micromax logos on them...

Pity because the devices are actually very good.
 
Yeah actually associating "Google" with phone name would have made a difference. Like today no one says I have a ASUS Nexus 7 2012, they just say google nexus 7, makes a boat load of difference in people's perception.
No idea what google was even thinking going with MMX and Karbonn.
 
Last edited:
No manufacturer would agree for there name to be removed from the name.

Even N5 is LG Nexus 5.

I am not saying you remove the name. But from our perspective, we usually tend to drop the main manufacture name (at least that is what i have seen with nexus 7) when talking about it.
 
Most people refer to N5 and N4 as Nexus 4/5 only. Many people don't even know or have forgotten who manufactured them.
I am not saying you remove the name. But from our perspective, we usually tend to drop the main manufacture name (at least that is what i have seen with nexus 7) when talking about it.
Agree with both of you but manufacturers do this and Google since not being a hardware manufacturer keep themselves away from Name branding.
 
I don't buy the argument that these phones flopped because no B&M stores were selling them. Moto G/E, Xiaomi Mi3/Redmi 1S too are available through online mode only and they sold/are still selling in good numbers.

IMHO, Motorola and Xiaomi killed the project by offering Moto E & RedMi 1s at equivalent/less price. Moto and Xiaomi garnered good brnad recognition after their overwheling success with Moto G & Mi3. So people feel more comfortable while choosing these two brands over Micromax/Spice/Karbon. As @ashrr and @raksrules stated, things might have been different had Google stamped their logo in this phones.
 
No manufacturer would agree for there name to be removed from the name.

Even N5 is LG Nexus 5.

There's a difference between a massive nexus logo + tiny LG logo combo vs medium sized MMX logo + tiny AndroidOne logo. The Nexus brand has named some traction over the years and people know it's from Google. AndroidOne is a new initiative and doesn't have their name anywhere.
 
There is no differentiation within the brands' own plethora of models. Like Samsung, all the 3 - MMX & Co - have so many models that these A1's also seem to be just another model for filling up shelf space.
Sammy has recognized this and they have stated that they are going to prune the number of models. The sooner MMX & Co understand and change the better it would be.
And, BigB Google was supposed to promote the A1, yet to see that...[DOUBLEPOST=1417003128][/DOUBLEPOST]Latest on the A1 from Google:
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com...ush-on-android-one-devices/article6630537.ece
 
Last edited:
Google may suck at many things, but not at marketing. NOT AT ALL.[DOUBLEPOST=1417064702][/DOUBLEPOST]
Micromax/Karbonn are not Indian :|

What? Google has been horrible at marketing Android compared to Apple. Only now have they even begun advertising.

For a lot of people, Android still means Samsung Galaxy.
 
Back
Top