alsiladka said:Uhh.. Which version of OS X you comparing XP with?
Tiger/Leopard.
I havn't used Mac, but i am no fan of XP on the modern hardware. It wasn't developed & optimized with 1GB+ RAM in mind. Its complete stupidity to have a modern dual core + 2GB Ram system and running XP. Waste of resources.
XP SP3 on my C2D, 2GB RAM runs much smoother and much stable than Vista.
The scenario out there today is nowhere like it was more than 6 years back when XP was released. I think Xp was released in 01, thats nearly 8 years from today. The whole system did not utilise as much RAM then as a single browses with multiple tabs does today.
Yeah and in those 8 years MS could only manage to come up with a bloated and crappy version of windows i.e. Vista, which by far is the worst windows release ever, and don't say YOU disagree, it doesn't matter cuz its already out there everywhere.
And so it gave another reason to users to switch to Leopard which in turn resulted in significant increase in number of Mac users worldwide.
The point is, Windows users are left with no option but to stick to XP and till Win7's final build releases with its n iterations, its still tough to say how better it actually is than Vista.
10 chars..