Hackers may catch Indian banks napping

Status
Not open for further replies.

blr_p

Pilgrim
Hackers may catch Indian banks napping | Deccan Herald | 13 July 2011

With the rising incidence of cyber crime, how safe is Internet banking in India? Samir Kelekar finds out

About two months ago, there was a major phishing attack on one of India's largest public sector banks.

I too received a phishing mail even though I didn’t even have an account in that bank then. When I checked with the bank if account holders had lost money, they were not sure.

Users, who enter their credentials in a phishing site and subsequently lose money, do not always admit what they have done. Instead, they blame the bank for losing money.

The increasing incidents of online fraud and hacking have put banks in a difficult position. Phishers are becoming more and more sophisticated and phishing mails have begun to appear in Hindi too, targeting the growing numbers of regional language Internet users. Also, it seems that the law applying to the loss of money in an Internet banking transaction is tilted against the banks.

A well-known legal expert says the liability of cyber crime, in which the customer is not a co-conspirator, is always on the banks. In other words, if a user loses her money, RBI may ask the concerned bank to compensate the user unless it can show that the user herself is involved in a conspiracy to steal the money.

So, even if there is no anti-virus on the user's computer or a key-logger is installed by a malicious hacker on the user's machine, banks would still be held responsible for the loss of money. To avoid these risks, experts say banks should come up with automated methods to ensure that the user's machine is secure before allowing her access to Internet banking.

But not many banks have realised the gravity of the situation and life goes on as usual for them. But surely it won't be long before banks start to realise how vulnerable they are. A chief information security officer (CISO) of a well known bank retorted when confronted with a blatant security hole in the bank's procedure: “Has a fraud happened? If not, why worry?”

This means that he will wake up only when the bank is swindled of significant money, and it may be too late then to plug the hole. The PSU banks usually do not reward performance adequately and hence, you can expect the bank personnel managing security to be not very highly motivated. Further, with their present salary structure, PSU banks fail to attract top security professionals.

Fortunately, in India the major frauds in banks are still not the ones involving hacking. In most circumstances, it is an acquaintance, who defrauds the victim. Recently, in the US, large companies such as Sony and Citibank have been hacked and passwords of millions of users stolen. Why hasn’t such an incident happened in India? My take is that hacker-criminals in India are not sophisticated enough as yet. And international criminals haven’t turned their gaze towards India as yet. But the situation could change anytime.

To be frank, not all security holes of Internet banking can be blamed on the banks. Today's Internet infrastructure is full of holes, and still, banks are moving at high speed introducing newer and newer services, without closing the holes that are found.

To give a few examples, most of the home routers come with default passwords, which few users change. As a result, it is not difficult for a hacker to log into them. Wireless networks using WEP are vulnerable to WEP cracking, and software to do so is freely available on the net. And many of Indian payment gateways have security holes. Banks have to also worry about mobile transactions, which are becoming common.

Vulnerabilities have been found in iphones and other mobiles. Mobiles are increasingly used on wireless hotspots also, and they are particularly vulnerable there. Along with banks, the government also needs to wake up to online security needs.

Recently, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore tied up with a major Chinese company Huawei Technologies, which has funded its center for testing security in telecom systems. It is inconceivable that our government exposes such a critical national security area to a foreign company. The UIDAI, another critical project for national security, is associated with the US companies with dubious credentials.

The government has also failed to act on cyber crime. Until a year ago, Bangalore had not had a single conviction in cyber crime. Having interacted with the cyber crime police, I can vouch for the good job the investigators are doing. However, if the grapevine is to be believed, the reason for the zero rate of conviction seems to be that the powers-that-be have a tough time distinguishing between the IT Act as in the Income Tax Act and the IT Act as in the Information Technology Act.

There are also some bright sides. The two-factor authentication --- requiring a one-time password that is sent on a mobile --- is a much needed improvement that the RBI has mandated for banking transactions. The hacker’s task has got more difficult as he now has to hack the mobile of the victim too along with the desktop computer. However, two-factor authentication is not followed in case of transactions involving share purchase as the time factor is crucial there and one cannot wait for an SMS, which might take minutes or sometimes hours before making the transaction.

What can a lay person do to protect his interest online? While the law favours the user as of now, it is an open question if banks would compensate users in case of a major breach. Thus, it would be surely a good idea for high-value depositors to spread their funds across different banks. ICICI Bank has introduced an insurance policy, which provides a cover of Rs one lakh if money is lost due to fraudulent use of an ATM card. This is a good start.

Secondly, consumer forums should tie up with banks and security companies in educating the users about security of internet banking. After all, however difficult it may look, there is nothing better than taking the bull by the horns.

(Dr Kelekar, a cyber security expert, is managing director of Teknotrends, Bangalore.)
 
Time to pay some money to the lulz folks and ask them to teach a lesson to all the Indian Banks who have the chalta hai attitude.AFAIK the big bank mentioned in the first line was ICICI.

Edit : ICICI bank has a pretty good security feature for doing online transaction which i am happy about .Without debit card you cannot do an online transaction.
 
i have used axis bank and hdfc bank.

one thing i liked about axis is for every transaction like bill pay and all,they send you sms verification code.

which adds another layer of security.

for all online transactions.i prefer to use netsecure virtual cards.
 
pratikb said:
i have used axis bank and hdfc bank.
one thing i liked about axis is for every transaction like bill pay and all,they send you sms verification code.
which adds another layer of security.
for all online transactions.i prefer to use netsecure virtual cards.
+1

AXIS bank has better security.
These virtual cards/ e-wallet is a great initiative :)

HDFC is just asking for some secret question which isn't safe
 
ramanujpatro said:
+1

AXIS bank has better security.

These virtual cards/ e-wallet is a great initiative :)

HDFC is just asking for some secret question which isn't safe
that is in case of netbanking.

the sms verification is now a part of security in all banks.

i think it has to do with rbi's regulations.

rbi also does not allow indian accounts/cc to make gift payments(irreversible) over paypal.
 
DO NOT WRITE YOUR PIN# ON YOUR ATM CARD

Writing on the wall spelt bad news for Dadar bank | HT | July 12, 2011

The police officers investigating the Rs15.20-lakh burglary at the Dadar (West) branch of Union Bank of India on Friday were confounded by a four-digit number scribbled on a wall. But the confusion gave way to shock when they realised that it was the code for the burglar alarm installed outside the bank’s strongroom.

“We were trying to investigate why the alarm did not go off. We found that the alarm had two different modes used for working hours and post-working hours,” said an officer on condition of anonymity.

“During the working hours, the alarm was in kept in day mode wherein only the original key or the master key could be used to open the strongroom. Once the bank was closed, one of the employees would punch in a code that would activate the night mode. In this mode, the alarm would go off even if someone used the original key to enter the strongroom. The idea was that there was no need for anyone to be there after office hours,” the officer explained.

However, the alarm did not go off as the four-digit code used to change the mode was scribbled on the wall right next to the alarm. “The CCTV footage shows that the accused saw the number on the wall and used it to change the alarm mode. He then went to the cashier room, took the key and opened the strongroom door,” the officer said, adding that the code had been written on the wall for the past six months.

S Unawne, senior inspector, Shivaji Park police station, confirmed the news, saying, “We are investigating the case. No arrests have been made in the case so far.”

The police have, however, not been able to identify the accused from the CCTV footage as he was wearing a helmet. The police suspect some insider help in the crime.

Despite several attempts, the Union Bank of India was not available for comment.
 
madnav said:
that is in case of netbanking.

the sms verification is now a part of security in all banks.
i think it has to do with rbi's regulations.
rbi also does not allow indian accounts/cc to make gift payments(irreversible) over paypal.
ya in case of net banking, there is SMS verification for AXIS,SBI and may be other bank as well. This security option is missing in HDFC.
When it comes paying thru debit card the virtual card feature of AXIS is just superb.

These days i avoid making direct payment where they ask for my debit card number and 3- digit CVV.
So, either i prefer net banking or the virtual card/e-wallet.

No the SMS verification is not a part of RBI regulation, coz SBI has the option of not using this feature as well :)
 
ICICI still not have use and throw virtual credit card system. They do have a virtual credit card but it is sort of fixed (number and cvv). But yes we can set the amount for that card which is good.
 
raksrules said:
ICICI still not have use and throw virtual credit card system. They do have a virtual credit card but it is sort of fixed (number and cvv). But yes we can set the amount for that card which is good.
Even that is fine !!
The thing is one should have the discretion to activate/de-activate the virtual card.
This way u can remember the virtual card number and CVV and can activate it when in need :)
 
SBI too sends sms verification code. Moreover now we cant add a biller/beneficiary on the spot, it verifies with the other bank and only after clearance it adds it in our list as trusted.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.