Brave iirc plans to integrate ad blocking extensions in the browser itself, thus eliminating the need for an extension at all, not sure how much progress they have made towards that but if it works fine, then Brave is a viable alternative, but me personally I would prefer the extension itself, faster updates and focused development towards one thing
Hypocrisy of Firefox [Mozilla Corporation]
- Thread starter Ramadhir Singh
- Start date
Google has been investing in Firefox since long time.. Without google they wont have survived so far.
Time for other companies to demand back for there investments.
Time for other companies to demand back for there investments.
Brave has since its inception indulged in various suspect practices. Their adblocker is meant to block ads that they don't receive payment for and to bypass ads that are paid for by the companies. It is effectively a blackmail strategy. At any point, it is better to use the community based options with common interests than use a company provided solution meant to earn them money at your expense.
I suppose you haven't seen all the things Brave has been doing and they are one of the most shady companies.back in days when i used ungoogled chrome in w7, use to face similar. i had to go in registry and delete few things and/or create new profile.
see this this is helpful for you - https://www.addictivetips.com/windows-tips/fix-chrome-not-working-windows-10/ (this is the nearest im able to find online)
not sold man, shared with partners.
if meta/facebook co-authoring something you can guess
this trick as as old as magician taking out rabbit from their hat.
recently pulled out when rebranding facebook to meta, google to alphabets. while is nothing wrong or unethical but they must not claim otherwise. they are not EFF.
Chrome also says they respect your privacy and data - https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/14225066?hl=en
Almost all browser does some or other thing for revenue sources, but they dont misguide as much as ff does.
example Brave it was supported bu google&fb in pre-seed, and they are backed by few of the questionable company, and integrated crypto , etc but still they are better protecting user prvacy and not making a backdoor for advertisers and labeling it something else.
All need money, i absolutely get it. Even proton is starting its crypto wallet and what not.
But if chota fanta directs a bulldozer towards our house claiming to build us a home, everyone knows what is the expected result.
if chromium on windows, then Egde makes the most sense.
The CEO had even stated that their idea is to compete with Google and Meta for ads which includes showing ads that they receive payment for and block ones from Google and Meta. Mozilla is only now taking this approach of serving ads but again have done so publicly unlike these companies.
Last edited:
yes i know, but that's the lesser evil in the lot.
disabled their leo, and crypto. I dont use their shield, rather ads is taken care by ubo, noscript, etc.
all are same, more or less.
That's why i used safari and edge as my primary in respective OS.
for random things i use brave with SOCKS5 rotating proxy, good luck extracting any private information.
image form here - The illusion of choice , nice discussion in that thread.
Last edited:
burntwingzZz
Level H
thats why great open source orgs cant survive on its own
Mr.J
Level H
Linux? KDE? Fedora?
Firefox is a unique case because Google has abused its position as dominant search engine to advertise Chrome, they sometimes break some functionality of their services on Firefox (Youtube videos getting stuck or not loading for eg), either intentionally or by using some non-standard functionality that is only available in Chrome.
alap4m
Level D
Is it just me or is the setting unchecked by default?
I haven't changed any settings, and this was unchecked. I read about this setting from this thread.
As for privacy, it is increasingly becoming a myth or a mirage.
Just accept the truth, and DO NOT share anything incriminating or identifiable online.
The irony is that 90% of the market is cornered by Google and Microsoft, based on users who don't care or understand anything about privacy or data collection.
The remaining 10% of the user base cries wolf over every change made by companies like Mozilla that are trying to survive by monetizing what they can. Even so, they do It publicly and you still have the option to disable all data sharing related settings.
The alternatives like Brave (shady tactics and CEO), Opera (Chinese owned), Arc (severe security breach) are just worse.
The remaining 10% of the user base cries wolf over every change made by companies like Mozilla that are trying to survive by monetizing what they can. Even so, they do It publicly and you still have the option to disable all data sharing related settings.
The alternatives like Brave (shady tactics and CEO), Opera (Chinese owned), Arc (severe security breach) are just worse.
this is what I don't get, like bro you happily give your data to Apple/Google anytime you use their services without even having a choice and here an org is telling you that they will collect data and here's an option to opt out of it. and then they scream like banshees