Infineon CE-5 vs Samsung UCCC - 18 benchmarks compared !

Status
Not open for further replies.
A

Anish

Forerunner
Great comparison for all those looking to buy 2GB kits.

Have you ever wondered which 2GB kit would perform better in your setup? Or how much difference there is between them? This short write-up is an attempt to give one an idea how Infineon CE-5 based 2GB set stacks up against it counterpart built with Samsung UCCC.

I "locked" my Opteron @ 3200MHz and tested each set of memory (CE-5 and UCCC) at it's max possible frequency that particular divider allows - div183 for UCCC @ 291MHz 7-4-4-3.0-1T and div166 for CE-5 @ 267 5-3-3-3.0-1T.
I put as much effort as I could to run each type of memory "as tight" as I could. I decided to limit my test to CAS3.0 on CE-5 as well as TRCD=4 on UCCC only. Both kits have somewhat above average OC potential.

Tests were run one at a time, screenshots taken, then PC was rebooted and next test was performed.

Setup:
AMD Opteron 146 @3200MHz
DFI LP Ultra-D R.A02, BIOS 11/14 Official
NForce4 drivers 6.70, USB, Network and Audio enabled.
EVGA 7800GTX 256MB KO @ 500+40/1400 (low-power mode disabled thru BIOS-mod)
Forceware 84.21, default driver settings (Quality)
Windows XP SP2 fresh install, not tweaked
2GB Corsair TWINX2048-4400PRO (Infineon CE-5)
2GB G.Skill F1-4000USU2-2GBHZ (Samsung UCCC)

There you are, here are the results - 1st column for CE-5 and 2nd for UCCC...

infineon.gif
samsung.gif


3D Benchmarks

3DMark2001 ------> 35371 ------- 35055

3DMark03 ---------> 19687 ------- 19679

3DMark05 ---------> 9173 --------- 9206

3DMark06 ---------> 4681 --------- 4711

Aquamark3 -------> 105792 ------ 105123

X³: Reunion ------> 77.92 --------- 78.05
Productivity/Pi/Synthetic Benchmarks

PCMark04 --------> 6428 ---------- 6396

PCMark05 --------> 5098 ---------- 5054

SuperPi 32M -----> 22:57 --------- 23:08*

PiFast 10M -------> 37.55 --------- 37.72

WinRAR ----------> 787 ------------ 773

Sandra Band. ---> 7902/7814 --- 8187/8133

Everest Lat. -----> 38.8 ----------- 38.4

SM2.0 L1 Band. -> 36848.43 ---- 36824.17

SM2.0 L2 Band. -> 11678.01 ---- 11609.84

SM2.0 Mem Band. -> 7482.55 -- 7918.02
Game Benchmarks at 1600x1200

DOOM 3 ----------> 107.0 --------- 106.8

FarCry ------------> 134.47 ------- 133.10

F.E.A.R -----------> 66 ------------- 65

Quake 4 ----------> 112.3 -------- 112.5
Game Benchmarks at 1024x768 - comming soon! :D
I just thought this could be of use for some. I'm gonna leave conclusions to you guys...
Questions, comments or requests welcomed
Click to expand...

Original Post
 
Well the results are so close that its within the margin of error so we must look at the price and there UCCC wins by a big margin.
 
^^ Psst..

Everyone knows what TCCD is capable of doing but it aint available anymore nor is it available in 1GB modules..
 
So its all upon the Cash you have to spend :ohyeah:

Plus Trancend with samsung UCCC is easily available here.

Nice :ohyeah:
 
goldenfrag said:
So its all upon the Cash you have to spend :ohyeah:

Plus Trancend with samsung UCCC is easily available here.

Nice :ohyeah:
Click to expand...

its not, and neither is 5 BD, i searched for it everywhere today here in hyd, not available anywhere :(

all Trancend 1 gig had Hynix D43 chips....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom