Party Monger
Innovator
That's a very reductionist approach. Every manufacturer has parts that range the whole spectrum from good to bad quality. There are various configurations that range from cheap to costly. There are standards of quality checks which is why a lot of Xiaomi devices are DOA or go dead in 10-20 days. Good parts also have a longer life while may not have any difference in specs or usage.Same company making products.their suppliers are the same.until they (Xiaomi)used IPS displays,supplier was sharp.same as iPhone.processor is Qualcomm used in every top tier manufacturer.iphone uses Samsung nand chips.same used among many of those manufacturers like one plus or Xiaomi.
The processes for the devices in terms of the hardware is literally the same. What differs is overall configuration,choice of exterior materials and the software experience.
iPhone doesn't suffer from fragmentation like the android counterparts hence the softwares for apple devices is better optimised for The specs provided.
I think you cannot understand different companies provide services using a different business model.
Apple wants to believe it should be used by an exclusive few (in terms of India). In the USA ,a truck driver or even a sweeper uses an iPhone. Phones are sold on telecom contracts,so the total ownership cost isn't much different for the end user.
While companies like Xiaomi or one plus want to earn by selling higher volumes and keeping lowest inventory overhang as possible. Apple does this by keeping margins high.
Next time before making an assertion please back it up with something substantial.
Bad shit happens to phones, and no one can deny that apple uses the best possible parts and quality in its phones. Whats sad is that on the occasion that its phone conk off, as is the risk with all electronics, it doesnt back it up with solid service and stand behind its product, and this trend is only in India. Other countries you can just swap the devices without much hassle at the apple stores.