Thanks man....their marketing was getting to me before I reminded myself that the future is all android
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dcac/7dcac283ae5e078e1182a0e66332aebad456125b" alt="Smile :) :)"
. Kidding just a personal pref to stick to android.....
--- Updated Post - Automerged ---
aquaticbullet said:
have a look at lumia 710 also .. i loved the interface .
with initial prices hovering around 18.9k i guess it will suffice but i am sure the prices will come down by jan and it will be bang for buck .
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dcac/7dcac283ae5e078e1182a0e66332aebad456125b" alt="Smile :) :)"
if u are more into customizations u can go for galaxy sl as suggested by others but if u can extend ur budget by 5k then the best fone would be galaxy r. ( it has ample of screen size for ur book reading purposes
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10d90/10d9034f00ff93d62711ca9ed1272c292dc0dd91" alt="Wink ;) ;)"
).
gud luck with ur buy.
Thanks man , Nokia marketing with Lumia was luring me in , before I reminded myself that Andorid is the Future of everything....juts kidding , its just personal preference to stick to android.....
akhurana said:
^^^ it has 4 gb in-built memory but a better processor and screen
Yes , I misread it sumwhere for some other , its 4 gig, which is again quite decent.
lll_aritra_lll said:
Defy has better battery backup than galaxy SL, and its screen size is 0.3 inch smaller, its more pocketable becuase almost the whole area is the screen. it has same 1 GHz processor as galaxy SL, and a good GPU too, and the screen resolution, my personal choice is Defy+
Thats a good point , irrespective of the screen size, the Defy plus or defy have more usable screen size , but smaller footprint since no physical
buttons. which makes it more pocktable.....
YashBhatt said:
First of all,Defy is a great phone when you tend to throw ur phone around the house/places u go....its designed for rough use and thats why has a typical built n design
Being said that,Defy or Defy+ ISN'T "anything Proof" its just resistant to water/dust/fall etc...
But honsetly there is no difference between Defy and Defy+
Its just the processor being 1 Ghz in defy+ and 800Mhz in Defy
Everything else is the same,even the GPU they provide is same....so i don't feel getting a Defy+ would be a great choice
The samsung Galaxy SL is a better option than going for defy
You get a bigger screen,1Ghz proccy,GPU is same as defy
Plus a lot of other features....like video calling as it has a front camera which is not available in defy/defy+
So between Defy and Galaxy SL get the SL
Agreed, defy + reviewers have treated the phone to some extremes , and the phones easily is built to sustain all that, for eg full functionality when submerged under water etc .....not sure even Defy is built to do that ....I think its a great plus to have a phone which you will never worry about water /Stains/ treatment/ fall down etc and in that regard I said that it is 'everything proof' , and I guess that is the real upgrade and processor is actually the same clocked to 1 gig... so thats not making me pull
Again, Im unsure if Defy has all the same toughness of Defy + , if yes, I will any day go for Defy and save 2-2.5 k . Can anyone confirm this?
Battery , galaxy SL has an upperhand atleast on paper.........
lll_aritra_lll said:
not really, defy+ has IP6N certification and 1700 mAH battery, and Bayer module lens but the processor is same as defy (which was underclocked to 800 MHz in Defy) and OMAP 3630 GPU (same as defy). to me Defy+ is not worth an upgrade over Defy and Defy is more VFM.
Some new vocab here for me..... what is IP6N, please care to explain how does it affect me , ditto for bayer module ( Yes I know I cuda googled , but I ask here)
As I Mentioned earlier , for me Defy + over Defy is more because of 'Toughness ' factor than the spec sheet ( although battery is a big welcome).
@All: Any reviews about SE Neo V, hear it fits in the same price bracket......VFM is it?