^ Added a poll. Kindly vote.
Lets put the poll into perspective - This is like deciding whether Paradise Biryani's increased cost makes it worth it not. While personal opinion might differ, it really doesn't matter. Paradise at it's discretion can see whether it wants to decrease it or not.
Also, someone in the thread earlier said, the MQB 10-12 years ago used to be 500. If we use the government figures for inflation, 500rs in 2007 is like ~1.3k today. And given people always complain that mehngai (inflation) has increased more than what government claims it to be, we can probably put this number near 2k? There was no info about fine amount but assuming it was 10 rs, today that is ~22rs and if it was 20rs then today it is ~45rs using government mehngai figures. If we go by popular public opinion of inflation, it will turn out to be even more. So what we are talking about is 1.5k in MQB for a fine of 25-50rs, using government official figures? This assuming bank wants to earn the same profit 10 years ago. I am sure people will be thrilled if their salaries grow just enough to keep with inflation ie if you joined as a fresher at 2.5 lakhs 10 years ago (I did), now you should earn 5.64 lakhs? Does that sound appealing? If not, why do people think banks should do the same?
Secondly, people keep claiming banks are just rolling in money from the money they have deposited in banks. Nothing is stopping them from finding out the truth. Most of the banks are public and their financial results can be pulled in a second. Google "bank name investor relations" and go to annual results, it is always a hefty document talking about everything the bank is doing and will be doing.
Banks have something called net interest margin in these reports which is ~ interest earned per 100 rs.
This figure can be found out from these docs. For SBI, it can be found here and it is not only dismal its going lower each day:
https://www.equitymaster.com/resear...p?symbol=sbi&name=SBI-Detailed-Financial-Data
They make ~2.8 rs per 100rs in interest with them.
Though comparisons are a revealing feature. When compared with the next best public bank ie PNB:
https://www.equitymaster.com/resear...ampaign=rightband&utm_content=compare-company
The NIM is a bit higher but the profits in PNB is negative and even in recent quarters doesn't come close and NPAs are super high. So there is a higher chance of PNB being bailed out using taxpayer money compared to SBI.
So is it that people would rather have everyone's taxes used for bailing out the banks than let it make some profit?
In comparison with the private bank (HDFC):
https://www.equitymaster.com/resear...ampaign=rightband&utm_content=compare-company
As the HDFC CEO said the differential amount they are making per rupee is around 4%, their NPAs are also low. But if you look at profit per employee HDFC makes nearly double than SBI.
The bigger problem is the heftiness of SBI. Why not privatize it and/or cut employees, lets see where does that take people, specially when their taxes are/where used for these banks.