u can say to bring it cozzz u have a Zotac GTX295 .... but i only have a 9600..
my 9600 will began to cry:S :S even for playing a crysis warhead .......
tbh, the main next big thing for me in terms of gaming gfx would be realistic physics for the water and other fluids, which I'm pretty sure even bioshock 2 won't be able to get right.
Not to mention the way they try to move really slowly in visually intensive scenes to give the illusion of smooth framerates.
If you look closely, you can clearly make out that it's really struggling to churn out frames.
more likely for the developers who will license the engine
and saumil is right, the slow motion to mask the crap framerates is quite funny. in fact, the only thing that really impressed me from the ce3 video was the waterfall. i don't think i've ever seen it look so good unmodded for ce2.
more likely for the developers who will license the engine
and saumil is right, the slow motion to mask the crap framerates is quite funny. in fact, the only thing that really impressed me from the ce3 video was the waterfall. i don't think i've ever seen it look so good unmodded for ce2.
Unlikely mate since most devs would probably try to get their hands on the original CE2 and then code/scale accordingly to their games requirement no ? CE3 is probably exactly that, CE2 minus some components. Besides CE2/3 is a failed case as far as licensing is considered.