only unbranded mobiles come with features as u say. v know that nokia is costly and not feature rich , with unbranded u have features and cost effective. now days unbranded do show reliability. so tell me where nokia is ?. sorry divyesh nokia does not impress /satisfy customer as it did earlier. that too it has failed miserably with dual sim models. i have only few options either sam/moto. i invite moto dual sim users to share their experiences. i been through review for nokia dual sim models. but most of the review say the set hangs/reboots. if samsung and unbraded can be successful in dual sim tech why not nokia. samsung and lg have come up with a tech. which uses only one transcever for both sims instead of two. this reduces battery power consumption.(E2152 ,of samsung uses this tech that is why its battery power lasts longer than 2232 dual sim. ,from reviews.)
I am a gadget lover and tech lover but at the same time i will be cautious about cost and durability. i would go for change of gadget/tech only when it is cost effective and durable. as far as touch screen . the technology should get mature,like the touch screen should bear any wear and tear, drops , rough handling. at the same time it should not be a power hungry one with max brightness. i know it takes time lot of research and money.
