Must Read - Mac OS X Flaws : Not User Friendly!

Got introduced to this wonderful article on how Un-User Friendly Max OS X actually is.
Dont jump with your knifes and sword onto me, i am just posting what the actual author has posted.
But go through the entire article. Your time will not be wasted. I was actually thinking of getting a Mac someday and run Windows using Bootcamp. But now, after reading this, i doubt i really want to do that.

Original Source - Mac OS X Flaws.: Mac OS X Is Not User-Friendly!
Things OS X Cannot Do
Right Click to Create Text Files: You have to open TextEdit, create a file, navigate to the right folder, and save as...just to create a stupid file. There is a plugin, but it doesn't work that well. Note: textClipping is NOT a solution. See my comment below. Also see my comment for why you need to create an empty file. I am aware of third-party plugins. They do not completely solve the problem. I will describe that another time.
Set a picture as background: You certainly cannot select a picture in finder to set it as background. No app in OS X lets you do that. You have to use go through a long series of clicks in desktop background settings and manually find your file. The only other way is to open your image file in firefox and set as background. iPhoto can do it, it's very counter-intuitive to use iPhoto to organize non-photos such as wallpapers.
Choose entire folders to be wallpapers: You can add a folder, but SUBFOLDERS ARE NOT INCLUDED. That means you can't manually organize your wallpapesr. Again, iPhoto is useless for anything but photos, so unless all your wallpapers are photos, don't expect iPhoto to be a solution.
Merging folders: (See a comment below for why you need to do this) When you copy a folder, if the new location contains a folder of the same name, there is no way to merge the folders. Instead, Finder overwrites the original folder with the new one. All files in the original folder are lost. The only way to get around this is to use the unix mv -v command....very user unfriendly design.
Some commenters said it's idiotic to have the ability to merge... Well, i hope you don't think people who invented the mv command are idiotic too for including the option.
Basic Things You Need Plugins For (Update: The plugin name in parenthesis):
* Uninstall: Just dragging the application to trash doesn't delete the preference files associated with it. (AppTrap)
* Preventing your computer from going to sleep when you close the lid. If you have external keyboard and mouse hooked up, you can obviously wake the computer back up. But if you're downloading something that cannot be resumed, for example, then you really really don't want the OS to go to sleep when you're switching to a desktop environment. (InsomniaX)
* Resize your window from other than the bottom right corner. (forgot the name of the plugin)
* Open Terminal in any folder from finder, so that the working directory starts in that folder. (forgot the name, but it somehow opens two terminal windows if you don't already have one open)
* There is No Stereo Mix.
(For those of you who don't know, it's for redirecting sound output into sound input, so you can, for example, record the sound output, or have Tunatic identify your music. )
There is a plugin called Soundflower, but it's impossible to both redirect sound and play the it at the same time.
* Cannot turn off mouse acceleration. You need to buy software like USB Overdrive.
Trash is Broken
Cannot selectively delete trash: There is no way to delete one or several items in trash at a time. (useful when you want to double check the items one at a time before you actually delete them). You can only empty all the trash at once.
Cannot restore trash: If you accidentally moved something to trash by accident, there is no option to restore the file to its original location. You have to remember where it was. Why do you even need trash if you can't even restore what you deleted to where it was? If you accidentally deleted a file buried deep in the filesystem, does it make sense to drag it back to....for example...Desktop??
Do not just tell me "why would you ever want it back if you put it in the Trash"...If you don't ever delete a file by mistake, then Trash should be disabled.
Cannot disable trash: Even though trash sucks so much, there is no way to disable
it. There is no way to delete files directly without moving to trash in finder's GUI. The quickest way to quick-delete a file is to use Command-Backspace to delete it and Command-Shift-Backspace to empty Trash (Your application focus has to be the Finder). Two step process...
Finder is Broken
There is no cut: There is no "cut" option like in all other OS. So to move a file you have navigate to the destination in a separate Finder window and drag to it, or drag while navigating in the same Finder window through many folders and hope you don't miss.
Can't calculate total size: When you select some files in a folder and right click -> Get Info to find the total size, Finder displays a box for EACH item with the individual sizes.
That's not what I want. I don't want to manually add up the file sizes.
Update: Cmd-Alt-I. Lets you do that. Hmmmm 3 keystrokes, undocumented, and not an easy way to use mouse to do something this common (or maybe no way at all). On the other hand, I can't see any uses of showing a info box for every file you highlighted. A good list/column view with file details should eliminate this need. Besides, it becomes annoying to close all those info boxes because you can't use Cmd-W on them like on other Finder Windows.

Bad selection of shortcuts: Enter is rename, Command-O is open. Inefficient. The action that you do more requires more keystrokes. What kind of files are renamed more than opened? This is not a "not used to OS X" issue. It's a issue of choosing the key with less keystrokes for the more common action.
Can't do quick keyboard navigation because you can't press enter to go into a subfolder. By this I mean typing the first letter of a folder name, press enter, type the first letter of the subfolder name, enter...etc... You cannot do this in OS X for 2 reasons: 1)Command-O is less convenient to enter because it requires 2 keys 2)After you Command-O, pressing a letter key navigates to a folder of the same LEVEL, not the subfolder. This is true at least in Column View.
More bad selection of shortcuts: Backspace should be move up a level in finder, not back. Moving up a level is used more often. Having to press 2 keys for it (Cmd-Up) is dumb.
Hard to rename files anyway: You cannot rename files in succession. In windows, you would press F2, rename, tab to the next file, rename... etc. In Finder, you have to: enter, name, enter, downarrow, enter, name, enter...etc. That's THREE extra keystrokes for every additional file. (enter, down, enter)
Even harder to mass rename: There is no way select all files, rename them, and have finder append a number after each file like in Vista. Such a simple task shouldn't require automator.
Limited icon size: In icon view, the largest icon size is 128x128 (except in search mode), useless for previewing documents and image files. Yes, there is quicklook, but what if you want to preview multiple files at a time?
Hard to change icon size: It's even harder to change the icon size. You have to go to view options, which requires many clicks or Cmd-J. But the fact that you need to go to a preference dialog to change icon size shows the UI is pretty limited. You need to change preview size depending on the things you're previewing more often than you would want to go in to the view options. (except in search mode, where there is a scroll bar to dynamically change size.).
Bad Spacing: The spaces between icons are too big. If you reduce the spacing (In view options again), the filenames are unnecessarily truncated.
Hard to view metadata: Most views don't show file metadata (size, dimensions, created..etc). Only column view and search mode's icon view have them.
Column view has problems: Let's say you're previewing through a bunch of images in quicklook and deleting the unwanted ones. (so you're pressing down arrow for next file)
When you press cmd-backspace to delete one file, the focus is BACK TO THE PARENT FOLDER. You have to remember and manually navigate to where you left off. If you press the right key (or down key, I forgot), it goes back to the first file in the subfolder.
File transfers don't display transfer rate
Cluttered list view: You can easily clutter up the list view by expanding too many folders. There is no way to automatically collapse all of them. You're stuck with a messed up view. (Update: someone pointed out: Command-A, Left.)
Sorting: Folders are not always at the top when arranging by kind in list view. Need to edit a system file to achieve this. Even if the folders happen to be on top when you sort by kind, you cannot sort by an additional column.
Spotlight sucks
No customization: There are only 3 columns in spotlight search list view. So hard to find information about these files.
No customization: Cannot choose specific extensions or sizes to include/exclude from index. Only a limited preset of types.
Cannot search while indexing: And indexing takes forever.
Bad Calculator Syntax: 2^3 doesn't work. It has to be pow(2,3). I think that's the syntax
for C? Well I shouldn't have to deal with it.
Bad Navigation
No single key delete: It's Cmd-backspace. Delete should be more accessible.
Cannot close property/option dialogs with cmd-w: Inconsistent with other Finder windows.
No consistent shortcut to switch tabs: Firefox, terminal, adium..all have different shortcuts for those. You can probably customize some, but what is the point of having different shortcuts in the first in the first place? They are all TABS. They serve the same purpose. You can remap them, sure, but you have to do that for every non-conforming app. No shortcut for tabs in preference dialogs, either.
Two ways to press a button: Enter = press highlighted/default button. Space = press bordered button. Confusing. Why can't I use arrow keys to move the highlight? Why do you still need the default button highlighted when you knowingly moved away from it? What do you achieve less by simply having ONE highlighted button, and have the highlight movable by arrow key?
Smart folder is not folder like: This means you cannot navigate into it in any application other than Finder, or a Finder based dialog box. Update: Ok. looks like you can. But I remember not being able to do some folder-based things on a smart folder. I'll get back to this later.
Waste of Screen Space
Most applications take up too much vertical resolution: Why can't they have smaller icons? (even after choosing small icons in most apps, they take more space than necessary). Some apps have the rectangular button on the upper right to compact the UI. It doesn't exist for other apps, For example... Safari.
Dock takes up too much space: If it's big, it takes up too much space. If it's small, it's impossible to tell one application from another, especially for minimized windows.
Slow unhide: Since it takes up so much space to be usable, I want to hide it. But the there is a long delay to unhide when you hover your mouse in the right place. Not customizable.
Finder again: List view (and other views) seem take the same space to display less files than other OS. (Windows, KDE Dolphin) There is no way to reduce font size below 8 points, and spacing is too much.
Can't hide menu bar: There is no default way to hide the top menu bar to save space. (yesssssssssss you need to do this for a 1280x800 macbook) (Many apps don't need a menu) You can use presentMyApps. But the keyboard shortcut to launch spotlight no longer works when the menu bar is hidden.
Window Management (see my other post)
No Show Desktop: The way Expose does it leaves parts of the windows on the screen until you undo it. This is not just a personal preference. This means show desktop is designed as a temporary way to access the Desktop. You eventually have to undo it. I think Cmd Opt click on desktop hides all windows, but it doesn't hide Finder.
No option to show windows side by side: You have to manually move and resize the windows, which is hard because you can only resize from the bottom right corner.
Can't open another window for the same app with mouse: You can do cmd-N or cmd-T all you want. But there is no consistent place to open a new window with a MOUSE CLICK.(Clicking on the icon in the dock only selects the app). If your hand doesn't happen to be on the keyboard, shouldn't you be able to one click open a new window?
Expose doesn't include minimized windows: So it's useless for showing ALL open windows. You have to check the minimized ones manually.
Hide and Minimize: So an application can be in 4 states. Closed, Open with windows showing, open with no window showing, and open with some windows minimized. If you forgot about some windows being minimized, you'll probably do cmd-Q on the app to close it.
Separate minimized icons: Logically, windows belonging to an app shouldn't be shown separately from the app's dock icon.
Hard to cycle between windows: Using Expose requires an extra click (and it doesn't show minimized windows) Cmd-Tab switches between applications. Who needs to do that if you application doesn't have a window open? Cmd- ~ is limited to windows of the same application. Witcher is a third-party software that enables per window switching. It's no longer freeware. (And it didn't work that well for me)
The Plus Button: 1) There is no keyboard shortcut for it. 2)Sometimes it's useful, but other times the app can't judge the proper size. It's mostly inconsistent. Firefox just uses it to maximize.
You Need Maximize: Just having the plus button won't do. On a low resolution macbook screen, a "minimal proper size" is almost the full screen anyway, you can't do much with the space left. So why not take up the whole screen? A lot of webpages and documents do not have a fixed correct size because they resize dynamically with the window.
 
Continued...

Video Players

There are several video players in OS X. Quicktime comes with OS X. The rest you have

to download yourself.

Quicktime: Not enough codecs by default. Bad interface, can't fullscreen unless you pay.

Niceplayer/Perian: Has a nice, minimal UI. Perian codec can't seek 720p videos without a long lag. Can't play 1080p videos smoothly (h264).

Movist: Same as above

VLC: Same as above, except with an ugly UI. Often crashes when seeking in 720p or above videos.

MPlayer OSX Extended: Can seek all videos fast. Cannot play 1080p smoothly.

Plex: The only player that can play 1080p smoothly. It's a media center, not player. Horrible controls, low audio. You definitely don't want to use it for anything other than 1080p.

The KMPlayer: The best player ever. Plays 1080p smoothly. Fast seeking, Beautiful and efficient UI, excellent support of subtitles and keyboard shortcuts. Not available for OS X. (Don't even think about running it in VMware. It won't help you).

Documents/Pictures/PDFs

Preview: There is no Next or Previous!. So you can't go through a folder of pictures in Finder! Quicklook is not a a solution. As soon as you click on somewhere else or another, unrelated file, it disappears or changes.

Also, there is no way to use the mouse scroll to zoom the document you're viewing. You either have to keep clicking the Zoom button or keep pressing a 3 key shortcut, and keep switching to the panning tool.

Editing Pictures: There is no good free painting app. Seashore is not as good as Paint.net for windows. Gimp looks ugly on OS X and is overkill.

Problems with other default Apps

Safari: No way to open last (accidentally) closed tab (without plugin). I'm not talking about sessions.

With multiple windows, you cannot drag a window into another Safari window as a tab unless the window you're dragging is also a tab. This is minor, but Google Chrome can do it. I mention this because since Safari already has the ability to merge windows with multiple tabs into tabs, it seems pretty stupid not to have be able to move a tabless window into a tabbed window.

iTunes: Takes any music file you have into its library. You have to use another player if you just want to test listen. (as a workaround, you can delete the file from library afterwards, but it's ugly).

iTunes has a feature to organize your music files based on metatags. Like anything Apple, it's not customizable. They always take the path of artist/album/songtitle. What if I want genre/composer/album/songtitle? It's also very hard to transfer your iTunes library to another player.

Photo Booth: There is no way to turn off the flashes and clicks when you take pictures. It gets annoying. It's even more ridiculous when what you're taking is not a self portrait. (Correction: Press Option for no countdown, Shift for no flash, can be combined. I guess the only way to find out about this was to Google it.)

iPhoto: More annoying than helpful for non-Photos. This is a problem, because there is no other good picture viewer for OS X. Also cannot create smart folders based on picture resolution.

Address Book: You need an iPhone/iPod to sync Google Contacts with Address Book, unless you do a workaround. I don't see the point.

Other Problems

QuickLook: No easy way to specify filetypes for quicklook. eg. .rb is a PLAINTEXT

file. You don't need to look at the extension to recognize a plaintext file. It should work in Quicklook.

No keyboard shortcut for Fast User Switching There is a shortcut for log-off. But not for fast user switching. It's would be useful when you're leaving your computer and want to lock it quickly. It makes more sense than having a shortcut for log-off because logging off is more permanent.

External Keyboard: Function key mapping (Cmd, Ctrl, Alt..etc) doesn't work very well on non-Apple keyboards. Sometimes right functions keys don't work. Sometimes they mess up the laptop keyboard. There is also no way to emulate the FN key on non-Apple keyboard.

Firefox/Safari Bookmarks: Middle clicking your bookmarks in the menu bar in Firefox or Safari does not open the link in a new tab. Could be a third-party issue. A big annoyance anyway. It might be possible that the OS's GUI framework limits this. Other than on links, middle click has no use in OS X anywhere.

Boot Camp is Crippled

Hard to right click with touchpad on windows. You need to hold 2 fingers on the touchpad, then press the mouse button.

2 finger scroll is choppy.

No middle click for touchpad.

No tapping for touchpad.

No quick way to disable touchpad while mouse is present. You can set it in Preferences....but then, if you forget and just unplug your mouse.. It's hard to go back to preferences to change it back.

After I removed bootcamp partition, I couldn't create another one without reformat. (tried repair, single user mode disk fix, defrag..etc) Doesn't happen a lot, but once is bad enough.

Hardware

If you don't want OS X, there is no reason to get the hardware.

One Button Touchpad: no longer a problem for newer glass pads, but very annoying if you do have it.

Bad LCD Screen: My Macbook's LCD has worse viewing angles than my $600 Lenovo NON-Thinkpad, from over a year ago. Friend with Macbook Pro has similar experience.

Low Resolution for the Screen Size: 1280x800 for 13.3" is semi-acceptable, 1440x900 for 15.4" is not! It should be at least 1680x1050, preferrably 1920x1200. If you think this is personal, then at least allow the option!! If PC laptops can do it, why can't Macs? (Yes, some PCs have even lower resolutions, but they don't cost $2000). I know some people don't need such high resolution. This doesn't mean you shouldn't have the option of having it.

Only 2 USB Ports: Even netbooks have 3.

Firewire is useless: unless you're doing high end video editing. OK, so new Macbooks got rid of firewire, but they STILL ONLY HAVE 2 USB PORTS!!!

No Microphone Port: The microphone port on the Macbook is a lie. It's an unamplified Line-in port. You cannot expect to plug in a microphone and have it work.

Cannot Boot From USB Drive. ...to be verified.

With All These Problems...

Do you really want a Mac? The only reason you should use Mac is if you're a rails programmer and can't live without TextMate. Or if you need the Unix shell, somehow hates Linux, and cygwin is not good enough for you.

I know what Mac fanatics are going to say: "If you can't do it in OS X, then you don't need to do it.", followed by a bunch of personal insults... Hopefully this post will at least warn users who are about to be "influenced to switch" of buying a Mac without knowing if they really need it.

All the Mac users, please point out any mistakes in the article. It really cannot be this dumb now, common.

Enter to rename!! Really!! The guy must have really gotten it wrong.

No cut option? Even DOS had that.
 
Atrocious!

This article is so inane and half-baked, makes me want to burn the foolish author.:mad: :mad:

Damn, i want my 5 minutes back.:mad:
 
Waiting for a mac fanboy to come and select random few points and start telling how stupid the author is and how less he knows..

Other fanboys will vehemently agree..

Rest of the people agree too cause they just want them to shut up, thread goes into oblivion..:lol:

OMG the first one is here:p
 
Yup Enter to rename and no cut alright. Infact most of the stuff is true. But what the heck, he's comparing it to windows, where's the list of stuff that windows can't do?

The thing is, when you write an article with a pre-biased view in mind, it turns out like this.

He's bashing spotlights much, windows doesn't even have a half decent search lol. Vista doesn't show up Applications, System Preferences, Emails, Calender Entries, Contacts, etc in its searches!
 
The Alchemist said:
Atrocious!
This article is so inane and half-baked, makes me want to burn the foolish author.:mad: :mad:
Damn, i want my 5 minutes back.:mad:
Just saying atrocious doesn't do mate. We need facts. Prove that the findings are wrong, and we will agree to that. But simply saying that the article is so inane and half baked is not done.
So you mean to say that Enter doesn's do rename? Or that you can restore deleted files to their original location?
 
The Plus Button: 1) There is no keyboard shortcut for it. 2)Sometimes it's useful, but other times the app can't judge the proper size. It's mostly inconsistent. Firefox just uses it to maximize.

The [+] button is really annoying. Why cant they just maximize every window using that button? Most of the time, the plus button will make the window to resize to an unusable size and ill have to manually drag it to full screen.. BS!!!
 
Anish said:
Yup Enter to rename and no cut alright. Infact most of the stuff is true. But what the heck, he's comparing it to windows, where's the list of stuff that windows can't do?

The thing is, when you write an article with a pre-biased view in mind, it turns out like this.

He's bashing spotlights much, windows doesn't even have a half decent search lol. Vista doesn't show up Applications, System Preferences, Emails, Calender Entries, Contacts, etc in its searches!

I'l just ask what are you smoking?:no:

Explore the features: Search and Organization

Windows Vista instantly searches file and application names, metadata, and the full text of all files, and groups your results by category: Programs; Favorites/Internet History; Files, including documents and media; and Communications, including e-mail, events, tasks, and contacts.

Infact the search feature is integrated into folder management to split into folders the various types of files you have..

Say you have 10 songs of eminem and 5 songs of 50cent and 10 of celene dion, then through the search you can arrange it into 3 different folders..

Try that in a mac and see..
 
All statements are true, but many are not so much an inconvenience if you start out as a Mac User rather than a PC user. But there are other far more serious problems with the OS X that probably the typical casual user may not come across. I have been into Mac OS X development for more than 4.5 years now and here are some serious flaws I think the OS X has.

Extremely bad font management.

Font Management is a pretty weak and stability bottle neck area for OS X. There is a lot of havoc even a small font issue can cause on Mac OS X.

On Windows, fonts work in a binary fashion. i.e to say They either work or do not work at all. You cannot have duplicates installed and Also any fonts needed by the operating system are locked by the OS so that you cannot mess around with them.

Not the case with Mac OS X. Fonts work in a fuzzy manner. They range from fully working to not working at all. But its the fuzzy area in between that more of a problem. A partially bad font can cause damage ranging an application crash to a complete boot failure. Also the OS does not do enough to lock fonts that are needed by the OS. Lucida Grande is one such font. Its required by the OS, but nothing stops someone from deliberately or accidentally moving/deleting from its location. But if you restart the OS in this state, the OS will not boot from that installation till you figure out some way to put back the font in its proper location. Similarly a duplicate of AppleGothic in any location other than /system/fonts can wreak havoc on the system. In this condition the font cache gets corrupted and you began to face random crashes all over the OS and applications. This is just small taste of how horrible the font issues can be on Mac. There are many other severe font related issues I have come across with the OS during the course of my work.

Poor Backward compatibility of Apps.

Most Windows apps developed developed over 10~15 years back work perfectly well even now. Not so with OS X. Apple has been in the habit of deprecating its API's/whole frameworks and updating them even in minor versions. This means that Apple has very little time to thoroughly test its SDK's leading to stability issues with the frameworks. Furthermore, at the pace at which they change things, chances are that a application that has been working perfectly well on revision of the OS may stop working in the next release unless the developer is active enough to release a patch to fix the app. This is a major headache for the developer considering this happens some times even for minor releases where they have broken some API that has been working fine in the previous revision. The lack of proper testing is also a major pain. developers often find them selves writing their own code instead of calling some OS provided API because its broken.

General Stability Problems.

Many people crib about the Stability of windows. Windows is developed and released as an OS intended to be used on a multitude of permutations and combination of hardware. So its bound to crash sometime or the other because of the randomness of the hardware. Most of the the times, its due to to badly written drivers or software. Still form my own experience, I have found Windows XP and Vista to be very stable platforms. Its the other way around with OS X. I have found OS X (starting from Tiger) to be quite unstable. I have encountered Finder/ Saffari crashes and third party applications crashing deep inside OS frameworks. On an avg I have to reboot by workstation (iMac-Intel and Power Mac G5 at least 2 times per day on avg because of stability issues. This is in spite of the fact that OS X has been developed keeping a very limited set of hardware combination's in mind. Another thing to note is that not once have I encountered a crash in any of the FreeBSD core of the OS. Its always in Apple developed parts that I have found such problems.
 
Pointless article. This article is written from the perspective of a geek, and let's get it clear that that OS X is not a geek OS. In fact, Apple hates geeks as is clear from most of its ads. So get over it, you guys.
 
interesting to see OS X invite the same amount of random rant as the iPhone does..

I Wonder how much free time the author had at hand
 
tracerbullet said:
In fact, Apple hates geeks as is clear from most of its ads. So get over it, you guys.

I would agree, They cannot fool geeks and make them buy crap (again and again ) through marketing gimmicks. :p
 
superczar said:
interesting to see OS X invite the same amount of random rant as the iPhone does..

I Wonder how much free time the author had at hand
Probably lesser than the Apple fanbois across the internet do.

And for the record, I'm a Windows user, but major Unix fan, and I don't hate Apple.
 
tracerbullet said:
Pointless article. This article is written from the perspective of a geek, and let's get it clear that that OS X is not a geek OS. In fact, Apple hates geeks as is clear from most of its ads. So get over it, you guys.
That might just be the dumbest thing I've heard. Yes, Apple isn't meant for people on the borderline of noob-ism and geekdom, but a system based on Unix can't possibly be geek unfriendly. It's the noobies who actually need ads to tell them what they should get, hence the lame Apple ads. Make no mistake though, Windows is by no means meant for geeks any more so than OS X. It's just that OSX has an easier learning curve for noobs.
 
Most of them are true, if you compare it with windows or linux. I do agree mac has its fair share of problems, but which OS doesn't? But having used right from windows linux and mac for a long time now, I do find Mac easier to work on, and more importantly, problem free.

Certain issues are very annoying though, but I've learned to overlook those, just like the ones in windows.
 
Most of what he has written is true, but it's not so much an inconvenience. One gets used to OSX rather quickly. There's a lot of nitpicking in there too...for example, the command+delete function; I mean, what does he do? Type with one finger? LOL!!
And like any OS, most of those inconveniences are solved by third party plugins, apple scripts etc. and who doesn't use plugins? I mean, just the other day I read a thread in which some user pointed out 'Firefox without plugins? LOL' (not verbatim), but you get the picture.

@Amien: Any useful input from you? :)
 
Yes there are somethings that are not so good in OSx , like the missing cut feature & the incompetent Trash , but there are some good things as well

Installing apps is a breeze

Firefox looks & works much better in OSX

Things look nice neat and Clean in OSX

Add ,VLC , Perian , WMV Codec, & a good VLC Skin & all your media playing worries are gone. Who the hell said VLC cant to 1080P & why ?

In OSX , Preview opens PDF, PSD & a host of other files by default, you can even save these to Jpeg from OSx without the need for seperate applications.

We can covert to PDf or JPEG any file that can be printed without using a 3rd party application.

Newer Macs ship with iLife & iWork preloaded , which makes em excellent value for money as you dont need expensive Microsoft Office and a plethora of other applications for Website making , Audio Editing, Picture Management etc.

Ever heard to things like Quicklook , just press spacebar & your file is ready for playing or previewing without launching the Application.

Many OSX feature have been copied by Windows , like Finder for Vista Explorer, Spotlight for Vista Start Menu Search, Dock for Win 7 Superbar, Dashboard for Vista Sidebar etc. etc.

Basically OSX users get future windows feature today.

I like to use a HAckintosh & i admit it is so much better than Windows XP. If i wasnt forced to use Autodesk Max 9 ( with works only on Windows XP ) i would prefer using all my Apps in OSX only !

Theoratically we have much lesser viruses, trojans & malware to deal with.

OSx Snow Leapord will me the worlds only true 64bit OS.


So each man to his own , i prefer using Windows for Gaming, Autodesk MAX etc & OSX ( Hack ) for Audio , Video & Web Browsing.

Hence i enjoy the best of both worlds.
 
can mac users customize their environment like we do in windows?

i mean using apps like windows blinds or custom themes we can make cosmetic changes to the look and feel of windows. is this possible in mac? just asking cause i dont know whether this is possible...
 
Back
Top