I honestly feel the Zotac version of the card has a more solid feel to it, also why don't you look at the new GTS 450SoulFire said:is the 1000 difference in cost for the hawk justified ? whats the max OC the cyclone reaches as compared to the hawk ?
--- Updated Post - Automerged ---
how about the Zotac AMP Edition card AMP! GeForce GTX 460 1GB 384-bit (810MHz/4000MHz) [ZT-40403-10P]
i believe this nicely OCed with 5 yrs warranty ?
Its a 2+3 yrs warranty. 2 yrs from Aditya infotech and 3 yrs direct from Zotac if u register within 15 days.SoulFire said:is the 1000 difference in cost for the hawk justified ? whats the max OC the cyclone reaches as compared to the hawk ?
--- Updated Post - Automerged ---
how about the Zotac AMP Edition card AMP! GeForce GTX 460 1GB 384-bit (810MHz/4000MHz) [ZT-40403-10P]
i believe this nicely OCed with 5 yrs warranty ?
chalega 5 yrs is still 5 yrs and whats the cost of that card, frankly i see 5 yrs being quite good is it freely available in the market whats the cost difference with the normal version coz both coolers r same on the AMP and normal version.DarkAngel said:Its a 2+3 yrs warranty. 2 yrs from Aditya infotech and 3 yrs direct from Zotac if u register within 15 days.
SoulFire said:chalega 5 yrs is still 5 yrs and whats the cost of that card, frankly i see 5 yrs being quite good is it freely available in the market whats the cost difference with the normal version coz both coolers r same on the AMP and normal version.
im still inclined towards the MSI but i would consider this seeing the cost.
No way the HD6850 will be here in 10 days. The Oct launch is just a paper launch and with mass availabilty only in mid-November. You can expect it to be here by late Nov or early Decemeber.SoulFire said:im told to wait 10 days to buy a gfx that the 6850 should be here which should be much more powerful than the 460, since i have onboard , 10 days is not really much of the wait , does that make sense or is that not so realistic ?
no you did not, i could run benchies but that means ill have to load an os 1st before i run a benchmark , i think ill use the seagateALPHA17 said:I think the Seagate drive is a better bet, or still if you are so doubtfull why don't you run benches on both and see for yourself. Hope I did not sound rude