Nintendo pulls Wii ads - claims "not required"
- Thread starter Ck Nish
- Start date
- Status
spindoctor
Explorer
Ck Nish said:I can imagine you as a teary eyed 6 year old while saying that. So, all is forgiven.
your imagination is your business. that's where the crap you spouted in your op came from right?
snoopfrog said:
Oh, I'm sorry. And the following is so intensely relevant.
snoopfrog said:
My god, that post reeked of more relevance than anything I've ever read, seen or heard. I do solemnly declare that you must indeed be awarded the most relevant poster member of the month award (a new TE Member of the Month category).
Why do I get the impression spin and snoop are the same person?
CK, do you have my back here?
spindoctor
Explorer
Haha, KK! What's up with random members taking shots at us in this thread anyway? Have we suddenly been elated to "trophy head" status that people want to have our heads on their wall?
Also, max respect for even knowing xkcd. What other comics do you read?
As opposed to your brilliant contributions in this thread? Seriously, if you're gonna shit all over my thread, try and have the decency to clean up after yourselves or at the very least, don't point out at someone else's supposed shit. Sheesh, you're 6 and still not potty trained?
Also, max respect for even knowing xkcd.
What other comics do you read?spindoctor said:
As opposed to your brilliant contributions in this thread? Seriously, if you're gonna shit all over my thread, try and have the decency to clean up after yourselves or at the very least, don't point out at someone else's supposed shit. Sheesh, you're 6 and still not potty trained?
spindoctor
Explorer
ok lets go back to the beginning. you point out where nintendo has claimed they don't need advertising for the wii. if you do, i admit my mistake. if you can't, then you were lying. simple, no?
You know. I could've just posted. "Nintendo - claims "We're the best because we don't need to try"" and follow it up with the topic post and it would still be valid.
Just how new are you to this internet thing that you are incapable of accepting topic titles with a little bit of flair in them? Seriously, most topics don't necessarily literally represent their contents. *gasp* I know. It's the internet, It's scandalous. Get used to it.
Just how new are you to this internet thing that you are incapable of accepting topic titles with a little bit of flair in them? Seriously, most topics don't necessarily literally represent their contents. *gasp* I know. It's the internet, It's scandalous. Get used to it.
spindoctor
Explorer
flair is not the same as factually incorrect.
if you had even said that 'nintendo pulls advertising because they don't need them as the world is buying every single one they can make' that would have been fine too. you deliberately misrepresented facts. i was just pointing that out. you took offence and started all this flaming, including personal attacks. so that begs the question, just how new are you to the internet to think that shit like that works?
i don't see the point in continuing this anymore. you are obviously not going to agree that what you posted was wrong, but that's ok by me because scoring points is not what i was after in the first place. if you still believe that nintendo has claimed what you said they did, well, good for you.
peace.
if you had even said that 'nintendo pulls advertising because they don't need them as the world is buying every single one they can make' that would have been fine too. you deliberately misrepresented facts. i was just pointing that out. you took offence and started all this flaming, including personal attacks. so that begs the question, just how new are you to the internet to think that shit like that works?
i don't see the point in continuing this anymore. you are obviously not going to agree that what you posted was wrong, but that's ok by me because scoring points is not what i was after in the first place. if you still believe that nintendo has claimed what you said they did, well, good for you.
peace.
Actually, what's clear is that the gist of this thread is lost on you and you're just going on factual correctness maybe to proclaim your rights as the "factual police" or maybe because you were originally clueless but after finally understanding, you decided on damage control rather than just accepting you were wrong and moving on. Either that or you're just a drama queen who takes offense to the lightest things and turns complete non-issues into issues. Whatever it is. Enjoy being a dick. You won't be missed.
Heck, m47r1m and KK even gave you the benefit of the doubt and tried to explain things nice and slowly for you to understand but their efforts were in vain. The truth was you entered this thread to flaunt your intolerance from the very beginning and nothing else.
Heck, m47r1m and KK even gave you the benefit of the doubt and tried to explain things nice and slowly for you to understand but their efforts were in vain. The truth was you entered this thread to flaunt your intolerance from the very beginning and nothing else.
spindoctor
Explorer
feeling better now?
clearly the way to win an argument is by flaming and name-calling. wouldn't want to let the facts get in the way of that eh?
clearly the way to win an argument is by flaming and name-calling. wouldn't want to let the facts get in the way of that eh?
- Status