Excellent points Shripad! Couldn't agree more! (Except android having plenty of apps in 1 year - which is absolutely false)
If I were Nokia's CEO, I would keep Lumia 710 for ~14k and Lumia 800 for ~19k. Take the losses for six months...and come out with stunning handsets with Apollo in 2nd/3rd Q of 2012. Nokia CAN NOT gather significant marketshare with such prices. Not a single Windows Phone handset deserves 20k+ price tag. And if they don't have enough marketshare, developers will not create enough apps - which will affect future marketshare coz no one wants to buy OS without good apps and games - which means they cannot price next gen handsets at a premium due to lack of demand....and the vicious cycle will continue. I would not take such a big risk (pricing so high) when I put all my eggs in Microsoft's basket.
And about the missing features, if MS does not add following features in Apollo -
mass storage mode, bluetooth transfer, file manager, good codec support and basic dumbphone level features such as easier ringtone support (not hundred conditions on file type and size etc), separate volume levels for ringtone, music player, alarm (I mean WTF?
)
then WP7 will never be mass market OS, at least not for Nokia.
Nokia is synonymous with such features and people will be royally pissed off when they see these things missing in a frikkin 30k phone! Don't give me reason that iPhone did not have it either and people didn't complain...well, Nokia != Apple...as simple as that.
And Elop should stop all the b***sh!t about why they chose to make Lumia 800 as it is. He gave cost and pricing strategy as reason for not including front camera! Really?? How stupid is that?
I was gonna replace my Focus with 800...but at this price - not a chance!