News NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Is 2x Faster Than 4080 At $999, RTX 5070 Ti 2x Faster Than 4070 Ti At $769, RTX 5070 Faster Than 4090 For $549

[Kaching999]

Hence after the launch of the 5070Ti one should go for that over the 4080 if you can find it for under 95k since it will have the same VRAM and will be only about 5% slower.

But if you want to spend less and still have the 16gb of VRAM the 4070 Ti super for about 74-78k is a much better choice in terms of value since it is going to be only about 8-10% slower.

The 5070 though should be a second choice to the 4070 Super, i.e if you can get the 4070 super for about 55-60k. And if you can spend a little bit more go for the 4070Ti if you don't care about MFG, but if you want MFG then teh the 5070 is probably going to cost around 70k seeing the current pricing trend for the 5080.

 

[HE-MAN]

RTX 5070Ti will cross 1 lakh mark easily. Given the horrendous pricing and performance of RTX 50 series nobody will sell RTX 40 series.. RTX 30 & 40 should skip this gen.. DLSS 4 in Performance preset has stretched the life of older Gpu's

 

[Skoomahed]

RTX 5070Ti will cross 1 lakh mark easily. Given the horrendous pricing and performance of RTX 50 series nobody will sell RTX 40 series.. RTX 30 & 40 should skip this gen.. DLSS 4 in Performance preset has stretched the life of older Gpu's

Damn, i was planning on getting the 5070 Ti. How long do you think it takes for the pricing to come down a little and become more stable? I am planning on building my pc sometime in june or july

 

[HE-MAN]

Damn, i was planning on getting the 5070 Ti. How long do you think it takes for the pricing to come down a little and become more stable? I am planning on building my pc sometime in june or july

Yes it will stabilize in due time maybe even before june...

 

[Kaching999]

This meme aged so well :

 

[Kaching999]

These explain a lot.

---

---

Nvidia's version of AFMF and Lossless Scaling called Nvidia Smooth Motion:

 

[Fenix]

Easy shopping par, lowest I saw was 1.47L for Gigabyte.

 

[gtlogic10]

Just the reality of Blackwell GPUs.

 

[satyanjoy]

how much upgrade will be RTX 5070 from RTX 3070 ?

 

[HE-MAN]

how much upgrade will be RTX 5070 from RTX 3070 ?

At the official price it will be good upgrade... Prices will messed up though

 

[Tracer_Bullet]

VRAM not enough, why make same mistake twice ? Better wait fro 18gb 5070 or look at competition.

 

[Kestya]

VRAM not enough, why make same mistake twice ? Better wait fro 18gb 5070 or look at competion.

how much upgrade will be RTX 5070 from RTX 3070 ?

I'm taking a conservative estimate of 10% faster than 4070 super. So roughly around 50-60% faster.

How much will it cost though with all the scalpers we will have to see...

VRAM issue overrated for the types of games I play, I really dont see this gen crossing over 16gb at 1440p unless you absolutely max out everything, in which case the 5070 doesnt have enough raster performance anyways. Would I prefer a higher vram card? Sure, but I'm not gonna pay extra for just peace of mind.

 

[PixelDew]

VRAM not enough, why make same mistake twice ? Better wait fro 18gb 5070 or look at competition.

Amd just isn't a consideration when we are approaching the 1 lakh price point. No decent upscaler and terrible raytracing performance just isn't worth considering at high end in my opinion. Also not everyone is playing at 4k, I'm at 1440p and 16GB seems fine to me, especially since I don't mind using upscaling in most games anyway given how good it looks.

 

[Tracer_Bullet]

Amd just isn't a consideration when we are approaching the 1 lakh price point. No decent upscaler and terrible raytracing performance just isn't worth considering at high end in my opinion. Also not everyone is playing at 4k, I'm at 1440p and 16GB seems fine to me, especially since I don't mind using upscaling in most games anyway given how good it looks.

yeah we always come up with excuses on how its enough, i did same for 3080. But soon it wont be, and why should i limit to a 1440p monitor with a 1L gpu, ridiculous.
4k 32 oled is a much better upgrade vs these crappy value compromised gpus - anyday.

We have chance of getting a 24gb 5080 once we have 3gb vram chips.
Yes AMD is not competitive until we have FSR4 ( which is good as per initial reports) and competitive RT at minimum. Rest of the features is more debatable esp vs compromised vram.

Someone who has to buy has no choice, perhaps can downgrade at best. But not much else.

Anyway, he asked for 5070 which has 12gb and has probably faced issues with his current 8gb card. Perhaps you believe nvidia bs of 4090=5070 ?

 

[PixelDew]

yeah we always come up with excuses on how its enough, i did same for 3080. But soon it wont be, and why should i limit to a 1440p monitor with a 1L gpu, ridiculous.
Good chance of getting a 24gb 5080 once we have 3gb vram chips.
Yes AMD is not competitive until we have FSR4 and competitive RT at minimum. Rest of the features is more debatable esp vs compromised vram.

Someone who has to buy has no choice, perhaps can downgrade at best. But not much else.

Anyway, he asked for 5070 which has 12gb and has probably faced issues with his current 8gb card.

No ones asking you to limit to a 1440p monitor lol I'm just saying not everyone buying a 4080 or 5080 is running 4k so 16GB VRAM isn't a limiting factor for those people. For the ones buying for 4K your options are either use lower upscaling to reduce vram or non-existent since again AMD might have vram but your games will look worse (not a compromise I would be willing to accept).

If he's asking about a 5070 I would assume he's at 1080p, so again I don't think 12GB is a problem at 1080p.
8GB on the 5060 is just unacceptable though, no card should have 8GB nowadays.

 

[Tracer_Bullet]

No ones asking you to limit to a 1440p monitor lol I'm just saying not everyone buying a 4080 or 5080 is running 4k so 16GB VRAM isn't a limiting factor for those people. For the ones buying for 4K your options are either use lower upscaling to reduce vram or non-existent since again AMD might have vram but your games will look worse (not a compromise I would be willing to accept).

yes, but in future your mind can change. I was playing at 1080p then went to 1440p and then 4k with a 3080. But anyway if you are happy with 16gb 5080 at 1.5L+ ( or even 1L imo) then you are ideal customer.
Below 4k perf, dlss is ugly af. Perf wasnt very usable either for me but new one might be. I just play older games now and with oled/hdr they can look much nicer.
Nothing worth upgrading from 3080 with reasonable value.

If he's asking about a 5070 I would assume he's at 1080p, so again I don't think 12GB is a problem at 1080p.

lol 5070 is a 1080p gpu now. ok man. That's what nvidia wants. First 4060ti and now 5070. Tomorrow 6080 will be a 1080p gpu for gamer peasants.

 

[PixelDew]

yes, but in future your mind can change. I was playing at 1080p then went to 1440p and then 4k with a 3080. But anyway if you are happy with 16gb 5080 at 1.5L+ then you are ideal customer.
Below 4k perf, dlss is ugly af. Perf wasnt very usable either for me but new one might be. I just play older games now and with oled/hdr they can look much nicer.
Nothing worth upgrading from 3080 with reasonable value.


lol 5070 is a 1080p gpu now. ok man. That's what nvidia wants.

I would never pay 1.5L for a 5080, but at 1.1L yeah I think it's the best GPU you can get right now. Could it have been better? Of course, but it is what it is. I'm happy at 1440p because 4K is too demanding imo, especially if you're not willing to buy new GPUs every generation or every other generation, which I'm not xD.

Well 5070 would be a 1080p gpu to me because I like high fps at the resolution I choose. I wouldn't buy a 12GB gpu for 1440p so if thats what he has then save up for a 5070 ti or accept the worse upscaling with AMD. No other choice really as upsetting as the reality is.

I'm not happy with what nvidia is doing but so long as the competitors aren't competing they are irrelevant to me and I will get an nvidia card. I won't buy a worse option to "fix" the market, AMD needs to have a Ryzen moment in the GPU space if they want to bring about change, it shouldn't be up to the customers to fight this by way of self-sacrifice.

 

[Fenix]

Pricing has so much disparity, FE 5080 is for 1L, while the lowest AIB card is for 1.47L. 5070Ti will touch 1L and above easily and 5070 will be in the 80s.

 

[Tracer_Bullet]

I would never pay 1.5L for a 5080, but at 1.1L yeah I think it's the best GPU you can get right now. Could it have been better? Of course, but it is what it is. I'm happy at 1440p because 4K is too demanding imo, especially if you're not willing to buy new GPUs every generation or every other generation, which I'm not xD.

I agree its probably best option (Or downgrade to 4070ti/5070ti.), but also is a compromised and incredibly terrible value card.
Next year they might release 24gb version and this would probably look pretty terrible in comparison say 4-5 years from now.

Nvidia is increasing prices in proportion to perf for 2nd time now.
We dont have to buy if old card is working, and that's what i am doing. I would never pay 1L for 16gb 5080. Would have been happy to pay 1L if price/perf and VRAM was acceptable.
This is nowhere close. Its a pretty laughable launch.

Well 5070 would be a 1080p gpu to me because I like high fps at the resolution I choose. I wouldn't buy a 12GB gpu for 1440p so if thats what he has then save up for a 5070 ti or accept the worse upscaling with AMD. No other choice really as upsetting as the reality is.

He has 3070, He can stay with it. AMD cards will be here in few months with acceptable vram and from what i have heard FSR4 is good.
At 1080p, i would say upscaling is not a good option, even DLSS can be terrible - blurry shit in control.

There are sooo many games that are not as demanding. We are not forced to do anything. On a case by case basis, priorities will change but overall demand for such shitty products should be lower that usual. If i don't get something i like, i don't buy out of compulsion.

 

[PixelDew]

Pricing has so much disparity, FE 5080 is for 1L, while the lowest AIB card is for 1.47L. 5070Ti will touch 1L and above easily and 5070 will be in the 80s.

The lowest AIB currently is 1.36L so I'm hoping after a week or two prices get better. If AMD cards are so good as they claim they really should capitalize on this paper launch, it's the best chance they're going to get with all the disgruntled nvidia buyers

I agree its probably best option (Or downgrade to 4070ti/5070ti.), but also is a compromised and incredibly terrible value card.
Next year they might release 24gb version and this would probably look pretty terrible in comparison say 4-5 years from now.

Nvidia is increasing prices in proportion to perf for 2nd time now.
We dont have to buy if old card is working, and that's what i am doing. I would never pay 1L for 16gb 5080. Would have been happy to pay 1L if price/perf was acceptable.
This is nowhere close. Its a pretty laughable launch.


He has 3070, He can stay with it. AMD cards will be here in few months with acceptable vram and from what i have heard FSR4 is good.
At 1080p, i would say upscaling is not a good option, even DLSS can be terrible - blurry shit in control.

Well I'm on a 2060 so I'm not really in the position to wait for next gen sadly. Also it's terrible value only if AMD doesn't also hit the generational uplift wall. From what I've read 3nm is going to cost a lot more so you'll get better performance but also expect pricing to go up. Until Nvidia or AMD are willing to eat into their profit margin nothing will change on either side.

Dlss at 1080p with the transformer model is great but even before that I think most people would take playable fps with dlss quality > fsr and both of them over sub 60 fps native.