I iml3g3nd Inactive Explorer Dec 26, 2008 #1 Nvidia Considers using GDDR5 memory on GT214 chip - Alien Babel Tech Reactions: 1 person
YoGi-Sama Inactive Galvanizer Dec 26, 2008 #3 Aman27deep said: why both ignore ddr4? Click to expand... Nope... I've HD3870 which uses GDDR4.
Aman27deep Herald Dec 27, 2008 #4 iGo said: Nope... I've HD3870 which uses GDDR4. Click to expand... oh i though everyone ignored it :bleh:
iGo said: Nope... I've HD3870 which uses GDDR4. Click to expand... oh i though everyone ignored it :bleh:
Udit Inactive Herald Dec 27, 2008 #5 Aman27deep said: oh i though everyone ignored it :bleh: Click to expand... X1950XTX, HD2600XT, HD3870 & 1 x Powercolor Model of HD3870X2 used it but everyone else avoided it
Aman27deep said: oh i though everyone ignored it :bleh: Click to expand... X1950XTX, HD2600XT, HD3870 & 1 x Powercolor Model of HD3870X2 used it but everyone else avoided it
rutvijt Inactive Contributor Dec 27, 2008 #6 iml3g3nd said: Nvidia Considers using GDDR5 memory on GT214 chip - Alien Babel Tech Click to expand... The Article says the GT214 will be a Mainstream GPU Solution. Does that mean it could be for the masses? (like HD4xxxx and Nvidia 8/9xxx series) In short, would it come under (say) 18-20k? Also, when is it to arrive?
iml3g3nd said: Nvidia Considers using GDDR5 memory on GT214 chip - Alien Babel Tech Click to expand... The Article says the GT214 will be a Mainstream GPU Solution. Does that mean it could be for the masses? (like HD4xxxx and Nvidia 8/9xxx series) In short, would it come under (say) 18-20k? Also, when is it to arrive?
L leomax Inactive Contributor Dec 28, 2008 #8 GT 214 will take the role of 9600's and 9800gt/8800gt. Interesting to see that nv has already evaluated gddr5 for g96.
GT 214 will take the role of 9600's and 9800gt/8800gt. Interesting to see that nv has already evaluated gddr5 for g96.
V Vandal Inactive Forerunner Jan 2, 2009 #9 Aman27deep said: i think i'll never know why both ignore ddr4? Click to expand... That's GDDR4. Because its crap. Didn't scale higher speeds than GDDR3 and the lats were much higher.
Aman27deep said: i think i'll never know why both ignore ddr4? Click to expand... That's GDDR4. Because its crap. Didn't scale higher speeds than GDDR3 and the lats were much higher.
