Graphic Cards RADEON X1900 benchmarks & pricing

Status
Not open for further replies.

dipdude

Inactive
Forerunner
Source : Hexus.net

A little earlier today my Fanny cracked opened the can, and spilt the green HEXUS.beans on the forthcoming NVIDIA GeForce 7900, so I thought it would be rude not to prepare you a large portion of red HEXUS.beans. We know you love em!

Piping hot ATi RADEON X1900 XTX 512MB and X1900 XT 512MB CrossFire benchmarks and pricing and more, are being served up over here.

Futuremark 3DMark 05

  • ATi RADEON X1900 XT 512MB CrossFire (625MHz VPU / 1450MHz GDDR-3) (not XTX) (AMD A64 FX-57 2.8GHz)
    ~13,501 3DMarks for $1098 (£622.01)
  • NVIDIA GeForce 7900 512MB (700MHz GPU / 1800MHz GDDR-3 (not GDDR-3+) (AMD A64 FX-60 2.8GHz)
    ~13,000 3DMarks (?)
  • NVIDIA GeForce GTX 512MB SLi (550MHz GPU / 1200MHz GDDR-3) (AMD A64 FX-57 2.8GHz)
    ~12,200 3DMarks for $1,439.61 (£815.58)
  • ATi RADEON X1800 XT 512MB CrossFire (625MHz VPU / 1500MHz GDDR-3) (MESH Computers TITAN X1800 FIRE - AMD A64 X2 4600+ 2.4GHz)
    ~12,050 3DMarks for $1071.16 (£606.78)
  • ATi RADEON X1900 XTX 512MB (650MHz VPU / 1550MHz GDDR-3) (AMD A64 FX-57 2.8GHz)
    ~11,149 3DMarks for $649 (£367.67)
  • NVIDIA GeForce GTX 512MB (580MHz VPU / 1703MHz GDDR-3) (ARMARI Pantheon-FX-2.8GHz)
    ~10,062 3DMarks
  • ATi RADEON X1900 XT 512MB (625MHz VPU / 1450MHz GDDR-3) (AMD A64 FX-57 2.8GHz)
    ~10,000 3DMarks for $549 (£311.04)
  • NVIDIA GeForce GTX 512MB (550MHz GPU / 1700MHz GDDR-3) (AMD A64 FX-57 2.8GHz)
    ~9,608 3DMarks for $719.81 (£407.79)
  • ATi RADEON X1800 XT 512MB (625MHz VPU / 1500MHz GDDR-3) (AMD A64 FX-57 2.8GHz)
    ~9,271 3DMarks for $535.56 (£303.39)
  • ATi RADEON X1800 XT 512MB (625MHz VPU / 1500MHz GDDR-3) (MESH Computers TITAN X1800 FIRE - AMD A64 X2 4600+ 2.4GHz)
    ~8,544 3DMarks

Sharp witted HEXUS readers will be thinking, what will this list look like when the inevitable R580 die shrink and frequency hike comes?…

Well, we’d like to tell you… however, when David introduced himself to ATi Technologies’ Director of Public Relocations, Chris Evenden at CES, and we asked whether he’d brief us (obviously under NDA) about what ATi had to show under wraps, Chris said that we’d have to wait until later this week when ATi officials came over to London. Odd we thought, as it’s well known that ATi’s North American PR often selectively disclose and leak information to at least one European publication.

In the absence of assistance from ATI's North American PR, we thought you guys would expect no less than for us to go digging up those special HEXUS.beans for you, but how ATi’s next, next generation is likely to perform we’ve not yet seen a sprout.

What we can say though is that so far there’s a distinct absence of the familiar ATi words ‘Platinum Edition’ (PE), which begs the question - what headroom does the existing 90nm R580 have for a PE version as a firm response to NVIDIA’s ultra-extreme GeForce 7900? It's gotta be on the cards...

Recent history shows that for two quarters of the year ATi will be on top and for the other two quarters it will be NVIDIA... So, if this trend continues, then from a 3D graphics performance enthusiast’s point of view, one of the primary decisions to be made is simply ‘in which quarter do you buy?’

If Fanny's HEXUS.bean on NVIDIA launching at CeBIT in March is as firmly planted as its partners seem to think so (whilst it’s not looking like a walkover), in Q1 2006 ATi seem set to rule the roost with it’s forthcoming RADEON X1900 (R580/Rodin).

What will the fullness of NVIDIA’s response be in a few months time, and will it be sufficient to head off an ATi RADEON X1900 XTX Platinum Edition?
 
HUH!!!

What the hell!!! How is the X1900XTX slower than the Geforce 7900?? Very very surprising.... I thought ATI is going to cream nVidia at least this time..... DAMN!!!
 
Nikhil.

If the x1800xt (90nm) couldnt keep up with the 7800GTX 512(110nm)

Which i think said enough, how did you expect the x1900xtx to beat a 90nm 7900????

XD....

650 dollars.. exactly the price i guessed :D...

NVIDIA GeForce 7900 512MB (700MHz GPU / 1800MHz GDDR-3 (not GDDR-3+) (AMD A64 FX-60 2.8GHz)

~13,000 3DMarks (?)

WTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
3d marks 05 is B$, in any case if R580 is the GPGPU monster with 48 ALU's then none of the current games will harness its power, UE3 will more likely show R580's prowess in ultra long pixel shaders.

BUT the prices are going up the roof, no point really. what matters are the cards in the range of 200-300$
 
^^ Thats to us here in India.

Not every1 in the US, would think so :)...

Plus the r580's 48 Pixel Operations are useless with it putting through only 16.

So its ont 3D Mark. I dont understand what ATi is playing at though.

I hope the image quality with the nVidia 7900's is improved though.

The ATi's own the nVidia's in IQ.
 
goldenfrag said:
^^ Thats to us here in India.
Not every1 in the US, would think so :)...
Plus the r580's 48 Pixel Operations are useless with it putting through only 16.
So its ont 3D Mark. I dont understand what ATi is playing at though.
I hope the image quality with the nVidia 7900's is improved though.
The ATi's own the nVidia's in IQ.
They are certainly not useless, they are just doing more work per clock. Also ATI and Nvidia's just sells 5% of its products over 300$ so its not just in India. And it pratically makes sense to buy a mid end video card then an high end, unless you have extra cash.
 
goldenfrag said:
^^ Thats to us here in India.
Not every1 in the US, would think so :)...
Plus the r580's 48 Pixel Operations are useless with it putting through only 16.
So its ont 3D Mark. I dont understand what ATi is playing at though.
I hope the image quality with the nVidia 7900's is improved though.
The ATi's own the nVidia's in IQ.

The last sentence U SAID IT PAL....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.