RTX 5060ti Official India Price starts at Rs 42,000

[PunkX 75]

If cherry-picking had a name and APPLE was taken it would have been called NVIDIA. Notice how they made RTX 20 series be the baseline here. Like we all enabled RT on 20 series lol. Look at that 5.7/5.8x multiplier. SO MUCH FPS WOW. No way, RTX 5060 TI is going to be 5.8 times better than RTX 2060 Super in RT?. Just amazing performance. And let's not talk about Resident Evil 4 here.
Also this is what it says below the graph "1440p, Max Settings, DLSS Super Resolution and DLSS Ray Reconstruction on 50, 40, 30, and 20 Series. Frame Gen on 40 Series. Multi Frame Gen (4X Mode) on 50 Series. RTX 5060 Ti and 4060 Ti 16GB models."
Frame gen on 40 series and whatever this multi frame gen crap on 50 series. Yeah buddy real frames lets go. Also nitpicked higher VRAM variants of the same cards to be able to actually launch the game to do the benchmark.
I can bet half the games would have shit the bed with so many "features" enabled.

View attachment 231094

4060ti = 2x 3060ti - yeah right.

The only comparison to look at here is for RE4. Says enough.

 

[YeAhx]

The only comparison to look at here is for RE4. Says enough.

The only reason I didn't focus too much on it is because then I would be doing the same thing NVIDIA is doing. Cherry-picking.
I don't know why RE4 has such minimal upgrade in performance for all generations, Maybe it doesn't like RT running or maybe instead it's the engine's limitation.

 

[PunkX 75]

The only reason I didn't focus too much on it is because then I would be doing the same thing NVIDIA is doing. Cherry-picking.
I don't know why RE4 has such minimal upgrade in performance for all generations, Maybe it doesn't like RT running or maybe instead it's the engine's limitation.

Because they haven't used DLSS/frame gen in that particular benchmark, if you notice. It's a much fairer comparison.

 

[lambda]

BTW whats with spaces between each sentences.

Two different posts/comments merged into one.

But yes, the spacing is intentional, makes it easier to read.

 

[PunkX 75]

3060 - 12 GB
5060 - 8 GB
If this isn't progress, i don't know what is.

 

[lambda]

Difference is DLSS still delivers with NO fake frames. Fake frames to anyone who has gamed before is very noticeable and annoying (perhaps my personal take but I'm not alone here).

We are just arguing about the quality of these frames. It's a software feature at the end of the day.

With that said, the 5060ti looks like a decent card to me in isolation. You get the Nvidia compute stack (CUDA), 16GB VRAM and the latest tech.

The next decent jump is 5070ti purely in terms of compute with a proper upgrade being the 5090 with 32GB VRAM.

But again, if you only cared about compute/CUDA then the 4060ti 16GB has been available for years.

 

[YeAhx]

Because they haven't used DLSS/frame gen in that particular benchmark, if you notice. It's a much fairer comparison.

Holy crap dude you are right, How come I didn't notice that. I knew this Multi Frame Gen 4X mode was doing the heavy lifting but this much? At this point it looks like they included the RE4 benchmark just to not catch flak when people find out RTX 5060ti isn't that good without DLSS4. In a "look guys we included a non-DLSS4 benchmark as well, we weren't lying" way.

3060 - 12 GB
5060 - 8 GB
If this isn't progress, i don't know what is.

3060 would have been such a good card if it had performance of 3060ti.

We are just arguing about the quality of these frames. It's a software feature at the end of the day.

With that said, the 5060ti looks like a decent card to me in isolation. You get the Nvidia compute stack (CUDA), 16GB VRAM and the latest tech.

The next decent jump is 5070ti purely in terms of compute with a proper upgrade being the 5090 with 32GB VRAM.

But again, if you only cared about compute/CUDA then the 4060ti 16GB has been available for years.

You are right about one thing though, NVIDIA won't be doomed because of DLSS (or whatever new thing they feature next). They have simply gained too good of a market and are large enough to push R&D to stay that way. It feels like AMD is just one step behind, always but it's a bit more than that. CUDA is definitely one of the reason. I also think NVIDIA knows they can get by without higher VRAM on their consumer cards so they are doing so, If need be they will up the capacity to counter their competitors line up.

 

[Broly4878]

47k i am not gpu expert can we buy like 7800xt around 50k? or 7900gre at 55 or so?

 

[lambda]

They have simply gained too good of a market and are large enough to push R&D to stay that way. It feels like AMD is just one step behind, always but it's a bit more than that. CUDA is definitely one of the reason. I also think NVIDIA knows they can get by without higher VRAM on their consumer cards so they are doing so, If need be they will up the capacity to counter their competitors line up.

AMD is nowhere near Nvidia in terms of a proper compute stack. ROCm is largely a joke and not an industry standard, just look at their official documentation.

On the consumer side only the 7900 series of GPUs are supported.

System requirements (Linux) — ROCm installation (Linux)

System requirements for AMD ROCm

rocm.docs.amd.com

Compare this to Nvidia - https://developer.nvidia.com/cuda-gpus

Infact the xx60 series of GPUs occasionally beat AMDs high end in Blender rendering due to abysmal software support.

Gaming is ok on AMD but they lacked a proper DLSS competitor until recently. And no, open-source driver stack or whatever is not an alternative to a fully functioning closed source stack.

Nv 5060ti is a good compute card on the consumer side for a okish price. AMD does not have a competitor since the 9070 series is not officially supported in ROCm (sure, it'll work but no official support).

 

[ishashank]

NVIDIA = RIVERMind , Plus and VIP tiers with 8x MFG coming soon for "common people"

 

[Div]

Anyone have a clue when will the laptops and 5050 arrive?

 

[YeAhx]

Anyone have a clue when will the laptops and 5050 arrive?

I think you are better of directly asking laptop manufacturers this question. Write an email and CC to every support email address you can find.

 

[lambda]

Retail pricing is a joke, there's a single Zotac model for 48k and it's out of stock.

The next cheapest 16GB model is 60k.

60k for a xx60 series GPU is unheard of, it used to be around 30k.

 

[bssunilreddy]

Retail pricing is a joke, there's a single Zotac model for 48k and it's out of stock.

The next cheapest 16GB model is 60k.

60k for a xx60 series GPU is unheard of, it used to be around 30k.

Exactly. Nowadays everything is a joke.
What the price of 16GB 5060 Ti? It's 56k while 8GB 5060 Ti is 50k. Normally what these should be?

 

[horizonrays]

Amd / Radeon once produced cards that were better than Nvidia ! Lack of competition stops innovation and prices go up.

 

[gtx10606gig]

It gets even worse. The 5060Ti starts at 50k, and some variants trespass into (wait for it) 5070 AND 9070 territory. Just a few months ago, you could have bought an RX 7900GRE for that money. Now, you get a measly 128-bit card with performance about as good as an RX 7700XT in raster. Just take the L, Jensen, you've screwed over a market that was once your pocket borough (and kinda still is).

Exactly. Nowadays everything is a joke.
What the price of 16GB 5060 Ti? It's 56k while 8GB 5060 Ti is 50k. Normally what these should be?

These should be priced at 35k (for the 8gig) and 40k (for the 16gig) to even be considered a value uplift. EDIT: Sorry brother, had some server issues.

 

[buzz88]

These GPUs would be called 5050 or even worse if Nvidia had any integrity.

 

[PunkX 75]

The 5060 Ti 16G is slightly faster than a 7700XT in raster at 1440p.

With RT, it's around the same ballpark as a 9070 (non-XT)/4070/3080 at 1440p.

 

[AlphaSkull]

just checked the prices for 5060ti and my god its a laughing stock.
the cheapest 16gb card is 49500 and from zotac. And msi inspire is 52k 8gb and their vangaurd is 62k for 16gb(prices from pcstudio).