0-20k Rtx 5080 with 5600x at 1440p

At first I only saw the 7800X3D image and thought it must be thinking about 9800X3D since that will indeed perform better at 1080p thus 7800X3D being a "bottleneck"
Oh, the 9800x3d does perform "better", but STILL a bottleneck :dead:

1.png







But wait, the 5950X is better!

1.png



Here's the equalizer - a 14700K beats the 9800X3D :cigar:


1.png
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: YeAhx
If only AMD launched 5950x3D, id have bought it without hesitation. OP should get 10-20% improvement overall and more on the 1% low with 5700x3d for sure.
 
I have a question. I have a Samsung galaxy book pro 4 360 with an oled panel, if I stream from my main pc using Apollo/Sunshine and moonlight, will the picture quality be same as if I was running an oled monitor directly to my main pc. This will be over ethernet with a bit rate of around 100 Mbps. It will help my decision to get an oled if I can see the performance beforehand. Thanks
 
I have a question. I have a Samsung galaxy book pro 4 360 with an oled panel, if I stream from my main pc using Apollo/Sunshine and moonlight, will the picture quality be same as if I was running an oled monitor directly to my main pc. This will be over ethernet with a bit rate of around 100 Mbps. It will help my decision to get an oled if I can see the performance beforehand. Thanks
Try it for yourself, usually latency & picture quality are issues with streaming.
 
I have a question. I have a Samsung galaxy book pro 4 360 with an oled panel, if I stream from my main pc using Apollo/Sunshine and moonlight, will the picture quality be same as if I was running an oled monitor directly to my main pc. This will be over ethernet with a bit rate of around 100 Mbps. It will help my decision to get an oled if I can see the performance beforehand. Thanks
It has HDMI 2.1 so you can directly attach to it from the PC case.
 
It has HDMI 2.1 so you can directly attach to it from the PC case.
My understanding was that the hdmi port only does display output to other display.
Try it for yourself, usually latency & picture quality are issues with streaming.
I have tried it, my query is whether the streaming at 100 mbps , the picture quality is representative of how it would look on a OLED display if it is connected directly.
 
My understanding was that the hdmi port only does display output to other display.
Nah you can use it as main output as well. In fact newer HDMI is better than Displayport.

I have tried it, my query is whether the streaming at 100 mbps , the picture quality is representative of how it would look on a OLED display if it is connected directly.
It should. Also you will be using the WIFI if you are doing local streaming. So your internet speed won't matter.
 
Nah you can use it as main output as well. In fact newer HDMI is better than Displayport.


It should. Also you will be using the WIFI if you are doing local streaming. So your internet speed won't matter.
I meant the HDMI 2.1 port on my laptop is output only. It wont display my Main pc.
My laptop is also connected through ethernet.
 
I meant the HDMI 2.1 port on my laptop is output only. It wont display my Main pc.
My laptop is also connected through ethernet.
That sucks, I didn't get it at first. Streaming through ethernet will be rock solid (that is assuming Apollo/Sunshine/moonshine etc supports it which i think they do) but like @OMEGA44-XT has said, you will have to try it.
 
Upgrade to 5700x3d + RTX 5080 done. 2x framerate in Star Wars Outlaws . 3x with 2x Frame Gen.
My CPU timespy score is 10173 which is lower than what I saw online. If anyone that has this can confirm their score?

Also undervolted 5700x3d -30 all cores.
RTX 5080 undervolted and overclocked to 3000 Mhz at 20 watts below stock power draw.
 
Upgrade to 5700x3d + RTX 5080 done. 2x framerate in Star Wars Outlaws . 3x with 2x Frame Gen.
My CPU timespy score is 10173 which is lower than what I saw online. If anyone that has this can confirm their score?

Also undervolted 5700x3d -30 all cores.
RTX 5080 undervolted and overclocked to 3000 Mhz at 20 watts below stock power draw.
I got 11205 CPU score on first run where GPU was limited to 70% power and 10883 on second run where GPU was at 100% power. Not sure why lower score on second run because average clock frequency stayed the same for both runs (4,039 MHz) although temp was a few degree higher on second run. -30 all core UV.

Your CPU seems to be slightly under performing indeed. Can you check and tell me what was the average clock frequency and temp?

Screenshots attached.
GPU UV+UC.jpg

GPU FULL.jpg
 

Attachments

  • GPU UV+UC.jpg
    GPU UV+UC.jpg
    219.1 KB · Views: 2
I got 11205 CPU score on first run where GPU was limited to 70% power and 10883 on second run where GPU was at 100% power. Not sure why lower score on second run because average clock frequency stayed the same for both runs (4,039 MHz) although temp was a few degree higher on second run. -30 all core UV.

Your CPU seems to be slightly under performing indeed. Can you check and tell me what was the average clock frequency and temp?

Screenshots attached.
1745871194866.png

1745871229255.png


Frequency seems to be locked at 4049 Mhz and the temps were mid 50s with the end spike to around 59C