Sansa Clip+ vs Nationite n2 buy

Status
Not open for further replies.

freeze

Contributor
i had a sansa clip+ but is history now :(
i desperately need a new music player now, but am very confused between the sansa clip+ and the Nationite n2 :|

If you have experienced/know about these two players, put down what you know about these players and what in your opinion would make either one of the two the better player.

i liked everything about the sansa clip+ apart from its battery life, i hear the n2's battery lasts longer and sounds incomparably better than the sansa clip+.
 
I am not sure about the sound quality (quite neutral in the case of Clip+) but the N2 does have a better battery life than a Clip+ and more power to drive higher impedance earphones/headphones.

OT, strange that no one among TE's audiophiles did a review on this player.
 
Sorry Guys, I replied to his PMs before this thread was started. So here's our conversation:

aman.pitbull said:
N2s UI is an headache, I think if I had used it for > 2months or so it would've definitely spoiled my eyes. Audio quality is good but overall Clip+ is still a better player.

For example, Clip+ plays almost every format I've ever put in(even some VIDEO FILES!!!!!), whereas N2 gave me some problems with FLAC I had to remove all the Tags from them to make em work.

Apart from that N2 has some problems with different File Systems(gave me some problem with FAT/FAT32!!!) and it even gives some problems with class-4 Micro-SD.

N2 should be bought only if you're planning to use it with headphones rated >=80ohms, else buy a Clip+. The best thing about N2 is it's bundled IEMs, they are really good and make it a fantastic deal.

Clip+ has a slightly better build compared to N2 and has a very useful clip on it.

[quote name='freeze']I had my old 2gb clip+ rockboxed it showed that the battery was gonna last about 15 hours 15 mins.. i find that much rather convinient :) so the n2 does not support gapless playback? :( otherwise how is the UI in general? good enough? just the fact that the n2 sounds so much better makes me wanna go for that instead :)

[quote name='aman.pitbull']None of them support Gapless but Sansa's cross-fading is good enough which is absent in N2, the two things in which N2 beats Clip+ completely are EQ and battery life.

N2 is not slow at all, it's pretty quick.

No support for file tagging in N2 :( .

Clip+ is a better overall player. Since you've used clip+ you'll find it easier to adjust to, but remember to ROCKBOX it, as a result the battery life will be > 18hrs.

Cheers.

[quote name='freeze']Just some time back my sansa clip+ was stomped all over and is history, i need a new player and fast...

i just need to confirm a few things about this player from you

1)does it support gap-less playback of files?

2)Is the UI sluggish while navigating from file to file?

3)does it support file tagging?

I have the sound magic pl30, would you recommend this player to me? i need a decent UI, preferably with a library... i wouldn't like to have a device which responds slowly.

if you have used the sansa clip+ please give me the pros and cons of this player. i'm considering this player because its said to produce better sound quality and the battery lasts a little longer compared to the sansa clip+

Thanks :)
[/QUOTE][/QUOTE][/QUOTE]
 
From purely SQ point of view I personally found the N2 to be better sounding than the Clip+ . Especially the soundstage was definitely better . With almost all the IEMs I tried with N2 , ie - TF10,RE262,Brainwavz M2 /M3 they sound better than my Fuze which sounds same as the Clip+. The high impedance IEMs like RE262 benefit a lot with N2s amping power.

Also the custom EQ / BBE settings on the N2 do help in getting that missing factor from a particular earphone . Like with TF10 I could bring up the mids and do the same with bass and treble when using RE262 . The custom EQ on Clip+ isn't as good . Battery life of N2 is also definitely better than the Clip+ by 3-4 hrs .

In UI and form factor department , Clip+ wins by a good margin due to slightly bigger screen , more easy to use buttons etc . Having said that , the N2 UI isn't very crappy or bad .Its fairly decent , takes some time getting used but its still much better than using a Nationite Sflo UI .

I haven't had any issues with FLAC files etc. The only issue I had faced 2-3 times is random lock ups/ freezing when using 8GB microSD card .It was solved with a reset.

Overall for the performance it offers for the price, the N2 is definitely a good player provided it suits your requirements. The Clip+ is more versatile and a perfect match box sized jukebox whereas the N2 is targeted at a particular segment of audiophile buyers who don't mind compromising on the UI etc for slightly more power and better SQ.
 
Nice,

does the n2 support folder browsing as well?

FaH33m said:
From purely SQ point of view I personally found the N2 to be better sounding than the Clip+ . Especially the soundstage was definitely better . With almost all the IEMs I tried with N2 , ie - TF10,RE262,Brainwavz M2 /M3 they sound better than my Fuze which sounds same as the Clip+. The high impedance IEMs like RE262 benefit a lot with N2s amping power.

Also the custom EQ / BBE settings on the N2 do help in getting that missing factor from a particular earphone . Like with TF10 I could bring up the mids and do the same with bass and treble when using RE262 . The custom EQ on Clip+ isn't as good . Battery life of N2 is also definitely better than the Clip+ by 3-4 hrs .

In UI and form factor department , Clip+ wins by a good margin due to slightly bigger screen , more easy to use buttons etc . Having said that , the N2 UI isn't very crappy or bad .Its fairly decent , takes some time getting used but its still much better than using a Nationite Sflo UI .

I haven't had any issues with FLAC files etc. The only issue I had faced 2-3 times is random lock ups/ freezing when using 8GB microSD card .It was solved with a reset.

Overall for the performance it offers for the price, the N2 is definitely a good player provided it suits your requirements. The Clip+ is more versatile and a perfect match box sized jukebox whereas the N2 is targeted at a particular segment of audiophile buyers who don't mind compromising on the UI etc for slightly more power and better SQ.
 
^ +1 . No tag browsing , only folders .Can be little irritating for files with long names , starting with the album name :P
 
That should be fine, as long as i can organise the music to a decent level :P

but the gapless playback shouldn't be something very irritating i hope. Anyway thanks alot
 
I have some of the Pink Floyd albums and Opeth albums, which are gapless and frankly, even a tiny second of pause between tracks kills the flow. If you are like me, yes! lack of gapless can be a bit irritating. Otherwise, not!
 
I remember while transferring music to iPods via iTunes there was an option to select gapless for an album . Worked so perfectly for all those live sets I would download and split using a cue splitter.
 
esanthosh said:
I have some of the Pink Floyd albums and Opeth albums, which are gapless and frankly, even a tiny second of pause between tracks kills the flow. If you are like me, yes! lack of gapless can be a bit irritating. Otherwise, not!

by gapless here, do u mean the tracks play one after the other or actual holds in between the tracks??
 
Gapless albums tend to "flow" from end of one track into beginning of another. For an album which is not gap-less, a second's gap between tracks does nothing. But, with gapless albums, the gap between tracks interrupts the seamless flow or continuation, like a pause introduced in the middle of a song.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.