Storage Solutions Seagate 320 GB 7200.10 16MB in Mumbai?

Status
Not open for further replies.
x86 said:
Guys I'm in a topsy-turvy land which HDD to buy.
Eazy whats the full specs of the hitachi one with any special things to look for, and how many plates it has?

1> Shud 5 mbps more speed of the 7200.10 series really matter in games or say when the HDD is full?
2> Which will perform better when full or say near full?
3> really which one shud i gamble one?
There is no real reason I use Hitachi HDDs .... just have a feeling about these HDDs being good. I now have 8 Hitachi HDDs with not a single hiccup from any of them. My oldest Hitachi is a 80GB which I bought 3 years back.

The Hitachi T7K500 320GB HDDs features are more or less identical to the Seagate 7200.10 320GB HDDs.... they are both 2 platter HDDs .... except for the perpendicular recording feature of Seagate. In the Storagereview forums the Gurus there mention that the Hitachi HDDs "firmware" is much better than the Seagates and they mention this as a major plus point in the HItachi HDDs favour. I dont know what this firmware betterness means and how it influences the working of the HDD. Maybe someone here can throw some light on this.

About your question of how well the HDDs will work when nearly full I would suggest you check the charts in the HDTach thread and observe the speeds near the ending. I have put up a screenie for the HDTach on the HItachi and I thing Apo and Chaos and others have put for the Seagates.
 
@eazy..ur right, the one i got is the T7K500..says so on the Hitachi website.

HDtach comparos

seagate 7200.10 8mb buff:

hitachi t7k500 16mb buff:
 
D00d you'll find differing opinions about HDDs everywhere....

one of our TC maxtors just failed...of course the drive too a crash from the desk before it stopped working :P

I've got 2 maxtors in my 3 PCs, one a year old, the other 2 yrs old, both SATAs, no issues so far...they get hot sure, but run well
 
Seems like the Cpu Utilization of Hitachi is pretty higher (4% as opposed to 2%), as i'm on opteron 146 and wont upgrade atleast for next 2 years and will game pretty well , wont the utilization effect performance on a noticable level?
 
x86 said:
Seems like the Cpu Utilization of Hitachi is pretty higher (4% as opposed to 2%), as i'm on opteron 146 and wont upgrade atleast for next 2 years and will game pretty well , wont the utilization effect performance on a noticable level?

NAH.... its not 4% on my system..... its 8% !! :O

But this high CPU usage does not show in the readings I have on my desktop - I have Samurize running and this shows CPU usage in real time and I have never seen this reflect the 8% CPU usage for the HDD as shown by HDTach. I run an AMD 939 3000+ on an A8N-E MoBo at stock speed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.