Trying to figure out why he wants a snapdragon in the first place.
Actually I don't care much about a custom ROM, yeah if ARHD was available for S5 then it'd be great, but it isn't.
Does not need ROMS.
Nothing can be done for KNOX, that bloody infectious thing will just remain there.
no problems with KNOX since he does not need ROMs. Does not care about warranty either.
All I know that, if I get the S5, I will be getting an awesome display, very good battery life, nice camera and top notch hardware (however I don't play any games, so I don't know how that'd affect me) and an IP67 certified unit.
Does not need Adreno and its not a problem that the Mali GPU that comes with exynos does not support games as well as Adreno. Easier to optimise games for Adreno than Mali.
So why does he want a snapdragon?
What I need is a good kernel, and yes, there are few for S5, like Faux, Ktoonsez etc. I need the "interactive" governor to work properly, that's all. With that Governor I find Android to work very smoothly, smoothest actually. So that's a plus. However the problems / bugs of S4 are still there and I am amused by that. If I use a custom kernel, which I will use anyway, I will loose the Screen Mirroring functionality, just like S4. It's just a glimpse of what other problems I might / will be facing. Private mode won't work with root, S-Health won't work with Xposed installed and so on so on......! WOW Samsung, BRAVO.
So does anyone know if its possible to get this kernel with its interactive governor on exnos ?
Are there any reasons you want snapdragon other than this ?
I feel uncomfortable to hold on to big phones. I send emails / messages to my clients a lot and I use Swype, so I only care about one hand usage. I have never used any phone in landscape to type. Honestly I had a Tasker profile which I had set that when I went outside my home the phone would disable the screen auto rotation feature, so that I can only use Portrait view outside. Tasker did that by checking whether I was in my home's WiFi range or not and it worked excellently every time.
So you're a portrait typer. Isn't it easier to type with both hands in portrait on a larger screen ? Swpe i suppose enforces one hand usage and its difficult to use both hands. Is Swpe is the reason you want one handed typing, is swpe preventing you from geting a bigger screen.
clearly portability isn't a problem for you. Why this requirement of one hand only that too just for typing. It's easier yes but also easy for phone to slip out of your hand too.
Also I like thick phones. Cause if personal experience has taught me anything then thick phones are more comfortable to hold on to than slim phones, like S4. Also vibration intensity of thick phones are much better than slim phones, however I might not care about that any more with the introduction of Sony's Smart band.
That smart band ends up in the drawer after a couple of days. Don't know many that use it much.
The vibration intensity thing is curious. Thicker is easier to feel but why is it so important. How could you miss it if it vibrates, whether thick or thin will work, right data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dcac/7dcac283ae5e078e1182a0e66332aebad456125b" alt="Smile :) :)"
And yes, I was in that group of getting used with too. First really big phone I had was the Xperia X1, which back at that time was HUGE. Then gradually I got used with even bigger phones, like Samsung Jet, Omnia HD, then S2 and then finally the Note 2. Note 2 actually taught me my sweet spot and it is the size of S4. I honestly don't know if I could handle any bigger size than S4. Eh
It seems your ideal form factor range is moto x - s5.
I know dude, I know. But God knows when that will be announced, then how long will we Indians have to wait to get it. I can't really use the Nokia 1200 any more.
If moto g & e are any indication then as soon as it is launched elsewhere. Aug is when moto x came out.
I don't understand this part. Are you saying Moto X is as fragile as S4 or ... ?
I wondered whether you thought the moto x was constructed similar to the s4. I've always heard it was well built. There will be no fragility problems with moto x as you experienced with S4.
I don't think I will get ripped off. Well chances are there, as I don't believe any seller any more regardless of their feedback and all.
What are your options in case it happens ? this really is the only thing you have to ensure before getting in to the deal.
10-11 months. I try to use a phone for one year, but ultimately I can't. The longest phone I have used was the Galaxy S2, I used it for 16½ months!
Whatever I get it will be my 28th phone, and if I pay 40000 for S5 then officially I will be spending 2 millions. Yeah, I am weird, I am keeping and updating the notepad file I have from 2002, the year when I bought my first phone! How dumb am I really? Spending a ridiculous amount behind some toys!!!
What stops you from holding onto a phone for more than one year. Do you get tempted with new offerings. Since you buy at the flagship level there should be no performance issues for at least 2 years if not longer.
Note 2 you had problems with the size. S4 had its own issues. So i would discount these. But if you got a phone that performed to your expectations, was the right size and no stability problems, why wouldn't you hold onto it for longer than a year.
Want VFM with smartphones, depending on budget and preference
- keep a flagship for 4 years
- keep a midrange for 3 years
- keep a capable entry level for 2 years
After 2 years a flasgship will be matched by midrange.
After 2 years a midrange will be matched by entry level.
After 4 years a flagship is matched by entry level.