Exactly. futiristic i wish i cud have afford tht 850watts pcpower and cooling anyways so does this means neo he is weak for 8900ultra?goldenfrag said:Yea, but im only looking at the Future, as i wont upgrade the PSU too often.
Cards like the x2900xtx, 8900gtx, blah blah..
Exactly. futiristic i wish i cud have afford tht 850watts pcpower and cooling anyways so does this means neo he is weak for 8900ultra? and why neo he's r weak for cf's?goldenfrag said:Yea, but im only looking at the Future, as i wont upgrade the PSU too often.
Cards like the x2900xtx, 8900gtx, blah blah..
Asus A8R-32 MVP Deluxe board powered with RD580 chipset can even work with multi rail OCZ 600 W or Akasa 650W PSU as we guess it is distributing the power better than the previous one.
Inq said:It turns out that we were barking up the wrong tree. For example, sources close to Asus told us that some of reviewers had problems with single rail PSU and had to change to dual rail to make the RD580 boards work. We had it the other way around with RD480 boards.
The essence of the problem actually lies within the big four, Intel, AMD, Nvidia and ATI. They are all guilty for going too far, too fast with power specifications, in order to reach the performance crown, of course. For example, the ATX 2.0 specification requires two 12V power rails or more and some of the manufacturers designed two rail designs at around 20 amperes per rail. The problem is that Intel's Extreme Edition or Athlon FX60 can easily reach that. We learned that Intel's latest Extreme edition draws 22 to 23 amperes of its default 3.73 GHz clock speed. As soon as you overclock the same CPU at 4.4 GHz your CPU will draw as much as 28 to 30 amperes but this number includes all the fans and the pumps that you need to keep the beast cool.