FS: Storage Hardware SSDs: Crucial MX500 1000GB 2.5in SATA, Crucial MX300 525GB 2.5in SATA, Samsung 970 EVO 250GB NVMe m.2

ajish65

ajish65

Patron
Feedback: 39 / 0 / 0
Expected Price (Rs)
2
Shipping from
New Delhi
Item Condition
4 out of 5
Payment Options
  1. Cash
  2. Bank Transfer
Purchase Date
Jul 1, 2017
Shipping Charges
Included in cost
Have you provided two pics?
  1. Yes
Remaining Warranty Period
N/A
Invoice Available?
No
Reason for Sale
Upgraded
Hello everyone,

I upgraded my storage a while back and these have been lying packed ever since. No longer needed. The EVO packaging has a tear in it (can be seen in one of the pics) but the SSD itself is fine and in working condition. Will pack all SSDs well before shipping.

Bought at different times between 2017-18 so I doubt there's any official warranty. Cannot provide any performance screenshots as these are out of my system. Will provide 1 week (date of delivery + 7 days) testing warranty instead.

Expected prices:
Samsung 970 EVO 250GB NVMe m.2- Rs. 3,000/- shipped

Crucial MX500 1000GB 2.5in SATA - Rs. 4,500/- shipped

Crucial MX300 525GB 2.5in SATA - Rs. 2,500/- shipped

I believe these are fair prices based off a very cursory search but come at me, bro! J/K, please don't come at me. Open to reasonable offers. Also open to lengthy, unhinged, yet strangely detailed rants about why this pricing is absolutely off and I must be off my rocker to expect that anybody would pay it. But please no rants on PM. Public rants only.

Thanks for reading and happy browsing/buying! :)

Edit: Added Crystal Disk Info screenshots. Note: All are via external USB to SATA/NVMe readers/enclosures.
 

Attachments

  • 20230313_192417.jpg
    20230313_192417.jpg
    236.7 KB · Views: 496
  • 20230313_192503.jpg
    20230313_192503.jpg
    254.4 KB · Views: 435
  • 20230313_192729.jpg
    20230313_192729.jpg
    254.4 KB · Views: 505
  • MX500 CDI.jpg
    MX500 CDI.jpg
    261.3 KB · Views: 450
  • MX300 CDI.jpg
    MX300 CDI.jpg
    153.6 KB · Views: 434
  • EVO CDI.jpg
    EVO CDI.jpg
    137.9 KB · Views: 445
Last edited:
Crystaldiskmark benchmarks may not be accurate through a USB enclosure either, you are limited by the speed of your USB controller and not the drive itself.
 
RadarHz said:
Crystaldiskmark benchmarks may not be accurate through a USB enclosure either, you are limited by the speed of your USB controller and not the drive itself.
Click to expand...
Yeah, that's why I was asking earlier in the thread. But I got confused in the first place anyway. Leaving the screenshots up anyway, with the disclaimer that they are via USB enclosures. Thank you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top