apextwin146 said:
Also what are your views on Maha MH-C800S.
its 20% cheaper than the
MH-801D
The only differences i can see are the 800S takes twice as long to charge than the other and does not come with a backlight. The power adapter as you can see is much smaller than that of the 801D. Otherwise everything else is the same.
Your're still going to need your BC-900 periodically for cell matching as the 800 series just charge and tell you when done, they do not tell you how much capacity a battery actually has. Now if you start with a new batch of batteries chances are they will all be of a similar capacity but as time goes the differences will become more pronounced, its recommended to pair batteries that are within +/- 5% of each other otherwise the weaker gets reverse charged and the stronger works harder, thereby spoling both. The other point is your app will work as long as the weakest cell so one bad cell amongst good will result in shorter app time.
apextwin146 said:
I am getting quite a Good deal on this one but cant seem to find proper functional information regarding this.
See
this. The 800S interface seems similar to the BC-900, place first battery in, decide whether you want a default charge or a soft charge or a recondition then place all the rest and the same program will run for the lot.
So it defaults to a 1000ma charge which is 0.5C for a 2000mah battery or 500ma on the 'soft' mode which is 0.25C. Usually all you would need is the default mode, even if the batteries are old or not good quality and heat up too much then you would use the default mode as the 'soft' or 0.25C might be too low to detect termination and the bigger risk is the charger does not stop charging and overcharges. I think the only time you want the 'soft' is for AAA.
You would need to babysit them on these different settings to see whether it terminates properly. The major problem is not terminating in time rather than higher charge rate. Higher charge rate is recommended as it gives a clearer termination signal to the charger to stop and then switch over to trickle.
apextwin146 said:
Frankly no offense but i somehow find Maha MH-c900 a bit difficult to use based on the user reviews hence i need to knw if Maha MH-C800S is easier to use. It also charges 8 in a row so thats a plus point too.What do you think?
Initially, c9000 is little harder to use compared to the bc-900 but i accepted that in exchange for more accurate reporting and safety. This always happens when engineers get more say than designers. My philosophy is form follows function. It's often you don't get pretty products with this philosophy but the products do the job and do it well.
Having said that there are a cpl of improvements that could be made
- if there was a way to log data via a serial or USB port it would be nice.
- the biggest problem with these chargers is the lack of any flash memory whatsoever, so if you're in the middle of a long cycle and have a power cut then everything is lost and it restarts from the beginning :|
So its essential you have uninterrupted power to operate them if your power is erratic. Quite a few seem to think that any APC UPS like that used for a PC will suffice, but most of these ppl are referring to an interruption of a few seconds to say 5 minutes as opposed to running the charger on the UPS for hours together which is a different issue.