Switching to Linux : Redhat or Ubuntu

meetic

Novice
I m currently using WinXP and WIN98 on my P4 1.7 ghz, 256 mb RAM, (almost 2 and a half year old system). However i m considering switching to linux alongwith WIN 98 as my secondary OS. I would be glad to get the following clarifications,

1.Is switching to linux a good decision considering my ram is not too high- i do play games at times, but am not inclined to upgrade ram or anything for that matter.
2.Is linux lighter on resources when compared to Win XP or Win 98.
3.What other probs can i be expected to face while using linux initially (apart from a bit complicated user interface).
4.I have heard that Redhat version is most widely used. Is it a freeware? Also how is it when compared to UBUNTU version of Linux (heard that UBUNTU is a bit more user friendly).
5.Moreover is any other freeware linux version more user friendly? I prefer something as close to windows as possible.
 
Linux is much easier on system resources. With your configuration it will run happily for sure.
Troublesome areas would be the drivers for all your peripherals. However you can download any of the LiveCD distributions - my favourite distribution is Gentoo Gentoo downloads and then see if all of your peripherals run fine. Based on that you can take a decision.
If you have a good net connection I would recommend Gentoo. Fast, easy to upgrade individual modules and most importantly has good documentation.
 
Fedora Core 5 is absolutely cool ! :)
My system config is pretty close to urs... AMD athlon 2 Ghz processor and 256 DDR ram
it runs absolutely smoothly. only problem is that it doesn't have mp3 player or video players(mplayer esp) with the raw package... but u can use YUM or APT for that...
FC5 comes with KDE 3.5 which is execeptionally good looking and improved compared to prev versions of the same.

Switch to it with no qualms.. u will enjoy the experience.
 
meetic said:
1.Is switching to linux a good decision considering my ram is not too high- i do play games at times, but am not inclined to upgrade ram or anything for that matter.
2.Is linux lighter on resources when compared to Win XP or Win 98.
3.What other probs can i be expected to face while using linux initially (apart from a bit complicated user interface).
Hi meetic
Linux is low on resources so dont worry. Linux is not exactly lighter than Windows but its memory architecture is bit more untangled and clean unlike MS. Well the user interface is not complicated but a clear breezer for a change....
meetic said:
4.I have heard that Redhat version is most widely used. Is it a freeware? Also how is it when compared to UBUNTU version of Linux (heard that UBUNTU is a bit more user friendly).
5.Moreover is any other freeware linux version more user friendly? I prefer something as close to windows as possible.
Redhat is not freeware but Redhat sponsered Fedora is. If you need something close to windows try Live Cd of Ubuntu, or go ahead with installing Fedora, or SUSE ( nice GUI ) or Mandrake.
AJ
 
You cannot and must not compare Linux in a direct way to the Windows
operating system. Windows as a whole, along with its GUI, is nowhere as
tweakable as any given Linux distribution. When you install Windows, there
exists no option to enable only commandline or using a different or lighter
GUI. With Linux, you can skip installing X altogether and you'll do just fine.

If you're low on system resources, I recommend you use BlackBox/FluxBox/
OpenBox or XFCe as your windows manager and DE. IMHO, 256Mb is not
quite sufficient for running GNOME and KDE in their true glory. You need
atleast 512Mb for that. XFCe is most feature rich of the four I mentioned
above, and closer to appearance and functionality of GNOME.

I advise you to try Slackware, Debian or ArchLinux on your system. All three
are infinitely tweakable and run exceptionally well on older systems like yours.
Gentoo is good only if you've a T1 connection, and a week ahead to compile
the whole system. The concept is good, but not new or practical enough.
 
if you are new to linux, go for ubuntu. fedora core is great, but you must be at least familiar with linux to extract the maximum from it. also, the installation is very big, and maybe unnecesary for typical users
 
Go for debian....it comes on 2 dvds or 14 cds and has everything you'll need to migrate from windows to linux and its easy to manage as well
 
hi Meetic.

let me add a few pointer to the excellent one youve already recieved
Is switching to linux a good decision considering my ram is not too high- i do play games at times, but am not inclined to upgrade ram or anything for that matter.
here the question is why do you want to switch to linux. it could be for learning , or it could be for not using windows at all.
If its for learning then you have no problem. go with Mandriva/mandrake, or fedora, suse or ubuntu. Of all these mandriva and suse are the most user friendly. (imo) given that this is your first foray into linux.

If its for switching to linux completely then you need to make a list of your commonly used apps and find alternatives on the linux side. many times there are no alternatives or you have to compromise on some features. at other times the apps for linux are much more full featured and even free!

Device drivers are not so tweakable as windows drivers are- this is because the windows drivers are made by the manufacturer, and linux drivers are often reverse engineered ones which the manufacturer doesn't support. for example ppl with x1000 sries cards have lot of problems.

Regarding requirements for ram etc, linux loves ram and makes full use of it. the more you have the happier linux is! but it makes do just fine with 256 mb if thats all you have.
Youll be fine with KDE or even gnome - maybe a bit slow at times! but not much. but the features these offer beat windows by a very long shot!

As regards memory etc.

Is linux lighter on resources when compared to Win XP or Win 98

no
not the current ones. this is because windows has every thing integrated like explorer, is always running- internet explorer starts very fast, word starts faster than openoffice etc. on the other hand linux is made up of different programs from different people. for exmaple the display id handled by the Xserver - a fairly huge program that is slow compared to windows builtin desktop management. then KDE and Gnome - (like explorer) are separate programs. so is mozilla firefox and so on. so things maybe slower. definetly on a low or medium end system , win 98 will be much more responsive.

.I have heard that Redhat version is most widely used. Is it a freeware? Also how is it when compared to UBUNTU version of Linux (heard that UBUNTU is a bit more user friendly).

Redhat was widely used. now ubuntu is the most used. however i would suggest you use suse. this is the mist polished distro right now. ubuntu one cd install is too minimal for people who dont have broadband. so the full range of software that is available for linux is not immedeatley enjoyable by the user.
or mandriva. stay away for now from debian , slackware or gentoo.
or try freespire. this is the most windows like!

What other probs can i be expected to face while using linux initially (apart from a bit complicated user interface).
remember one thing. you know windows very well. you used it for a long time. now linux is a different planet. things are called by different names, and you're allowed to fiddle with every thing. the language here is different c: is /dev/hda1 etc. you will have to learn all this and you'll find that this makes better sense.

now linux by its nature today, needs configuring by hand sometimes. sometimes things dont "Automagically work". this happens in windows also but the solution is often a reinstall! plus your vendor may support you.

with linux many times youre on your own with support only from the user community! which youll find is a great thing.

so anyway do try it.
ps: where are you located? if youre in bangalore i could lend you some of these linux distro cds for you to try.

regards
 
Back
Top