Telegram may get banned in India.

[Decadent_Spectre]

what exactly did you not find anything "qualified"? You literally asked for proof about Elon banning accounts and spreading misinformation, but NO its not relevant enough for you? you have lost the plot my guy.

These are literally your quotes.

PUBLIC DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE, all the guy did was slap a UI for easier parsing and called it a day. And P.S. its the same family where that motherfucker would rather deprive his new born children from their mother over a petty feud than prioritise his wellbeing, the same motherfucker who would lie on internet about holding his baby in his arms while he (the baby) was dying for some internet points, the same motherfucker who would go so far as to forcing his baby's dying grandmother begging on twitter for access to her grandson and for the mother to see her son.

he doesnt give a flying **** about his family, he just hates he cant control anything.

You do realize what kind of man you are defending? or does all of this does not matter to you?

All that matters to people these days in political debates (online and offline) is supporting their faction (whichever it is) and burning the opposition. Everything else is irrelevant. Those who follow this are fanatical. Pick a side, pick a gun and fight.

 

[blr_p]

All that matters to people these days in political debates (online and offline) is supporting their faction (whichever it is) and burning the opposition. Everything else is irrelevant. Those who follow this are fanatical. Pick a side, pick a gun and fight.

I thought my objections amounted to much more than that.

I reiterate that list doesn't stand scrutiny.

 

[Decadent_Spectre]

I thought my objections amounted to much more than that.

I reiterate that list doesn't stand scrutiny.

My post wasn't directed at you. It was a general post that applies to people who are into politics.

 

[blr_p]

My post wasn't directed at you. It was a general post that applies to people who are into politics.

Your implication is both sides arguments are legit.

They're not. Ive called out this so called proof.

Makes me think you can't do this on reddit. I didn't see a single challenge. Very curious.

So it must all be legit then. Heh

 

[Decadent_Spectre]

Your implication is both sides arguments are legit.

They're not. Ive called out this so called proof.

Makes me think you can't do this on reddit. I didn't see a single challenge. Very curious.

So it must all be legit then. Heh

No. I don't believe both sides are "legit".

I don't visit reddit and I don't discuss politics much.

Personally I don't see the point of debate, you can not convince a fanatic. If you could the amount of time and effort required would be large and for what? Your opinion is shared by one who opposed it? I think such things are a waste of time.

 

[adder]

pfft scroll up, where I sent proof where that little b**ch blocked community posts on his account

Oh boy, the irony is lost on you, aint it?

As early as last month or so one of his posts where community noted. Some times if enough people vote it as non helpful it will be removed.

Most of time Elon is reposting or replying with !!, Exactly, or other emojis. So the original post he is responding to will get community noted.

Many a times, I have gotten a community noted notification after his posts or his replies.

Is Elon perfect no. Does he have a bias yes. Does some higher powers make or forced him not be neutral on certain topics, yes to some extent. I know that he will be taken out literally, if he says anything bad on a certain miltary conflict. Even Trump or Vivek or RFK Jr had to course correct or risk being cancelled. Even the democrats are not that stupid except for the squad members with regards to a particular conflict.

But for everything else he has been pretty fair, I see accounts that talk shit about him or his companies still posting and the fact that I can read it means, they are not shadow banned. Its only when you go after his family which affects their safety or a account that posts only hateful content, threatening someone life will they get banned.

 

[guest_999]

All of Modi's speeches appeared on his twitter account so he could not be quoted out of context as was the fashion before. Social media completely removed that stunt. That to me is the main reason. Direct line to whoever you support without middle man.

You do know that Modi does not personally write/type those posts on twitter? It is perfect plausible deniability (aka the guy actually typing the post made a mistake while following instructions).

I have no idea as to your reason.

Newspapers can't print something which can get them into legal trouble as it was half baked facts/outright lies/post truth. Social media can.

 

[blr_p]

You do know that Modi does not personally write those posts? It is perfect plausible deniability (aka the guy actually typing the post made a mistake while following instructions).

People were posting parts if the speech misleading others. Same applies to any leader. Before social media acces to the fullspeech of wasn't always available.

Newspapers can't print something which can get them into legal trouble as it was half baked facts/outright lies/post truth. Social media can.

Yes this is what i was thinking of in reply to another post. See below

Its another argument by itself.

If social media is becoming so important why isn't it being regulated the same way as the MSM. I remember Trump threatening to remove FCC 230 protections. He didn't in the end maybe legally not possible.

Musk buying twitter changed the course of history for the better. We wouldn't even know half the world events without X. The trust in the media is at all time low and western media even outright lies.

X usage activity is at all time high and is the number 1 source of raw news and events without any media spin.

^ This

 

[guest_999]

People were posting parts if the speech misleading others. Same applies to any leader. Before social media acces to the fullspeech of wasn't always available.

Nobody was posting those parts in a print newspaper. Whatever was/is printed in a newspaper is rarely legally challengeable. Before social media, there was no need to read/access full speech anyway as those are meant for a live audience & the reason why nobody has ever successfully filed a PIL in supreme court for all those speeches made by politicians promising the moon but delivering nothing. It is only the written word that gets put into those govt files/notes that matters.

If social media is becoming so important why isn't it being regulated the same way as the MSM.

For same reason, social media is inherently much more manipulable so neither politicians not billionaires like Musk want controls on it because all of them want the option to control it to exist. Ever heard of Musk or politicians talking in same passionate way about controls on print media? You won't because print media has much more legal liability so neither Musk nor politicians can just get their absurd statements printed there.

Musk buying twitter changed the course of history for the better. We wouldn't even know half the world events without X.

Famous last words & a clear indicator of why this world will feel so much pain in the coming decades.

 

[invisiblebond]

Kamala is a media creation. One month ago she was nothing. Now she has suddenly become a contender. Complete media makeover. Because the media supports the Democrats. And musk is offering an alternative. Same story elsewhere. Liberal leaning is the most profitable and they have their preferences.

So social media is the only alternative right wing politicians have. Oh and that cannot be allowed to stand.

Joe Biden was the one who created the winning ticket with Kamala Harris. If Biden had announced he would not seek the 2024 candidacy, securing a winning ticket would have been difficult. By the way, have you ever listened to a podcast from a prominent news channel discussing Joe Biden during the Trump vs. Biden "disgusting"

 

[dpandey]

Kamala is a media creation. One month ago she was nothing.

Kamala is a deep state creation. Media got the call and did what they were told. She was never anything and that may be the biggest qualification these days for being a deep state PR person US president .

US is in the middle of a hostile takeover. A foreign transnational organization is slowly working on taking power away from the WASPs. Obama and Biden, like Kamala, are a part of the plan. A search for 'US supreme court justices religious affiliations' should give you a hint.