We don't know how many takedown requests each of these platforms receive and how many each of them comply with. Anyway, i think we need to make a clear distinction between things like removing child exploitation material and anti piracy requests from copyright trolls like RIAA when discussing moderation. One of them is much more serious even though lobbyists want us to believe that they are the same with high profile raids like the one on kim dotcom.
Here is an interview with one of the twitter files authors.
Here is one example from 2021
Pretty low isn't it.
All Big Tech companies publish a transparency request on the content they have taken down every quarter. Following is an example of the Meta report.
transparency.meta.com
Yeah right. Capitol Hill attack criminals are getting convicted left & right while SC of USA loaded with Trump nominees & almost half of the states with republican majority are sitting on their thumbs not able to file even a half decent & believable court case against FBI & CIA. Looks like you took "internet gossips" too seriously (silver lining, at least you didn't took pizzagate seriously). Always remember, if it can't be proved in courts of a first world nation then it wasn't worth seriously considering to begin with.
So twitter files is internet gossip for you?
Ever heard of "concrete evidence", the one they ask in courts? If twitter files were "concrete evidence" then republicans would have filed at least a dozen cases all over the US in various state courts controlled by them but till now no such thing is done meaning twitter files might be a bit more than internet gossip but much less than concrete evidence.
