low_bass_makker
Adept
kippu said:
dont know about mumbai side.....
OC & Modding Thermalright Ultra 120 Plus: Is More Better?
- Thread starter ms_mahu
- Start date
dont know about mumbai side.....
ranjan2001
Adept
low_bass_makker said:
I saw this cooler at SMC & its massive, it weighs over 800 gms & with 2 fans optional it will be 1.1 kg.
Do u recommend that thsi can work normally without bending & putting additional load on the mobo.
^Review at AT for the same:
AnandTech: Cooler Master Gemini II: Performer or Poser?
AnandTech: Cooler Master Gemini II: Performer or Poser?
ranjan2001
Adept
I am confused too as I dont find any user experience & its size stops me & make me think.
I have no problem with size but its the weight.
I have no problem with size but its the weight.
low_bass_makker
Adept
Chaos said:LOL looks like the gemini sux bigtime. I'm not surprised, almost all good designs these days are towers.
hmmm.....say the anandtech review today itself....these websites gives some different result....here at x-bitlabs they are say gemini as a very good cooler....
X-bit labs - Big Typhoon Squared: Cooler Master GeminII Review (page 7)
http://rpbu.coolermaster.com/UserFiles/Image/Reviews/200704_Atomic_Hardcore.jpg
Technic3D Artikel: Coolermaster Gemin II mit A.C. Ryan Blackfire 4 – Der Kühlriese in blauem Licht ! - Seite 5
Cooler Master GeminII CPU Cooler Review - Testing & Our Recommendation
They should be comparing the Ultra-X at 2800 rpm to the gemini. 1350rpm fan is lame... its hardly any air. As you can see in the other graph, there's a 5 degree drop between 1350rpm and 2500 rpm. Also its pretty obvious from the temperatures in case and outside that their case is really cramped with no airflow whatsoever. See how much the scythe infinity improves between open stand and inside case. So its the case more than anything thats limiting cooling performance.
Edit: Just realized that they are using TAT on an E6400@3.55GHz, 1.475V. This is roughly the same as what my CPU. What is scary is that I never breached 63-64 on load on an ultra-120 in TAT on an E6600 @3.6, 1.475, however long it was running. But these coolers seem to be throttling at the same clocks... something is obviously screwed up in their testing... there's no way temps should go that high. Something is screwed up in the test results.
Edit: Just realized that they are using TAT on an E6400@3.55GHz, 1.475V. This is roughly the same as what my CPU. What is scary is that I never breached 63-64 on load on an ultra-120 in TAT on an E6600 @3.6, 1.475, however long it was running. But these coolers seem to be throttling at the same clocks... something is obviously screwed up in their testing... there's no way temps should go that high. Something is screwed up in the test results.
ranjan2001
Adept
Just read this at xbit review.
Is that true? I remember reading about it mounted with a back plate, isn't that included in the case?
Is that true? I remember reading about it mounted with a back plate, isn't that included in the case?
low_bass_makker
Adept
Chaos said:
sir we uses cooler inside the case not outside...........
ranjan2001
Adept
@low_bass_makker
since u use the gemini 2
do u get base plate for 775 intel too or not & does the mobo get bent with the weight or is it not the problem.
since u use the gemini 2
do u get base plate for 775 intel too or not & does the mobo get bent with the weight or is it not the problem.
low_bass_makker
Adept
ranjan2001 said:
no there was no plate for the intel.....but there was for the amd.....but if you plan not to move your system a lot then there is no problem........
stormblast
Skilled
low_bass_makker said:
omg u dont get a plate for intel? i was gonna pick up this heatsink for a c2d. good i dint or would have got owned.
ranjan2001
Adept
Is it so that the mounting amd needs this & the intel may not.
I wonder why would they not include this if its intel775 compatible.
I wonder why would they not include this if its intel775 compatible.
