WCG 2010 Bangalore Round...

Hi guys... Nice to see some gaming action in recent weeks in Bangalore.. 14-15th august to be precise. :bleh:

Here is the link to register.

WCG 2010 | India

There are not a lot of games. Just Fifa and CS.. Although there is cricket but who cares for a flash game:S

I would have participated in the CS but it need 5 players. I need 3 or 4 more players to create a team. Are there any guys up for this tournament?
Cheers...

PM me
 
I know, but indian organizer always stay 3 or 4 years behind the world. Even for sports game they are using a flash cricket game, why couldn't they use Ashes Cricket 2009 or International Cricket 2010
 
brickhouse said:
its sad that people still play CS,i jst hate that game

they should start console gaming in WCG
Haha lol, CS and StarCraft will always be in WCG. And stop whinning, console games are present in WCG, its the Indian organizers who do not keep it in the Indian format.
 
jc36lect3r said:
Haha lol, CS and StarCraft will always be in WCG. And stop whinning, console games are present in WCG, its the Indian organizers who do not keep it in the Indian format.
console games are very few in WCG worldwide

and i don't have anything against starcraft,its just CS which i hate

and yeah its so bad that the indian organiser only keep so less games,they just cater to few games

as indian gamers just don't play anything(i'm talking about the majority so don't bash me for this),they just go to a cafe and start playing CS.

about WCG worldwide,they will never introduce console games as WCG isn't that big so not many console gamers know about it and as it is most console gamers just aren't interested
 
brickhouse said:
casual gamers console gamers.......................lmao
It is true though... in most cases. When it comes to consoles, there are few genres that cater to competitive gaming... you have fighting games, racing games and some sports games. First person shooters and RTS games (which commonly make up the most "hardcore" games) are terrible on consoles.
 
ashr said:
It is true though... in most cases. When it comes to consoles, there are few genres that cater to competitive gaming... you have fighting games, racing games and some sports games. First person shooters and RTS games (which commonly make up the most "hardcore" games) are terrible on consoles.
competitive gaming is different thing

it doesn't mean console gamers are casual gamers if they don't compete,console gamers are most hardcore.

just because you compete doesn't mean you are a hardcore gamer

hardcore gamers regularly play and follow gamers,there is nothing else to being hardcore

you are very wrong if you thing hardcore means competing,

you are also wrong if you think FPS's aren't good on console,they have come very far now.yeah PC and the mouse are big but FPS is a big genre on console.

for gods sakes MW2 sold 19million on PS3,360 and just around 1.5million on PC.

RTS is the only major genre that isn't big on console and that is gonna change with the motion controls

most of the indian gamers who just keep on playing CS and Warcaraft don't even know what other franchises there are,those fool just go sit in a gaming cafe play CS cause its COOL and think they are pro's
 
Desecrator said:
@hitman02in: Dude, what's with that signature? :O

*faints*
heh my BF:BC2 stats :p or do you mean something else ?

@ brickhouse - dude wcg means competitive.we are talking competitive / casual here - i dont know what you mean by hardcore or what category that comes in.
 
brickhouse said:
competitive gaming is different thing

most of the indian gamers who just keep on playing CS and Warcaraft don't even know what other franchises there are,those fool just go sit in a gaming cafe play CS cause its COOL and think they are pro's

Dude, I don't know what your gripe against CS is, but you really should chill down....

I was a competitive CS player a long time back, and I can tell you why CS is the world's most played multiplayer shooter:

1. Easy to learn - You have 5 guys, other team has 5 guys, kill them before they plant the bomb or defuse it.

2. Easy on the systems, you don't need a monster rig to run it

3. Offers challenging team play, strategies and tactics if you feel like it. CS matches can require great strategies, tactics and adaptability in high level matches

4. Weak copy protection, multiplayer does not require original version. This is HUGE plus, especially in India.

5. Good variety of maps and weapons.

But seeing your hate, this is all redundant information for you. Let me guess, you got horribly knifed once?

And yes, it IS cool to pull off a desert eagle headie from A long, or awp that sucker when he is jumping down in banana....
 
jc36lect3r said:
Dude, I don't know what your gripe against CS is, but you really should chill down....

when have i heated up that i need to chill down,was just replying

I was a competitive CS player a long time back, and I can tell you why CS is the world's most played multiplayer shooter

no source of it

1. Easy to learn - You have 5 guys, other team has 5 guys, kill them before they plant the bomb or defuse it.

2. Easy on the systems, you don't need a monster rig to run it

3. Offers challenging team play, strategies and tactics if you feel like it. CS matches can require great strategies, tactics and adaptability in high level matches

4. Weak copy protection, multiplayer does not require original version. This is HUGE plus, especially in India.

5. Good variety of maps and weapons.

yeah but that doesn't make it the best and what its status is in countries like india

But seeing your hate, this is all redundant information for you. Let me guess, you got horribly knifed once?

i got what???

i just never found the game that interesting as i don't like mindless shooting games

i hate it because it is no super-game or it didn't bring anything big to gaming.that as it didn't bring much,it shouldn't be praised as the ultimate game which it is in India.

Its the COOL game that everybody wants to play,mostly gamers who don't know much about gaming just hop on it it and go to gaming cafe and spend their most of the free time.now i am not saying that hardcore gamers don't play it but majority aren't hardcore gamers

[/QUOTEAnd yes, it IS cool to pull off a desert eagle headie from A long, or awp that sucker when he is jumping down in banana....[/QUOTE]
its a different thing to pull something of whithin a game and the other thing which i was refrering which is majority of the gamers playing CS wouldn't play it if it wasn't COOL.
 
i hate it because it is no super-game or it didn't bring anything big to gaming.

you think cs didn't bring anything to gaming ?

you are terribly misinformed then.it brought competitive gaming to the fore like no game before it.
 
brickhouse said:
competitive gaming is different thing

it doesn't mean console gamers are casual gamers if they don't compete,console gamers are most hardcore.

just because you compete doesn't mean you are a hardcore gamer

hardcore gamers regularly play and follow gamers,there is nothing else to being hardcore

you are very wrong if you thing hardcore means competing,

you are also wrong if you think FPS's aren't good on console,they have come very far now.yeah PC and the mouse are big but FPS is a big genre on console.

for gods sakes MW2 sold 19million on PS3,360 and just around 1.5million on PC.

RTS is the only major genre that isn't big on console and that is gonna change with the motion controls

most of the indian gamers who just keep on playing CS and Warcaraft don't even know what other franchises there are,those fool just go sit in a gaming cafe play CS cause its COOL and think they are pro's
Note that I said in most cases. I started my gaming "career" with consoles at the age of 3 and played them until I was introduced to PC multiplayer gaming when I was 15. You could say I was a hardcore console gamer as I played a lot of games and always tried to get better at them. However, they sure didn't match up to the challenge that came up when playing against other human players.

PC gaming, with the early advent of multiplayer has long been the de facto standard for "hardcore" gaming. By hardcore I don't mean time you put into playing games but how good you can possibly get at a game or two before you reach a saturation point that offers little to no rewards. This happens a lot with Console gaming since most of it was single player content against AI that followed the same patterns every time. Sure multiplayer has improved a lot but it hasn't reached the level of PC gaming just yet. Consoles are also marketed towards the average joe and not the hardcore gamer. For example, PC gamers are commonly written off as nerds while owning a console makes you look like a cool kid.

Again this is a generalization going by the state of the video game industry today. Sure there are many games on consoles that are as difficult or challenging as a PC game but they are a minority. Most console buyers (I wouldn't call them gamers) prefer chilling out with their friends and playing Guitar Hero over a beer or two. Due to this, the kind of titles that are pushed towards the platforms are often dumbed down to meet the requirements of the consumer base. There are plenty of console players who could kick my ass in a few games, I'm not denying that at all... but it simply isn't true when you look at numbers.

As for FPS games, they might sell a lot on consoles but most of them are dumbed down to make them easier to play on controllers (AND TO CATER TO THE TARGET CONSUMERS WHO ARE AVERAGE JOES, NOT HARDCORE GAMERS) as opposed to the games you play using a mouse and keyboard on PC. MW2 may have sold a lot more on consoles but including the console version in a tournament that looks to test skill over the PC version would simply be a poor choice. Mouse and keyboard allow for so much more when it comes to FPS as the entire genre was designed around that input device combination. It's the same thing with RTS where clicking with a mouse and pressing multiple keys plays a HUGE role in the basic design of the game and motion controls isn't going to change this.

Now, most games that have competitive scenes following them are played on PC so it's no wonder WCG and other tournaments host them and not as many console games.
 
hitman02in said:
you think cs didn't bring anything to gaming ?

you are terribly misinformed then.it brought competitive gaming to the fore like no game before it.
i said it didn't bring anything big

competitive gaming is not what CS brought its what gamers started doing,any game would be competitive if its good.

--- Updated Post - Automerged ---

ashr said:
Note that I said in most cases. I started my gaming "career" with consoles at the age of 3 and played them until I was introduced to PC multiplayer gaming when I was 15. You could say I was a hardcore console gamer as I played a lot of games and always tried to get better at them. However, they sure didn't match up to the challenge that came up when playing against other human players.

i never said anything about multiplayer or single payer comparison,i'm talking about what CS having a big name when other games are much bigger

PC gaming, with the early advent of multiplayer has long been the de facto standard for "hardcore" gaming.By hardcore I don't mean time you put into playing games but how good you can possibly get at a game or two before you reach a saturation point that offers little to no rewards.

then you are wrong and you should use the word hardcore cause it doesn't mean how much good you are at a game

you can't jst say and word and then say i mean this by saying it

hardcore gaming is simply defined as playing games regularly and following gaming

a person knowing nothing about games genrally and going to a gaming cafe and playing CS 24/7 is not a hardcore gamer

This happens a lot with Console gaming since most of it was single player content against AI that followed the same patterns every time. Sure multiplayer has improved a lot but it hasn't reached the level of PC gaming just yet.

why are you even comparing single player thing?

multiplayer is very much big on consoles,you are very mistaken if you think not

Consoles are also marketed towards the average joe and not the hardcore gamer.

sorry i have to say this but you are just repeating the same thing again and again and you are a big fool

PC gaming and becoming the best doesn't have anything to do with being 'hardcore' gaming

you are tyalking like one of those cheapo players who just plays CS all the time in the cafe,knows nothing about games and thinks he is a professional

and console gaming is no average joe thing,most PC gamers just pirate games and console games are way more costly so average joe thing doesn't even mean anything here

For example, PC gamers are commonly written off as nerds while owning a console makes you look like a cool kid.

all gamers are known as geeks not nerds.

and no there is not much difference about being cool and geeky about PC and consoles

and playing CS more known as COOL

Again this is a generalization going by the state of the video game industry today. Sure there are many games on consoles that are as difficult or challenging as a PC game but they are a minority.

you need to look at the industry then say those things

Most console buyers (I wouldn't call them gamers) prefer chilling out with their friends and playing Guitar Hero over a beer or two.

now you really don't knmow anything about gaming.............CONFIRMED

guitar hero has been dead for some time now,its sales are so low

and the COOL thing you are talking about is with every industry as whatever things becomes popular,the amercians,indians just blindly follow it and but labeling consoles as it is wrong

Due to this, the kind of titles that are pushed towards the platforms are often dumbed down to meet the requirements of the consumer base.

no they are not.

its cause of publisher trying to get the game out in time thing.

There are plenty of console players who could kick my ass in a few games, I'm not denying that at all... but it simply isn't true when you look at numbers.

why do you think its about you and how good you are in gaming,nobody is even talking about you here

As for FPS games, they might sell a lot on consoles but most of them are dumbed down to make them easier to play on controllers

lmao

they aren't dumed down because of controllers

(AND TO CATER TO THE TARGET CONSUMERS WHO ARE AVERAGE JOES, NOT HARDCORE GAMERS) as opposed to the games you play using a mouse and keyboard on PC.

so playing games on mouse and keyboard make it hardcore and hardcore and makes console gamers average joe.............................lol

MW2 may have sold a lot more on consoles but including the console version in a tournament that looks to test skill over the PC version would simply be a poor choice.

no it wouldn't as people like to play on contollers

Mouse and keyboard allow for so much more when it comes to FPS as the entire genre was designed around that input device combination.

so jst because the genre was designed on PC with Wolf it can't go anywhere else?

i'm not saying that mouse and keyboard aren't good for playing FPS,but there is no harm in adding it

It's the same thing with RTS where clicking with a mouse and pressing multiple keys plays a HUGE role in the basic design of the game and motion controls isn't going to change this.

so??????

Now, most games that have competitive scenes following them are played on PC so it's no wonder WCG and other tournaments host them and not as many console games.

its also because there aren't many console gamers in india as people just don't buy expensive things

and even worldwide console gamers play on PSN and XBL than competing in competitions
 
brickhouse said:
competitive gaming is not what CS brought its what gamers started doing,any game would be competitive if its good.
So in short, CS was that 'good' game that brought competitive gaming to the forefront because people started playing it competitively because it was 'good' ;).
As much as I dislike CS, you are just spinning words around to make something that is true seem not to be so and CS did infact make competitive gaming big. Before CS, there were only a handful developer organized Quake tourneys in place of the professional scene we have today.

On another note, I think simracing should be given a spot in competitive gaming tourneys, it'd appeal to both the e-sports as well as the conventional sports crowd. But most simracers are in their mid 40s and doubt they'd even want to bother with tourneys aimed at a much younger demographic.
Otherwise it'd be an awesome crowd puller since an average league race plays out exactly like a real life racing event, only with more door-to-door battles.
 
Back
Top