http://techreport.com/reviews/2005q2/radeon-x800xl-512mb/index.x?pg=7 Wins one and loses one
http://techreport.com/reviews/2005q2/radeon-x800xl-512mb/index.x?pg=8 The difference is negligible..
Nikhil posted 1.82 minutes later:
@ Chaos --- please do not reply right now......... I posted by mistake..... Wait for some time.......
@ Undertaker ---- As far as I know, Chaos is not a FanATic......
And there is no harm in having a healthy debate..... if I am wrong, I will accept it..... I think I am right though...... let me see.....
Nikhil posted 17.33 minutes later:
http://techreport.com/reviews/2005q2/radeon-x800xl-512mb/index.x?pg=9
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2299&p=6 --- I am neglecting both HL2 and DOOM 3.
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2299&p=7
http://www.techreport.com/reviews/2004q4/radeon-x800xl/index.x?pg=9
http://www.hothardware.com/printarticle.cfm?articleid=649 ----- You See???? This can go on and on and on...... every website gets slightly different results.... and this battle between X800 XL and 6800GT is so close that even those minute difference make sure that the winners and losers change places frequently...
Anandtech said:
Once it was launched, we knew that the X800 XL would be an interesting competitor to NVIDIA's GeForce 6800GT, and indeed it is. As we mentioned earlier in the review, ignoring Doom 3, the X800 XL is quite competitive with the 6800GT and should be $100 cheaper when it hits the streets. At a high level, the X800 XL is a more affordable alternative to the 6800GT that offers similar performance in most areas. Unfortunately for ATI, Doom 3 is a big deal and it somewhat complicates our recommendation.
If you are looking for an AGP card, your only option at this price point is really the 6800GT. There are cheaper alternatives, but not better performing AGP alternatives at $400 or less.
ATI informed us at the X850 launch that the X800 XL would be available sometime in January. If this is indeed true, then in January, we'd be foolish not to recommend the X800 XL, not because it offers a huge performance advantage over the 6800GT (which it does not), but because it holds a $100 price advantage over the 6800GT.
If ATI is able to bring out the X800 XL at its suggested street price of $299, then most users won't have a problem glancing over the lower Doom 3 performance, given that the X800 XL is quite competitive in other titles. If ATI can ensure that their only blemish is Doom 3, and should they continue to work hard to reduce that blemish through further driver optimizations, then the X800 XL won't only be the more affordable solution, but it would become the clear solution.
For now, ATI wins because of price, which is something that we're able to live with. Now, if this thing is actually available when it's suppose to be, then we'll be happy. However, if it's not, then ATI will have succeeded in delaying holiday sales of NVIDIA's GeForce 6800GT. If you are at all worried about ATI bringing out the X800 XL on time, then the 6800GT is still a good option, just a potentially more costly one. We can't predict the future, but for the sake of keeping competition cleaner, we're hoping that come January, we won't regret recommending the X800 XL today.
So, what this means is that while performance in DOOM 3 suffers quite a bit(seems to have been corrected to a certain extent with Cats 5.6), they both are very evenly matched.....
So, zhopudey cannot really go wrong with either....
But zhopudey ---- I suggest you go for a Sapphire or Gigabyte, Asus, MSI, or some good brand. Not Powercolor....
In the end, I think, it is just a matter of availability and price and brand loyalty for zhopudey's friend in the US
EDIT: Thanks for waiting till I completed my post.......
Nikhil posted 0.98 minutes later:
And also --- the other advantages of a 6800GT are there ----- better overclockability, SLI support, and easy availability.....
Nikhil posted 2.15 minutes later:
techreport said:
http://www.techreport.com/reviews/2004q4/radeon-x800xl/index.x?pg=10
In 3DMark, the performance of the Radeon X800 XL is remarkably similar to that of the GeForce 6800 GT, both in terms of the overall score and performance in the individual game tests.
This is so true not only of artificial benchies but all the real world tests also..... I guess, we have to call this battle a tie..... maybe a win for ATI because of the pricing..... but also note that for that sort of low pricing, you will not get any nice bundle with the graphics card......
Nikhil posted 5.97 minutes later:
techreport said:
The Radeon X800 XL is a new product, but it's based on familiar technology. As such, it's a price cut and a performance boost all in one. The Radeon X800 XL is faster than the X800 Pro that it essentially replaces, yet at $299, it lists for $100 less. What's not to like?
As a reviewer, I'm sure I'm supposed to complain about something, but I'm kind of at a loss here. The Radeon X800 XL offers performance that rivals NVIDIA's fastest single card, the GeForce 6800 Ultra, for $200 less. Not only that, but the XL has a quiet, single-slot cooler and doesn't require an auxiliary power connection. This card should nestle neatly into a small form factor system without overheating the box or overtaxing the power supply. I suppose I'd like to see an AGP version of this card, but that's not a complaint so much as it is asking for more.
With the Radeon X800 XL, ATI has redefined the upper-middle class of the graphics market, and NVIDIA will have to respond by slashing the price of the GeForce 6800 GT or making an equivalent move. In fact, now that the XL has arrived, I fail to see the point of spending more than $299 for single-card solutions that offer incremental performance gains over the XL. Unless you really, really need dual DVI outputs and video capture capabilities in the same card, there's no reason to buy a Radeon X850 XT.
ATI says the Radeon X800 XL should be shipping in the next couple of weeks. Let's hope they can keep the supply of these cards flowing freely. So long as the Radeon X800 XL doesn't suffer from too many of the availability problems that previous X800 cards have, ATI has a winner on its hands.
about overclocking an X800 XL
Unfortunately, I didn't get too far with the XL's clock speeds, which topped out at 428MHz for the core and 522MHz for the memory.
From a stock of 400/490.
The GT runs at 350/1000. It can be easily overclocked to 400/1100 which is Ultra speed...
Nikhil posted 6.03 minutes later:
I think that the lack of an external power connector(which people say is good) detracts from overclocking further......
SO, for every good thing, there is a bad ..... :sigh: