The reasons which we are giving here sound more personal than actual technical. To each his own. Just buy whichever you think would make you more comfortable and be happy.Your answers made me more confused guys. I have a Mi3 in Flipkart cart which needs to be purchased by midnight today. Otherwise It will lapse. I have used Moto G, frankly its looks are quiet ordinary and the display is good but not great.
Your answers made me more confused guys. I have a Mi3 in Flipkart cart which needs to be purchased by midnight today. Otherwise It will lapse. I have used Moto G, frankly its looks are quiet ordinary and the display is good but not great.
And oh the lack of a dual sim on Mi3 is a con for me because you cannot trust a single operator nowadays. I have an Airtel, Aircel and a Vodafone SIM.
The reasons which we are giving here sounds more personal than actual technical. To each his own. Just buy whichever you think would make you more comfortable and be happy.
Not interested. I have eyes only on the Moto G for now. *_*redmi 1S is dual SIM which will launch in India any-day now.
Same as you said. But the inclusion of tablet pc is an interesting one. Was listening to a podcast and one of the speakers was speculating that 2015 will be the year of the pc. Or rather hybrids like tablet pc. Will cost as much as a tablet and allow productivity as well as consumption. We will have to see how windows 9 will do with the intel broadwell. Basically tablets on mobile OS are going to take a hit.What do you guys use your cellphone for,once the excitement has worn off. Not the initial days, but after one month..? And how many of you own a tablet pc?
Was never a fan of smaller screen tabs, all they are good for is games. A bigger tab however means everything looks better and can be watched from further away. And laptop screens have always been big so does one need a big tab and a laptop or whether one could suffice.If you have a 5 inch phone and an 8 inch tablet, which one would you prefer to use if the app itself is similar.?
So it also depends on what use the phone is going to be put through and by whom. My brother uses the original samsung galaxy tab and is for some very obscure reason very satisfied with it. I personally find even my own nexus 7 (2012) to be unbearably slow.
If you get this far uneventfully then you got the right device.Whenever i get a new phone the first 15 days are the best, when you unbox it, discover the flaws, scour the net and find solutions, try all the accessories and find one which fits in comfortably, update to the latest FW, or head oveto the XDA forum. Once this ritual is done and dusted with, i am back to my old routine of using the phone,the way most people do.
mi 3 has a sony sensor, the samsung flagships upto the s4 also had sony sensors, No idea what samsung uses on its mid to lower end cameras. When you say samsung good i suppose you mean the ability to take a acceptable photo in auto. So once the hardware is close then the rest is software and image procesing algorithms are better on the higher end models.Moto G has a terrible camera, but it does have a flashlight. More importantly it has that extra sim slot. Mi3 has a better camera then G, but it is not samsung good and the focussing is something like what xperias do.(kindaa slow). The camera might become better with newer FW.
Are you asking why buy a flagship instead of mi-3 or similar ?The specs of MI3 roughly match galaxy s4 while the design is better and the price is roughly half of what someone paid for the s4 in its heyday. But maybe then were paying for the newness factor.
Why buy an assault rifle when silverballers would suffice.?
At that cost, obviously moto gHi Guys,
I am following this thread closely. Let me know which one is better buy:
1. MI3 -- at 14000
2. Moto G --16gb --- at 10200 after applying Student discount and SBI offer till 15th august
Which is better buy? or shall i wait for redmi 1s to sale at 7k?
Thanks.
I also read reviews saying the same thing about the mi3's camera. And if the images in their reviews are to be believed then they lack detail. I will go as far as to say that the quality is no better than the camera which was there on my old Chinese mp4 player. And that my old N79 with 5MP cam gave much better pictures.mi 3 has a sony sensor, the samsung flagships upto the s4 also had sony sensors, No idea what samsung uses on its mid to lower end cameras. When you say samsung good i suppose you mean the ability to take a acceptable photo in auto. So once the hardware is close then the rest is software and image procesing algorithms are better on the higher end models.
I read people complain about mi's camera but have yet to see anyone demonstrate that the problem cannot be solved. Samsungs are no good in low light compared to rivals. In good light they are very competitive.
Can you back up that claim ?I also read reviews saying the same thing about the mi3's camera. And if the images in their reviews are to be believed then they lack detail. I will go as far as to say that the quality is no better than the camera which was there on my old Chinese mp4 player. And that my old N79 with 5MP cam gave much better pictures.
Why do you say the underlined bit ?But I'm a bit surprised with people who thought that the Mi3 would give good pictures. We expect way too much from a phone which costs only 14k but comes with power specs (on paper BTW). Its a phone not a camera. Personally I'm not surprised and not disappointed with the camera quality because i didn't think it would be good and won't be surprised if the phone develops problems after a few months of usage.
Am not clear what the problem with the cam even is, not good pictures is very vague. How good is the person taking the pictures to begin with. Don't have to be a photographer but knowing the basics helps. This is assuming the camera does not have any hardware defects to begin with. Should not but it can happen.Also I'm no photographer but I don't think that software/firmware upgrade would help the cam, unless you use Photoshop Doesn't the quality mainly depend on the hardware part? If it use el-cheapo materials nothing can be done about it. We don't even know the type of lens the cam used. N79 (and many other N-series) had a Carl Zeiss lens with Xenon flash. Just saying.
Oh oh , no i meant my post is OT. Did not refer to your post as OT.Dude the N79 post was just for comparison so not really OT.
Yeah when Quality mattered more than Quantity.P.S. in the older days of this forum, or maybe it was TA Then,i posted a camera comparison between nokia 6230 and SE k700i. Those were the days....