Proxmox Thread - Home Lab / Virtualization

Has anyone tried Proxmox setup on Dell Wyse 5070 machines ? Wanted to know if these machines will be able to run few Proxmox lxc and VMs
 
Yes they can run it but that doesn’t mean you should. Good for trying and understanding stuff. You can check this video as well:
Why should he not run it? I've ran a perfectly fine proxmox setup on an ancient cpu which used am3+ socket and it worked perfectly fine except for the fact it was terrible at video decoding. The video talks about multiple cluster I doubt @inc0d3r is looking to do something as advanced he just needs to run a few lxcs and VMs i don't think that'll be an issue. If maybe @inc0d3r can provide info on the specs of the machine and what he intends to run maybe a more educated comment can be made
 
Has anyone tried Proxmox setup on Dell Wyse 5070 machines ? Wanted to know if these machines will be able to run few Proxmox lxc and VMs

I have a couple of them in a two-node cluster, they work reliably well for low-compute like dns, ad blocking, mqtt, node-red, grafana, ftp, http file server. Probably the most reliable systems I have running right now, current uptime is 57 days (since the last extended power outage).

Anything that requires any kind of cpu will crawl though, like updating esphome devices (the compile takes several minutes).

A few years ago, I ran lite versions of Windows 10 on them, I think I had 8 on a single system under proxmox and they were reasonably responsive.
 
Anything that requires any kind of cpu will crawl though, like updating esphome devices (the compile takes several minutes).
What would be better Wyse 5070 (Celeron J150) vs M710Q (Core i3 6100T) vs Optiplex 3020 (Core i5 4590T) if the price difference between these are marginal
 
What would be better Wyse 5070 (Celeron J150) vs M710Q (Core i3 6100T) vs Optiplex 3020 (Core i5 4590T) if the price difference between these are marginal
J4105 is the most efficient (10W vs 35W for the others), 6100T around ~20-30% faster and 4590T would be ~40-50% faster.
But you have to remember that the J4105 is newer, is most efficient, and the 4590T systems would be a decade old at this point.
If the prices were very similar, I would personally get 6100T system because of better storage options and upgrades possible to something like 7500T or even 7700T later on.
 
Why should he not run it? I've ran a perfectly fine proxmox setup on an ancient cpu which used am3+ socket and it worked perfectly fine except for the fact it was terrible at video decoding. The video talks about multiple cluster I doubt @inc0d3r is looking to do something as advanced he just needs to run a few lxcs and VMs i don't think that'll be an issue. If maybe @inc0d3r can provide info on the specs of the machine and what he intends to run maybe a more educated comment can be made
Like I said, you can. If you’re just running light weight services go ahead. But even RPi5 is better than this. And more energy efficient and compact. The video answers your question in deep.
Specs are Celeron J4150 8GB RAM. Will be running pihole, wireguard, nextcloud, immich in LXC containers.
Would suggest to get better machine and gibe yourself a headroom.
I have a couple of them in a two-node cluster, they work reliably well for low-compute like dns, ad blocking, mqtt, node-red, grafana, ftp, http file server. Probably the most reliable systems I have running right now, current uptime is 57 days (since the last extended power outage).

Anything that requires any kind of cpu will crawl though, like updating esphome devices (the compile takes several minutes).

A few years ago, I ran lite versions of Windows 10 on them, I think I had 8 on a single system under proxmox and they were reasonably responsive.
How many concurrent users have you tested?