Assassin's Creed: Revelations - Discussion Thread

I already told aman last night to watch it.
<
 
Its everyones opinion just because you two liked the ending that dosent mean everyone on TE will. And even if he did not what is their to make an issue out of it? He didn't he didn't that's done. Why is there a discussion altogether on someone's opinion? Even I found the game's ending weird. Hell I found BH and II ending better.
 
^ Good for you! If you found ac2's and brotherhoods ending better. I didn't even look at your previous posts if you did anything related to the ending of acr and i didn't even opposed to any of your posts or of aman's, my ques was just for aman asking whats wrong with the ending he found? maybe he got confused somewhere or anything and if he did then either i or any other member may tell him(normal weird ending of the ac series)

Where did this "make an issue out of it" came from? It was a simple question.
 
IMO, This game was much more satisfying, as opposed to Brotherhood. Right from the very beginning, Ubisoft made a fine attempt to re-cap all the events from the previous games and present it in a simplistic form. All the gaps were filled over the course of the main game itself. The end wasn't confusing in the least bit, as the others. In fact, Ubisoft pieced every aspect of the Altair and Ezio's memories together and combined them to fill in a huge void left by the endings of the previous games. There may still be questions that are left un-answered, but that's the whole point of having a mystery to continue this franchise. This was the only game, which made an honest attempt to focus on both; Altair and Ezio. I was expecting to have the sequel to be centralized on Desmond, but I don't think that's happening either. Anyway, I'm content with this game's ending as well.
 
Ethan_Hunt said:
IMO, This game was much more satisfying, as opposed to Brotherhood. Right from the very beginning, Ubisoft made a fine attempt to re-cap all the events from the previous games and present it in a simplistic form. All the gaps were filled over the course of the main game itself. The end wasn't confusing in the least bit, as the others. In fact, Ubisoft pieced every aspect of the Altair and Ezio's memories together and combined them to fill in a huge void left by the endings of the previous games. There may still be questions that are left un-answered, but that's the whole point of having a mystery to continue this franchise. This was the only game, which made an honest attempt to focus on both; Altair and Ezio. I was expecting to have the sequel to be centralized on Desmond, but I don't think that's happening either. Anyway, I'm content with this game's ending as well.
Click to expand...

I wasn't confused by the ending, just wasn't fond of the ending a lot. Still, brotherhood was great.
 
I felt Brotherhood was a jaded extension of AC II, which wasn't really needed. The only thing memorable about it was Cristina's memories. Heck, they could have fused some of it's content in Revelations and make it one huge game. I just can't associate with it, like I do with AC2 and Revelations.
 
Actually i found all the AC2 era equal but still for me it was AC2>Revelations>Brotherhood>AC1>Bloodlines. Although i was more anticipated for Brotherhood than Revelations. Ac1 and Ac2 i played back to back.
 
rajveersingh09 said:
Dont advise me what to write and what not to. You wrote what you had to i wrote what i thought.
Click to expand...

Then stop giving your troll advices to others too.My post was entirely my view and was not pointing to anybody unlike yours.I know what i had posted.

Moderators kindly delete this useless post of mine too after some hrs.Its a request.

I only apologize to respond to an useless post which was deleted.
 
Then stop giving your troll advices to others too.My post was entirely my view and was not pointing to anybody unlike yours.I know what i had posted.

Moderators kindly delete this useless post of mine too after some hrs.Its a request.

I only apologize to respond to an useless post which was deleted.
Click to expand...

That's indecent dude. Why post this?

Saying "f*ck" makes you the bigger person?

75c265ba-94f4-11fc.jpg


Sent from my MB525 using Tapatalk
 
Nuff Guys Chill. Why argue on a useless matter. What said was said. I'm tired of getting every other day a notification that "a moderator has deleted your post" and so must be you. So please.

Although Moderator can delete this post as it does not count towards the game thread
 
Ethan_Hunt said:
I felt Brotherhood was a jaded extension of AC II, which wasn't really needed. The only thing memorable about it was Cristina's memories. Heck, they could have fused some of it's content in Revelations and make it one huge game. I just can't associate with it, like I do with AC2 and Revelations.
Click to expand...

AC is a yearly series now, so don't think they could release AC III in november last year if there was no revelations...

Sent from my MB525 using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top