chetansha said:
There is no progress in the case. and i have left it too as explained earlier.
I must have missed it but thx for stating it.
chetansha said:
the proccy i got from him conked out, I got the rma done and warranty was as per the invoice dated in Jan, and not as per the 3-4 mnths 'old proccy' as claimed by ^%&^%*&$^%#@%$ bhullar boys/. Only the tx 3 remains. which i am selling off too.
This bit you explained but i wanted to clarify whether you had just changed your mind or not.
chetansha said:
i guess the 1k loss i took in this i ll treat as given to a shameless beggar called &*%O%(*&*& boys
Yeah, this is the important bit and I wonder if in some ways whether it has implications for online trading and its future in this country.
See, so long as the trader is honest and has a reputation to maintain you can expect good service. If they are willing to accept a return on the simple basis that you are not satisfied and do a full refund.
Nothing to do with whether the product itself is faulty or not just that you're not happy. The claims of in a shop they usually do not do this and only give store credit does not apply. Because you cannot see the product and feel it in your hands to begin with. So in the online case a vendor has to go further.
Because it would appear that the legal avenues are not reliable enough to deter fraudulent behaviour
I'm not asking for laws to be toughened or even know whether that's relevant, i was just hoping we would arrive at a point, one day where buying something online would be as simple as anything else.
Caveat emptor is the often quoted mantra here, but did not feel it applied in your case.