Marcus Fenix
Innovator
Never argue with fools...
They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
1. Shaheen Bagh is not organised by any political party. Our current political parties are not capable of organising such sustained non-violent protests. When anti-corruption movement happened in Delhi, nobody came up and claimed that it was supported by BJP.
2. I don't think that the govt is in position to increase the taxes given the slump in consumption. They can't reduce it either due to deficit.
3. Shaheen Bagh will definitely affect AAP in polls but they are nowhere close to losing this election. If Lok Sabha and Delhi elections are held together, the same people would vote for Modi in Lok Sabha and Kejriwal in Delhi, that is the current mood.
Over a month now. Why couldn't they just do it at jantar mantar ?You guys don’t understand basic non sense which backfired on your beloved non Bjp party’s.
they put up shaheenbag,
What’s outcome.
Entire DELHI realised menace and now polarising towards your hated community.
Who won?
GDP isn't decreasing, it isn't increasing at the fast enough rate.But then I saw the mishandling of demonetization and GST and day by day our GDP going down which was his basic promise to us. I also cheered for the ban of the talaq law which in my opinion is unconstitutional. The law should be the same for all citizens of a secular country.
I think Delhi will be won by AAP if not quite by the disproportionate share back in 2015Any internal news if they are going to increase our taxes or otherwise...TBH, I have no hopes but Dil hai ki maanta nahin
On current situation, I think BJP wanted congress and AAP to play they way things are. They knew that shaheen bagh will blow out and hance kept quite and now at peak have capitalised it beautifuly. So while earlier Kejriwal was winning hands down, he is in spot of bother. While, Likes of Congress & BJP should be highlighting mis-mgmt of economy and jobs, all this went into back burner with shaheen bagh.
I do see a remote chance for BJP now , more so, with everybody running after votes of muslims and BJP have always managed to keep their votes intact.
Interesting battles!!!!
GDP isn't decreasing, it isn't increasing at the fast enough rate.
Over a month now. Why couldn't they just do it at jantar mantar ?
Would not inconvenience people and they could sit there as long as they want
Post automatically merged:
GDP isn't decreasing, it isn't increasing at the fast enough rate.
Divide and rule has been landmark of congress.
do show where bjp did it in Center policies ?
Leave it man. With his limited vocabulary he won't be able to comprehend your sarcasm. You might just get a PM with his bank details.Here is the truth. If you really believe this then there is literally nothing I could say to convince you otherwise.
Side note. If you really believe this, then I would also like to tell you I am a Nigerian prince and need your help in getting 500 million dollars out of my country. I will give you a small percentage for your help of course.
LOL dude? Why did you edit your comment in Morse code?............................................ .............................................
How to address those fears ?You have to understand the fear of these people.
There are many documents that can be used for citizenship. Posted a video some pages back.When the prospect of NRC in West Bengal came up before CAA and right after the disaster with incorrect NRC tagging in Assam we looked up the documents to be used as proof for NRC. We have land records dating back to 1937 so that was that.
Like in my mother's ancestral home in Birbhum district in West Bengal their village is mostly made up of Santhali Doms who belong to the tribal class and they were all sharecroppers for my mother's family. They only got their land at the expense of my mother's family (the so-called jotdar/jamindar class in CPM terminology ) after 1978 i.e. after CPM came to power and started the Barga land reforms. None of these people have any documents dating back to 1971 to prove their citizenship.
Until govt clarifies further, we don't know anything about NRCNRC | Understanding NRC: What it is and if it can be implemented across India
In Assam, the Supreme Court mandated and monitored exercise caused widespread disruption. In the state, one first had to produce documentary proof issued before March 24, 1971 – like the 1951 NRC or electoral rolls up to March 24, 1971 – to prove that ones ancestors were residing in India before...economictimes.indiatimes.com
Now remember the cutoff for all these documents is March 24th 1971. Now we won't have any issues as we belong to the educated landed class for better or for worse. But keep in mind the poor who don't even have these documents e.g. mostly in villages.
Heck in 1971 the literacy rate of Indians was 46% among men and 22% among women and this is basic literacy. Doesn't mean that they will have proper documents with every t crossed and i dotted.
So how will NRC work for these people? We know from experience that this government has good ideas but fails at executing large scale ideas which was shown by the demonetization and GST issues.
Funny how that 5% are the ones protesting. The ones who have the least to fear. Riddle me that.We only make up at most 5% of the population in terms of being lucky to be born at our stature but there will be large numbers of people who won't have these kind of documents.
Why is nobody here answering the question ?Divide and rule has been landmark of congress.
do show where bjp did it in Center policies ?
How to address those fears ?
There are many documents that can be used for citizenship. Posted a video some pages back.
Harder still will be for those benefiting from CAA to prove which country they came from. These people had to flee and would not be in a position to bring documents. If they did why would they retain proof they were illegal ? they would destroy those documents isn't it.
Until govt clarifies further, we don't know anything about NRC
Thers no point with arguing with someone who has very little understanding of logical reasoning. I remember a year back I tried to engage him in a logical discussion but got nowhere. Kharche pe khate pe fek diya.Why is nobody here answering the question ?
Is lack of answers proof of no evidence
He's a doctor so knows about logical reasoning.Thers no point with arguing with someone who has very little understanding of logical reasoning. I remember a year back I tried to engage him in a logical discussion but got nowhere. Kharche pe khate pe fek diya.