blr_p said:
Can you clearly, expand on this ?
More governance, less development.
I needn't explain the cons of the political scenario of this nation. Elected billionaires keep working hard during their tenure not to make their beloved country a better place, but for their bank balance and a secured political career.
Democratic visionaries like Benjamin Franklyn warned against career politicians, long ago. My point is that India needs strong leaders and true visionaries and intellectuals more than a low-quality democratic structure and a bunch of inherently corrupt politicians commandeering the ship into oblivion. India needs young minds with critical thinking and the ability to think out of the box, not institutionalized and iPod-happy yuppies hooked to their tellies and relying on media houses for their knowledge and food for thought.
A real secular government, IMO, would be the one that doesn't recognize religions and castes at all. All to be treated fair and equal.
spindoctor said:
you have no idea what you're talking about. i suppose by your logic, hitler wasn't criminal either because how can he make people kill right? how can the holocaust be blamed on him when he didn't personally execute every single jew that was killed?
First things first. Get over my avatar and signature. A couple of months back I was using Heath Ledger's "
The Joker" in place of
Karl Ruprecht Kroenen (Hellboy) now. Guess you lot would have accused me of supporting and sympathizing with a psychopathic mass murderer. All the same.
Comparing Modi with Hitler is like comparing apples and oranges. Hitler signed documents and ordered killing of jews, Modi did not. But it's the same for you.
1992 Bombay riots saw no less inhuman killings on both sides. But the then Congress CM of Maharashtra, also accused of stating "Bombay will burn" was only indicted on count of
ignorance by the Commission. What makes Modi such a monster after all, if not for his allegiance with BJP and Sangh Parivar -- much hated by the pseudo-secularists and delusional mass-media alike?
spindoctor said:
were you in gujarat when it happened? did you lose family during those riots? do you know anyone who was killed or who lost their family members? have you ever spoken to a victim of the riots? do you remember the media blackout which happened while it was going on? do you know that the police was standing guard by order while the mobs were massacring innocent people? do you know that these mobs had accurate lists of the population and their workplaces when they went around (that could only have been sourced from the government)? have you ever seen a row of shops with the muslim ones burned to the ground and the hindu ones still standing?
seriously... what the f*ck do you think know about the gujarat riots? is there any single part of that knowledge not based on what the media told you?
your right wing fundamentalist party just got b**chslapped by the largest democracy on the planet. suck it up.
How many did you lose in that train burned by Islamist fundamentalists? Guess you would have just sucked it up as well if your parents were torched alive in locked coaches? Seriously, secularism kicks in only when it's a moslem suffering in this nation. Congress and their hardliner supporters zip their bickering when Hindus are hacked to bits and torched alive by their precious minority, always trying to play the victim card and seeking appeasement from their overlords.
Gujarat delivered its mandate not once but thrice in favor of Modi. There goes your "WTF do you know" bullshit down the drain. On the contrary, all that you know comes from the same pseudo-secularist bandwagon of media that hails Sonia for saving this country with her
grace.
Just to make things clear: BJP is not
my party. I dislike their religious agendas just as much as I hate the Nehru-Gandhi clan and their pseudo-secularism and other pillars of dirty vote-bank politics like reservation. I'm of the opinion that India needs something better than what we have for options today. Manmohan may well go down the annals of history as one of most appreciated PMs of all time, but this alone does not change the fact that he still is a "Yes, madame!" statesman, not a political leader per se.