Elon takes control of US Govt

roadrash99 said:
Bro I don't care about Project 2025 or heritage foundation.
Click to expand...
There are some extreme recommendations in there. Cherry picked by the opposition to taint the entire report.
roadrash99 said:
I only posted that Guardian article to show you that firing government employees has been their stated objective from day 1.
Click to expand...
This is a vague all encompassing statement. Nothing wrong with firing employees that serve no purpose as determined by the administration of the day.

There are many recommendations in that report. The way you phrase gives the impression ALL recommendations in Project 2025 will be followed. Why? Because the odd few implemented already.
roadrash99 said:
Your response to that is to say that Trump doesn't support it, and even if he supports it's not a bad thing, and even if it's something bad it's not going to happen.
Click to expand...
And I'm referring to the extreme recommendations as that was what the project 2025 opposition hinged upon.
roadrash99 said:
Then why are you debating this, just say you agree with it lol.
Click to expand...
Pointing out saying project 2025 is problematic
 
blr_p said:
Pointing out saying project 2025 is problematic
Click to expand...
What's wrong with following Project 2025? I know very little about it. Just seems like typical US conservative politics erotica from cursory reading, nothing that you don't expect them to do.
blr_p said:
Nothing wrong with firing employees that serve no purpose as determined by the administration of the day.
Click to expand...
But like I said, they aren't firing the ones that don't serve a purpose, that would take effort, it's mass firing without any criteria.
 
roadrash99 said:
Bruh, you can't declare you are going to fire hundreds of thousands of people
Click to expand...
That's a pretty big number. Who fed you that line
roadrash99 said:
indiscriminately without any plan before the election, because it's not good for optics.
Click to expand...
My point is made. Challenging you on 'privatisation' of government
roadrash99 said:
Are you this naive??
Click to expand...
Calling out your numerous attempts at creating narratives (i know the tricks used by the sources you are using) and your making sweeping statements. None of which you are backing up.
 
blr_p said:
That's a pretty big number. Who fed you that line
Click to expand...
No point telling you, as the next immediate thing you will say is that there is nothing wrong with it.
blr_p said:
Challenging you on 'privatisation' of government
Click to expand...
Again it's quite obvious as there is no other motivation to do this. It's not a restructuring, if it was planned firing of specific people you could have argued they are improving "efficiency". It's not the first time in world history this is being done.
 
roadrash99 said:
No point telling you, as the next immediate thing you will say is that there is nothing wrong with it.
Click to expand...
In other words you made it up
roadrash99 said:
Again it's quite obvious as there is no other motivation to do this. It's not a restructuring, if it was planned firing of specific people you could have argued they are improving "efficiency". It's not the first time in world history this is being done.
Click to expand...
Come back after a month or two and then tell me
 
Top Bottom